2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 3.0K–3.0K of 8.9K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
which confirmed that the loan would take over 18 years to repay and result in more than {$98000.00} in interest. 1
which confirmed to me that I had followed the correct instructions. 1
which confirms that I never authorized or participated in any of the activity. 1
which confirms that these accounts 253
which confirms that this tradeline is not reported in their system. The absence of this account in XXXXiswidely used for data validation by creditorsfurther substantiates that it is not legitimately tied to me or my verified identity. 1
which conflicted the information I acted on when moving forward with the loss mitigation package submission. I do not blame the individuals 1
which consequently increased the premium that I now had to pay IMMEDIATELY. ... ... ..... 1
which consist of : Adjustable Rate Rider ARM Disclosure Interest Only Addendum My question here is If the document title truly reflects what is in the contents of the document itself why would the amortization period be referenced at all if the title implies the Interest Only Payment period ''? 1
which consistently displayed a {$0.00} balance dueuntil today 1
which constitute valid legal grounds for rescinding my agreement. 2
which constitutes a clear violation of our arrangement. 2
which constitutes a clear violation of the GLBA ( 15 U.S.C. 6801 ). 1
which constitutes a direct violation of Regulation F 1
which constitutes a direct violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). 2
which constitutes a failure to comply with FACTA. In addition 4
which constitutes a failure to comply with XXXX. In addition 1
which constitutes a gross violation of my rights under the FCRA. 6
which constitutes a material inaccuracy under the FCRA 1
which constitutes a mixed file error. Section 602 ( b ) protects consumers from such reporting abuse. This inaccuracy affects my overall credit profile 1
which constitutes a violation of FCRA 611 and 607 ( b ). 1
which constitutes a violation of Floridas Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices. 1
which constitutes a violation of my rights. The lack of prior warning regarding the reinsertion of this account contravenes both FCRA and FTC regulations. 1
which constitutes a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ). 3
which constitutes a violation of the FCRA. Specifically : 15 U.S. Code 1681i ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) : Failure to conduct a reasonable investigation into the accuracy of the account. 1
which constitutes a violation of the FDCPA ( 15 U.S.C. 1692g ). 2
which constitutes additional violations under IRS reporting obligations. 1
which constitutes continued collection activity without validation. 2
which constitutes deliberate obstruction. 1
which constitutes duplicate reporting Account statuses are inconsistent ( e.g. 2
which constitutes FCRA 's provisions regarding the accuracy 1
which constitutes fraud. 1
which constitutes harassment under 15 U.S.C. 1692d. 1
which constitutes harm. 3
which constitutes illegal reaging Violations Identified : XXXX. Synchrony Bank : o Failed to validate debts prior to reporting or transferring to collectors o Continued updating tradelines monthly after charge-off or sale o Did not mark accounts as sold/transferred in violation of Metro 2 Field 17A 2. Credit Bureaus ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX : XXXX Are publishing inaccurate and misleading tradelines o Have failed to correct or suppress disputed accounts despite multiple disputes o Are enabling reaged accounts to remain on file beyond the XXXX FCRA limit XXXX. Third-Party Collectors ( if applicable ) : Have reported collections without providing full validation Are attempting to collect on debts that were never substantiated,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL,FL,XXXXX,Older American,Consent provided,Web,2025-06-18,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,14153955 1
which constitutes illegal reaging Violations Identified : XXXX. XXXX XXXX : o Failed to validate debts prior to reporting or transferring to collectors o Continued updating tradelines monthly after charge-off or sale o Did not mark accounts as sold/transferred in violation of Metro 2 Field 17A 2. Credit Bureaus ( Equifax 1
which constitutes illegal reaging Violations Identified : XXXX. XXXX XXXX : o Failed to validate debts prior to reporting or transferring to collectors o Continued updating tradelines monthly after charge-off or sale o Did not mark accounts as sold/transferred in violation of Metro 2 Field 17A 2. Credit Bureaus ( XXXX 1
which constitutes inaccurate and unverifiable reporting. 3
which constitutes inaccurate and unverified reporting under FCRA 1
which constitutes income. Under federal law 1
which constitutes non-compliance with both the CFPB dispute process and my rights under FCRA. 1
which constitutes willful noncompliance under 15 U.S.C. 1681n and 1681o. 2
which constitutes willful noncompliance under the FCRA. 1
which contacted me in XX/XX/year>. On XX/XX/year> 1
which contains disclosures about insurance 1
which continued even after I asked them to stop and provide proof of the debt. These calls have been relentless and intimidating 1
which continues to add to my confusion. The notes that I signed ( Attachment 6 ) add up to entirely different figures. Thus 1
which continues to damage my creditworthiness. 3
which continues to decrease with each passing month without a resolution 1
which continues to increase. 1
which contradicted both previous statements. I requested this updated policy in writing. XXXX said XXXX would email us 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →