2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 3.1K–3.1K of 8.9K

Company Complaints
which contradicts Citibank Visa own web page ( as you can verify in the above mentioned PDF ). At the very least this is a software defect 1
which contradicts the evidence and actions taken by other banks and the United States Government Federal and state law enforcement definitions of fraud. A representative of American Express told me they use their own definition of fraud to fit their terms of services. This mishandling of the dispute has left me 1
which contradicts the letter dated XX/XX/2024 1
which contradicts their assertion that a letter was sent immediately after the purchase. 1
which contravene the Federal Credit Reporting Act. For Instance 3
which contributed to a delay in my seeing the full extent of the fraudulent activity. 1
which contributed to the misunderstanding regarding my account status. I request a thorough investigation into these discrepancies by filing XXXX disputes. 1
which contributed to the misuse of my personal information.,,EQUIFAX 1
which conveniently 1
which cost me money. Instead of explanation I was told that I don't read my bank statements. I was forced to closed my credit card.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,BANK OF AMERICA 1
which cost me {$290.00}. 1
which cost over {$1000.00} for a months supply. 1
which cost {$350.00} 1
which could amount to tens of thousands of dollars. 81
which could amount to XXXX of XXXX of XXXX. 1
which could amount to XXXX of XXXX of XXXX. 1
which could amount to XXXX XXXX XXXX of dollars. 1
which could amount to XXXX XXXX XXXX of dollars. 4
which could amount to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 2
which could be a deceptive collection tactic. 1
which could be relevant if inaccurate credit reporting disproportionately affects certain groups. 2
which could be standard business practice but from our perspective could appear to be an action by Ally Home to limit interaction with us as much as possible going forward due to the scenario described within this notice. Put in simple terms a way of making the problem go away.,,ALLY FINANCIAL INC.,PA,189XX,,Consent provided,Web,2021-02-15,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4140654 1
which could cause permanent financial harm. The difficulty of reaching knowledgeable representatives spending XXXX hours on hold 1
which could constitute inaccurate or misleading reporting under the FCRA. 2
which could damage my creditworthiness. Even if no immediate errors are evident 3
which could dictate by law fraud as apart of this lawsuit. These are very real circumstances and I can prove that they are real. 1
which could explain why I was not aware of it. I acquired my first credit card in XXXX which happened to be a secured XXXX XXXX credit card. My information must have been stolen during the several times I lost my wallet throughout the years. Once again 1
which could have been avoided : XXXX : XXXX points XXXX : XXXX points XXXX : XXXX points ( following the attorneys letter on XX/XX/XXXX ) After receiving the attorneys letter 1
which could have serious repercussions on my financial wellbeing. 3
which could have significantly alleviated my financial burden during the critical months of XXXX through XX/XX/2023. 1
which could include ( 1 ) additional time extension on the original Consent Order 1
which could negatively impact my ability to obtain credit 3
which could negatively impact my ability to obtain credit or other financial services. 2
which could negatively impact your credit rating. '' On XX/XX/XXXX 2
which could not be controlled by the customer ( me ). Therefore 1
which could potentially become eligible for PSLF. Learn more about the PSLF program requirements. '' However 1
which could raise red flags for lenders 1
which could resolve my arrears through an interest-free subordinate lien. 1
which could result in statutory and punitive damages.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,FL,32304,,Consent provided,Web,2024-10-24,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,10567645 1
which could serve as an explanation of any information in dispute. The consumer statement can be up to 100 words 1
which could take 3-5 business days. 1
which could take 4-6 weeks. In XX/XX/XXXX 1
which could take 6 - 8 weeks. She could not tell me anything else. In other words 1
which could take a few days. Once the accounts were closed 1
which could take a minimum of 45 days to resolve. This is unacceptable 1
which could take an unspecified amount of time. 1
which could take another week ( XX/XX/2024 ) A process that should've taken XXXX days has taken XXXX weeks now. XXXX weeks 1
which could take several days. 1
which could take up to 15 business days. In the meantime 1
which could take up to 30 to 45 days. This situation has caused me significant stress and chaos as I need access to my funds to pay bills and manage my finances. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related