2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 5.9K–6.0K of 8.9K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
which violates UCC 9-611. 1
which voids or reforms the contract under Louisianas consumer-credit statutes. 1
which was Inquiries are a factual record of file access. If you believe this was unauthorized 1
which was 5 days past my deadline. Because of this 1
which was 5 years ago 1
which was a bait and switch. Most of the people I was talking to struggled to speak XXXX ... I then wanted to pay the bill in full because I felt these people were very dishonest- and they refused to take my payment for the remainder of the balance! The last representative was quite rude 1
which was a balance well below the credit limit. This same amount was paid electronically on XX/XX/2016 1
which was a collection. They advised me to file a dispute 3
which was a Commercial loan with a non-owner occupied. She was under heavy duress and did not read the paperwork since there was a pressured Trustee Sale the very next day from the last lender. The Escrow Officer 1
which was a complete lie because the cushion chosen by XXXX XXXX XXXX was two months escrow payment of {$750.00}. It was the second lie from them because when I looked at my Escrow balance 1
which was a completely separate payment 1
which was a debit/credit audit that states the details of the audit are attached. However 1
which was a flat out lie 1
which was a key point in my dispute. 1
which was a one-time access code ). Maybe I could provide the proper documentation if XXXX would allow me access to my complete account 1
which was a scam because they took all my information to be never heard of. Then I was told to spend more money with another company for credit repair and I refused 1
which was a terrible experience as it usually is ( I was told the first agent 's effort apparently didn't work 1
which was absolutely necessary to manage the financial strain. The financial aid representative at XXXX that I reached out to put me in touch with her associate at Sallie Mae to help me navigate the situation. She thought they would be able to help me. This representative simply suggested that I refinance with XXXX when I could. 1
which was accepted by the Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) and forwarded to XX/XX/XXXX on XX/XX/year>2024. Furthermore 1
which was accepted by the Internal Revenue Service XXXX IRS ) and forwarded to XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/year>. Furthermore 1
which was accepted by the lender however 1
which was activated on XX/XX/XXXX XXXXI don`t even know. and the withdrawal behavior occurs in the bank 1
which was actually a charge for {$530.00}. 1
which was actually still residing at XXXX XXXX Apartments in the same exact room since day one. She was able to give us the names of the students/roommates that rented the adjoining room in that original apartment. When I called and shared that information with Phoenix Recovery Group 1
which was addressed to my old XXXX address 3
which was alarming because I never told her that. Neither XXXX nor the other employees offered an apology. 1
which was also before the due date of XX/XX/XXXX 1
which was also denied. There were other options provided on the XXXX documents in which I was never considered. In fact 1
which was also financed at the contract XXXX. At the time 1
which was also found in the case of Sergio Ramirez v. TransUnion 1
which was an amount I did not authorize and would not have paid to someone who randomly came up to me in a parking lot. I notified Citi that My card was lost or stolen and and the charge from PP * XXXX XXXX XXXX AZ and the charge was unauthorized. Citi cancelled the card and the email said I had {$0.00} liability. Since the scratches were still there 1
which was an error on their part. My escrow account is renewed every year 1
which was and is very frustrating. not just for myself but for anyone else who receives similar offers. I should have received {$100.00} cash back the second time I made the purchase. 1
which was apparently prepared by the Assistant Superintendent 1
which was appropriate. 1
which was Approved By a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
which was approved instantly 1
which was approved. 1
which was around XXXX. 1
which was attached to their response to YOU ) flatly and falsely states ( at page 3 ) : We can confirm your loan is not an MBS loan. As a result 1
which was backdated to cover the disputed period. Despite this approval 3
which was billed as a bank. '' Their rates were quite modest for most deposits 1
which was blatantly false and would not offer an explanation or discussion on the matter. The property was immediately sold at auction. Thankfully we kept a paper trail in anticipation of being defrauded in this process. We hired attorneys to help us navigate through the short sale process on our original primary residence. PNC delayed the short sale process for over XXXX months with a qualified buyer waiting. This home was also foreclosed on 1
which was bought by XXXX 1
which was bought by XXXX and XXXX is now out of business and unable to be contacted and you can no longer access any of their customer accounts 1
which was bought by XXXX and XXXX is now out of business and unable to be contacted and you can no longer access any of their customer accounts 1
which was bought by XXXX. 1
which was cancelled. I complained that I did not want a credit to a non-existent account and that the amount to be refunded was incorrect. I should have been refunded {$1000.00} ( check XXXX and XXXX ) 1
which was caused by this XXXX account caused a utilization spike from 37 percent to over 95 percent ( Exhibit 49 and Exhibit 50 ). This resulted in score drops across all major credit bureaus 1
which was charged on their closing calculation.,,Mr. Cooper Group Inc.,VA,22101,,Consent provided,Web,2024-04-08,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,8718206 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →