2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 5.1K–5.2K of 13.5K

Company Complaints
the price of the software has gone up and as well equipment 1
the Primary Account Holder and they Said Sorry they could not do that. So I had my Son Forward me the Email. There Was Only One that he Found and it was just restating that I had opened the Claim and they were investigating the Claim. 1
the primary cardholder 1
the principal account holder needs to give you access to online account information. We can't let you have online account access without the principal letting you. '' Are you XXXX kidding me? This is contrary to the intent and authority of the POA. 1
the principal amount currently owed still stands at over {$90000.00}. 1
the principal balance 1
the principal has not received the goods as agreed upon. 1
the principle on my loans has only reduced by {$10000.00}. Ridiculous!! 1
The Prinicipal + Interest+ Original Escrow 2
the printouts of our balances and payments ( pulled from their own website ) and asked for help to resolve account. We received NO response to our letter. The XXXX payment never cleared our checking account. 1
the prior 1
the Privacy Act of 1974 4
The Privacy Act of 1974 4
the Privacy Act of 1974 ( 15 USC 1611 ) 3
The Privacy Act of 1974 establishes a code of fair information practices that governs the collection 2
the Privacy Act of 1974 et al. Please see 15 USC 6802 B ) OPT OUT below. A financial institution may not disclose nonpublic personal information to a nonaffiliated third party unless ( A ) such financial institution clearly and conspicuously discloses to the consumer 1
the Privacy act of 1974 EXPLAING CONSUMERS RIGHTS TO PRIVACY 2
The Privacy Act of XXXX establishes a code of fair information practices that governs the collection 1
the privacy of sensitive information 1
the private XXXX XXXX 1
the problem has persisted for more than a year. 1
the problem is that I was informed about the due date until XX/XX/XXXX. 1
the problem persists 3
The problem that we have is that there is over {$1300.00} in this suspense '' account that they are not applying to the past due amount. We were advised by a CSR this past week that we should only have to come up with a down payment of less than our former monthly payment of {$870.00} and that we would not be over extended in the repayment process 1
the problem! Worst Company we have ever dealt with and will NEVER AGAIN!!!,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL,KY,42701,Older American 1
the proceeds 1
the process failed. I reached Coinbase customer service by email on Sunday XX/XX/XXXX and by phone on Monday 1
the process of substantial bookkeeping entries in books of account. '' ) these accounts 3
THE PROCESS ONLINE WAS NOT VERY CLEAR 1
the process server quipped 1
the process with GAP may have been slower than usual due to the pandemic 2
the processing forbearance has just expired 1
the processors 1
the profile and account activity summary corroborate my address. Most importantly 2
the profile is mostly gone and it says that this is 'User not found '. In the end 1
the program ended and I just managed to receive a modification just a week prior to the HAMP program ending. When I contacted another loan servicer and they contacted SLS 1
the program from which I receive funds 1
the prohibition of abusive '' acts or practices is new. While the XXXX itself provides little guidance as to what constitutes an abusive '' act or practice 1
the project was out of town 1
the projected new interest is XXXX 1
the promise of loan was just part of their scheme to commit a fraud crime against USAA... XXXX.and myself...... .at XXXX with them on the phone telling me to just go to XXXX 1
the promised earnings rarely 1
the promissory note permits the alerting of loans past due ONE TIME. This does not authorize your agency to constantly harass borrowers with an identical copy multiple times. A potential restraining order against some agents who do not behave professionally is also a possibility. This is warranted due to a previous complaint where I outlined disturbing details from an Agent and AES/PHEAA claimed they couldn't substantiate '' any of this misbehavior 1
the promo did not necessary apply to me **even though I was approved for the card when I applied for the card under the offer**. 1
the promo plan expiration passed while these issues were still being disputed. As a result 1
the promotion was spend {$750.00} in online purchases and receive 7 1
The PROOF : Filing formal complaints with the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ). 3
the proof of two banks communication 1
the proper amount for the mortgage ( and homeowner 's insurance ) was in their hands by the due date. Their failure to apply it to the mortgage is due to their internal policies. 1
the proper response is to delete the information. See XXXX 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related