2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: L

Companies starting with L that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

2.8K companies starting with "L"

Showing 451–500 of 2.8K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
lead me to believe that this information does not adhere to the required reporting guidelines. These inaccuracies not only negatively impact my credit score but also raise serious concerns about the validity and legality of the reported information. 1
lead to their fraud department 1
LEADER ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 27
Leaders Financial Company 33
Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC 70
Leading Edge Solutions, LLC 4
leading me to believe my information might have been compromised through those transactions. 1
leading me to believe that it was processed 1
leading me to believe that the email I received was concerning the initial ~ {$4100.00} requested balance transfer to XXXX XXXX 1
leading me to believe that they would not resolve the issue in a timely manner. 1
leading me to believe that this lawyer was not appointed by the courts but rather ASF. I did not reach out to him. Another notable piece of paperwork is the Affidavit of Claim which was notarized by the same person who was the Affiant on the other documents 1
leading me to believe they didn't process the payment and are now seeking both the delayed payment and a late fee.,,Navient Solutions 1
leading me to call a wrong number. After several attempts 1
leading me to make decisions that I would not have otherwise considered. 2
leading me to suspect that they might be fraudulent. Upon further investigation 1
leading me to terminate the call. 1
Leading Mortgage Solutions 2
leading to a breach that affected about 1 in every 2 adults in the United States. 1
leading to a seemingly endless repayment period. This has impacted me deeply and has left me in a state of financial strain 2
leading to a severe compromise of my privacy and financial well-being. 1
leading to a severe compromise of my privacy and financial well-being. 2
leading to ambiguities in rights and supporting my bailment intent over debtor-creditor classification. Demand BofA 's response to this point separately. 1
leading to an argument between the judge and XXXX in which he accused the judge of being biased. As a response 1
leading to an extended hold period that effectively spans ten days. 1
leading to an increase in the early payoff amount. Acima stated that they cancelled the lease during the dispute process and would refund what I had already paid and cancel the lease. However 1
leading to another unauthorized charge this month. 1
leading to bank account garnishments and other severe financial consequences for homeowners. 1
leading to confusion and frustration. The promised settlement amount and actual withdrawals do not align 1
leading to confusion and misunderstanding about my obligations. 1
leading to confusion. ( FCRA Section 607 ( a ) ) XXXX XXXXXXXX : Account number : XXXX Violation : Failure to provide clear and accurate information about the account 3
leading to credit denials and financial hardship.,,Kriya Capital 1
leading to damage to my creditworthiness and financial stability. 1
leading to deferred interest charges and late fees. 1
leading to double charges and an incorrect increase in my balance. This resulted in unfair late fees and an account balance that does not reflect my actual payments. 1
leading to extortion 1
leading to false associations and damaging my credibility with lenders. Its presence is misleading and must be removed immediately to prevent further harm to my reputation and financial profile XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
leading to false associations and damaging my credibility with lenders. Its presence is misleading and must be removed immediately to prevent further harm to my reputation and financial profile XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 2
leading to financial damages estimated at {$500.00} in higher interest payments. 1
leading to fines 1
leading to further complications and charges that I attempted to resolve through numerous calls and payments. This resulted in a 30-day late payment being reported on my credit report on XX/XX/XXXX 1
leading to further confusion and incorrect charges. I returned all equipment to an Xfinity store ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
leading to further financial strain. 1
leading to further trauma. 1
leading to harm to reputation and emotional distress. These cases highlight the necessity for credit reporting agencies to adhere strictly to the FCRA 's requirements and to ensure the accuracy of the information they report. 1
leading to identity theft and other financial harms. The following ten case law references support the notion that Equifax is held lliable for their failure of due process when it comes to the failure of keeping all records : 1. In re Equifax Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig. 1
leading to improper collection actions 1
leading to inaccurate adjustments. 1
leading to its deletion. Experians report ( Report XXXX XXXX 2
leading to its initial removal. 2
leading to its repossession by Credit Acceptance. This lack of resolution could also violate the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. ) 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter L that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →