2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 23.6K–23.6K of 25.6K

Company Complaints
is a serious violation of consumer trust and data protection responsibility. The account needs to be deleted from my report reporting XXXX dollars. according to the FCRA 15. U.S.C 1692 ( C ) this account needs to be removed at once. 1
is a serious violation. 7
is a sizeable amount of money. 1
is a tale of betrayal and broken promises. Since XX/XX/XXXX 1
is a testament to my financial stability and trust in your financial instruments and services. My FICO score stands at an excellent XXXX 1
Is a valid question to ask. 1
is a violation of 1692e for false or misleading representations. I have not seen their evidentiary paperwork constituting whatever case they may have tried to make against me but if they were the same documents Capital One has forwarded in the pdf sent with the recent complaint response 1
is a violation of FERPA 1
is a violation of my rights as a consumer. I firmly believe that the absence of this required documentation further invalidates the accuracy and legitimacy of these charge-off accounts on my credit report. 3
is a violation of my rights under the California 's Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.,,TSC Accounts Receivable Solutions,CA,92807,,Consent provided,Web,2016-03-03,Closed with explanation,Yes,Yes,1814642 1
is a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ; therefore if they can not validate the debt 2
is a violation of the Fair debt collection Practices Act FDCPA 807 [ 15 U.S.C. 1962e ] ; therefore 1
is a violation of the FCRA & FDCPA ; therefore 7
is a violation of the FCRA & FDCPA ; therefore if you can not validate the debt 3
is a violation of the FCRA. 6
is a violation of the FCRA. Not only are none of my valid disputes listed as disputed on my credit reports 11
is a violation of XXXX 2
is able to access the new numbers on my debit card even though I activated it by phone and locked it in my safe and never used it at an ATM. This access is something that a bank has access to and not a merchant. Normally if a credit card is cancelled a recurring payment can not be connected to the new card. Cash App was able to connect my new debit card to their system. 1
is about {$17000.00} ( EXHIBIT 2. 2
is absolutely useless. 1
is absurd. Not giving me the proprietary lug nut tool to have it serviced is absurd. If I break down or have a flat tire on the side of the road 1
is ABUSIVE 1
is abusive.,,Levy & Associates 1
is accurate and correctly reflected. 3
is accurate. Reporting the same account with conflicting terms is misleading and not the maximum possible accuracy required by law. 3
is acting id bad faith and being desingenious. Lying is completely against the law and they are trying to get around the system by publishing statements that are not true. 1
is acting wholly in bad faith by failing to communicate with me. My first communication to TrueAccord occurred on XXXX XX/XX/2022. Since XXXX denies responsibility for the loan 1
is acting wholly in bad faith by failing to communicate with me. My first communication to XXXX occurred on XXXX XX/XX/2022. Since Affirm denies responsibility for the loan 1
is actually due since many bank records are no longer available. 1
is actually threatening me in response to a valid customer complaint. I asked her to open the door and proceed with closing my account. She then said that me saying i feel threatened makes HER feel threatened by ME and that i am again the one in the wrong. I disagreed and asked that they process the account closure 1
is actually working for XXXX. 1
is additional interest they are charging me. I requested they hold the payoff amount 1
is affecting us like this. I hold 2 accounts with this company and have always been up on my payments. Regardless of the automatic payment not working out 1
is affecting us like this. I hold XXXX accounts with this company and have always been up on my payments. Regardless of the automatic payment not working out 1
is again a violation of my rights under the FCRA 3
is all attached.,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING 1
Is all fraudlent accts.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,NJ,07111,,Consent provided,Web,2023-04-16,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6843912 1
Is all fraudlent accts.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
is all inaccurate and I also send them a copy of the police report of identity theft and I sent them a copy of the FTC identity The report I was victim of identity 1
is all the account and changes yet there are more and more Fraud accounts. An information includes phishing 1
is all the cards 1
is also being reported as a charge off. I do not recognize this account and never contracted for it. Under FCRA 611 and 623 1
is also included in the load documents including a lean of the bank. I have requested a partial release of XXXX XXXX. I made this request frequently since XXXX of XXXX ( below the start date ). However 1
is also incorrectly reporting late payments. I have consistently maintained my account in good standing 1
is also nearing its full settlement 1
is also not acceptable. He promised that someone would get back with me. But others have promised this before -- that they saw discrepancies 1
is also reported as a charge-off * * 1
is also reported as a charge-off while showing a XXXX balance 1
is also seriously affected by this issue. 1
is also totally unlawful as it not only directly contradicts our rights granted under the XXXX XXXX but also results in discriminatory treatment based on military status ( also a violation of state and federal laws ). 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related