2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 8.6K–8.6K of 25.6K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
I would get them. He told me the investigation would take about a week and they would call me. 1
I would get these excuses : the person to speak to has already left for the day and I will have to wait for them to call me back tomorrow 1
I would greatly appreciate it. No borrower should have to go through this kind of unnecessary hardship.,,MOHELA,IA,52761,,Consent provided,Web,2025-03-25,Closed with explanation,No,N/A,12651136 1
I would greatly appreciate the removal of my profile. 1
I would had been expelled from the school 1
I would have $ XXXX taken out for garnishment. I offered an amount to settle on since they said nothing else could be done. That {$500.00} offered was denied. The woman said the client would not accept such a low amount. She then told me the amount of the alleged debt was {$1500.00} 1
I would have a late fee of 40.00+ and a report on my credit. I would like the same treatment for their mishandling of this issue.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,CA,92555,,Consent provided,Web,2018-03-28,Closed with monetary relief,Yes,N/A,2857903 1
I would have also missed the ability to pay with the discount. This is probably also how I came to have an underpayment in XXXX. On top of this 1
I would have applied the rewards beforehand. I tried to see if maybe they could understand my situation ( that I asked for a limit increase 1
I would have at least chosen to keep the card for the additional year to take advantage of the benefits. I also pointed out to the representative that no where in Citi 's Card Member Agreement do they define a specific timeline for how long a client has to request a refund after an annual fee posts to their account. I also pointed out that I had never received any notification regarding Citi 's refund policy change. Most importantly I felt it was completely unjust that I am expected to pay an annual fee for benefits I will not be able to use 1
I would have at least logged in to my account and not have to have met this fate. She also compared me with her own responsible behavior and how she definitely reads the fine print on all of her own personal credit card offers. If I worked for an untrustworthy bank like Synchrony 1
I would have been able to also make my payment by telephone in a timely manner before XX/XX/XXXX which then made my payment be classified as being late because of your XXXX office being closed which was not fault of my own. Moreover 1
I would have been able to push the payments out until XX/XX/XXXX 1
I would have been advocating about acquiring this program years ago. Since Navient told me about the program in the midst of reapplying 1
I would have been all over it. But 1
I would have been charged yet again. 1
I would have been covered under in-school deferment. 3
I would have been eligible for the bonus. 1
I would have been entitled to XXXX Euros per flight for the original cancellation of my return as well as the cancellation of the rescheduled flight. They would also be liable for lodging 1
I would have been flummoxed by receiving a random check in the mail. 1
I would have been made aware by the collection agency that my account was delinquent and given an opportunity to resolve the matter. This did not happen. 1
I would have been notified sooner and perhaps they could have saved me yet another incidence of my identity being used to fraudulently open accounts/loans. Once I did learn about the loan 1
I would have been only 2 years away. 1
I would have called at XXXX XXXX. Especially considering when the tow truck driver had specifically stated that the police and lender would receive a repossession notification within the hour. 1
I would have called the credit card reconsideration line to speak with someone about getting approved for the Signature '' card.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,BANK OF AMERICA 1
I would have closed the US Bank account. 1
I would have consolidated at that time 1
I would have continued to make my usual payment of {$270.00} throughout XXXX 1
I would have corrected immediately. As a matter of fact 2
I would have corrected it immediately. 1
I would have defaulted on the account for no fault of my own 1
I would have done so immediately. My actions were based entirely on the guidance provided to me at the time. Furthermore 1
I would have every XXXX XXXXdvocacy group and XXXX advocacy working on this. I have seriously considered going to the XXXX XXXX XXXX on your side advocate to help me 1
I would have found the necessary funds to avoid the current situation. It is deeply troubling that I was not offered forbearance or informed of the necessary steps to qualify for it 1
I would have gladly fixed them. I dont feel that this should be on my credit reort due to an error of {$100.00}. This has gotten me very upset 4
I would have gladly paid this collection 2
I would have gone through the site as requested if they had only told me about it two months prior. 1
I would have gone to any of the countless other furniture stores as I was quite sure I would find no problem getting longer finance free promotional periods. For one 1
I would have gone to the bank immediately to : 1 ) protest the excessive monthly charges 1
I would have had a smooth and succinct BPO process 1
I would have had enough to cover all of my transactions and still be in the positive by over {$50.00}. When I checked the dispute online in my account this morning XX/XX/2018 it was showing the {$71.00} dispute closed but the {$100.00} still processing. The first guy I talked to 1
I would have had no problem complying. After putting me on hold for another 30 minutes 1
I would have had no title to the doublewide. There was no reason to deny my streamline mortgage application other than the missing documents they did not have 1
I would have had to mail it from a post offices so that my mailed dispute included tracking/delivery confirmation/return receipt. A trip to the post office to dispute a debt may seem like a rudimentary exercise for someone that is not XXXX 1
I would have had to make ANOTHER {$500.00} payment in XXXX in addition to the {$4000.00} payment I had planned to make to pay off my loan. This is high way robbery of students who are working hard to pay of their loans ON TIME and AHEAD OF SCHEDULE. It is n't enough to not communicate '' these necessary pieces of information. In order to FULLY pay off the loan 1
I would have immediately contested the companys improper conclusion that there was no fraud. However 1
I would have immediately covered the charge. Instead 1
I would have immediately ended the call and not used their service. As you can imagine 1
I would have interest billed that I was not expecting or planning for. 1
I would have just combined them to one purchase. Second 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →