2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: B

Companies starting with B that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

10.7K companies starting with "B"

Showing 10.6K–10.7K of 10.7K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
by myself. 1
by name of the source 1
by name who has top personally sign for them. Not a low-level person or a general inbox 1
by nature 2
by nearly all representatives I have spoke with and promised this would be escalated to upper management with a promised call back within 48 hours '' - THREE times now since this has occurred. 1
by no means accommodating 1
by not acting according to NC Law. 1
by not allowing a user to cancel a transaction within minutes 1
by not correcting the errors that I have documented time and time again. The financial hardship and depression created by the continuous certified mailing to all parties involved. The cost of these mailings has a large financial commitment attached to them. 2
by not correcting the errors that I have documented time and time again. The financial hardship and XXXX created by the continuous certified mailing to all parties involved. The cost of these mailings has a large financial commitment attached to them. 4
By Not Following The Federal Reserve Act of XXXX 1
by not one person 1
by not properly investigating this matter. I have evidence of search via receipts you must not remove the item in any other action 3
by now we had enough of this 1
by other protected class of individuals 1
by Party A. 6
by pathetically resorting to impersonation of a debt collection attorney. 1
by permitting bait-and-switch transactions 1
by phone 2
by phone from my on-record bank at MINUTES after XXXX. 1
by phone or email 1
by phoning and speaking with a Chime agent. Therefore 1
by placing her into A Paper Filter '' which was false and misleading 1
by process of elimination 1
by publishing this inaccurate 9
by pulling my credit report and presumably evaluating my data ) 1
by re-aging the debt after disputes without legitimate cause. 3
by reaching out to us to modify our mortgage policy to an acceptable payment amount that we are able to afford without incurring more debt than we already have from repairs to recover from a disaster and required mitigation 's to protect our property from future damage.,,CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP 1
by refusing to remove the late payments from my credit report despite many requests. 1
by regular mail to Citis XXXX XXXX XXXX South Dakota 1
by renewal 1
by requesting that the very people they compromised give up rights to holding them accountable in one of the only ways that they can. It 's abuse of power they no longer deserve.,,EQUIFAX 1
by requesting the the creditor validate the debt. If they had the required documents and done the validation 1
by requiring disclosures about its terms and cost to standardize the manner in which costs associated with borrowing are calculated and disclosed. I was denied a extension of my own credit without proper disclosure. Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1602 - Definitions and rules of construction ( i ) The adjective consumer 1
by saying this conversation is getting funky. '' I asked him how was the 10 % interest rate determined 1
by saying that I was not charged for their insurance. 1
By SELF FINANCIAL INC. furnishing my data after revocation of consent 1
by selling/purchasing my credit information without my authorization and neither company notified any of the credit bureaus that I was disputing their entry 2
by sending me illegal documents to both me & all ( 3 ) credit bureaus. Be advised : XXXX was sent a cease & desist letter on XX/XX/XXXX and was given ( XXXX ) days to provide federal level legal validation. Your ( XXXX ) days have expired. You are required to send me ( 8 ) things which I clearly posted in the cease & desist letter. This account is formally DISPUTED. Any continued collection activity 1
by sending me in circles and failing to provide clear answers 1
by sending my social security number 1
By signing 1
by someone at XXXX in XXXX XXXX 1
by telephone 2
by texts and email leave messages but no one answered or to call me back? 1
by that time. This unreasonable delay is unacceptable 1
by the blatant attempt by an apparently legitimate company ( Goldman Sachs ) to extract my personal information and that of my deceased father. I can't help but suspect that Goldman Sachs is engaged in data harvesting 1
by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 6
by the Bureau or the applicable State insurance authority ( with respect to any person engaged in providing insurance or annuities ). 27
by the Bureau or the applicable State insurance authority ( with respect to any person engaged in providing insurance or annuities ). [ Note : As amended effective 7/21/11 by 1088 of the Dodd-Frank Act. ] ( 4 ) Limitation on redisclosure of medical information. Any person that receives medical information pursuant to paragraph ( 1 ) or ( 3 ) shall not disclose such information to any other person 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter B that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →