2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 23.0K–23.1K of 29.6K

Company Complaints
and transparency of any transaction that we need to undertake with them. 1
and Transparency of terms and conditions 1
and transparent credit reporting. 2
and transparent disclosures of credit terms at the time of financing. Under 1635 2
and transparent disclosures of credit terms at the time of financing. Under XXXX 1
and transparent investigations. 1
and transparent treatment. Colorado consumer protection statutes also reinforce these rights. Regulation Z ( 12 CFR 1026.2 ( a ) ( 12 ) ) clearly defines consumer credit as being extended for personal 1
and TransUnion 9
and Transunion 1
and Transunion 's actions may also contravene the Consumer Financial Protection Act ( CFPA ) 1
and Transunion 's continuation of reporting inaccurate information on my credit report 1
and TransUnion 's refusal to investigate violates this right.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and TransUnion ( XXXX XXXX. XXXX ( b ) ) Continued reporting of disputed information without proper resolution Improperly shifting the investigative burden onto the consumer after sufficient notice of identity theft I am requesting CFPB assistance XXXX ensure that American Express XXXX XXXX a complete and reasonable fraud investigation Corrects or removes any inaccurate information being furnished to XXXX XXXX 1
and TransUnion ) have received their consent to furnish this information 1
and TransUnion ) verifying information with XXXX the furnisher of information that doesn't exist according to XXXX. Unless each CRA can provide to me a copy of their investigation via XXXX 2
and TransUnion ). 2
and Transunion ). Per 15 USC 1681 et seq. 1
and TransUnion . Despite repeated disputes 3
and TransUnion accountable for willful non-compliance with federal law.,,EQUIFAX 1
and TransUnion accountable for willful non-compliance with federal law.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,NC,27615,,Consent provided,Web,2025-10-02,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,16324039 1
and TransUnion accountable for willful non-compliance with federal law.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and Transunion all are showing my Student loans from XXXX on my credit report which is against the privacy act 1
and Transunion and to date XXXX XXXX has not taken any action with respect to the egregious error they are making.,,EQUIFAX 1
and Transunion are all non-affiliated 3rd parties to XXXX as defined in 16 CFR 313.3 Nonaffiliated third partymeans any person except : ( i ) Youraffiliate ; or ( ii ) A person employed jointly byyouand anycompanythat is not youraffiliate ( butnonaffiliated third partyincludes the othercompanythat jointly employs the person ). 1
and TransUnion are colluding knowingly and willfully to maintain a damaging 3
and Transunion are not maintaining reasonable procedures. Also 12 CFR 1016.7 states that A consumer may exercise the right to opt out at any time. '' I am opting out of your reporting services for the accounts listed. 1
and TransUnion are not maintaining the required reasonable procedures or verifying users and purposes appropriately. Because these failures persist despite disputes 2
and TransUnion are separate entities and are not affiliated with XXXX XXXX. Therefore 1
and TransUnion are separate entities and are not affiliated with XXXX. Therefore 1
AND TRANSUNION are third party companies 1
and TransUnion are willfully allowing damaging 1
and TransUnion at 0 months. 1
and TransUnion concerning 1
and TransUnion continue to report these delinquencies 1
and TransUnion credit reports. 1
and TransUnion credit reports. I am demanding immediate deletion of this account based on multiple violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( XXXX ) and lack of proper verification. 1
and Transunion do not have a phone contact list 1
and Transunion do not have my consent to furnish this information and they surely do not have my written consent. Any and all consent to XXXX 1
AND TRANSUNION do not have my consent to furnish this information and they surely do not have my written consent. Any and all consent to XXXX 1
and TransUnion each report different details 3
and TransUnion each report different details for this account 3
and TransUnion files [ XXXX +2 ] Under FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 5 ) 3
and TransUnion for the reporting of this account. This revocation includes consent in any form 1
and Transunion for their blatant and willful violations of federal law. The following actions must be taken without delay : Immediate deletion of the inaccurate 3
and TransUnion for their continuous disregard of my rights under the FCRA and Texas state law. The blatant noncompliance with FCRA Sections 1681i ( a ) 1
and Transunion for violation of the laws and my rights which I am again exercising my right to privacy and am requesting the items discussed here are removed and deleted not updated with more inaccurate information 1
and TransUnion for willfully and negligently violating multiple provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) in their handling of my dispute regarding an inaccurate and unverifiable tradeline from XXXX XXXX 1
and TransUnion for willfully and negligently violating multiple provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) in their handling of my dispute regarding an inaccurate and unverifiable tradeline from XXXX XXXX. 2
and TransUnion has failed to correct them or provide any actual supporting documentation to justify the continued reporting of negative history. Instead 1
and TransUnion has failed to ensure that these inquiries were legitimate before including them in my report. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related