2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 18.8K–18.8K of 29.6K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
and said I could NEVER open an account with them again. 1
and said I need to withdraw the money and repay him as that's for insurance. I did that. Then 1
and said I should call the number I originally called. So I took the letter on XX/XX/XXXX to the XXXX PNC branch 1
and said I should receive a letter this time. He also recommended I enter a dispute through the credit bureaus on this issue. While it has only been a couple weeks since then 1
and said I was following the dispute process. 1
and said I would have a response within 30 days. Once the 30 days had passed 1
and said I would likely hear back around XX/XX/XXXX. 1
and said it would take too long. I told him I pay my debts if I owe them - I then asked him to read the itemization on this account. He said he would email my file to me if I would read it now. I was at work 2
and said not to worry 1
and said she saw it 1
and said she would have to verify my identity by calling the phone number in my profile. She put me on hold. I put her on hold and answered her call and told her that I was the person she was speaking to. She said that she would return to the previous line. After a few minutes on hold she told me that the system would not let her verify me. 1
and said that XXXX '' would be taking over the call. XXXX then proceeded to try and tell me that a large portion '' of my payment of {$XXXX} would be applied to the Cash Advance balance 1
and said that he was being very aggressive 1
and said that I would need to contact Affirm. 1
and said that since my call was outside 6 months from the transaction date 1
and said that the gift cards would arrive within 35 business days. 1
and said that the modified document was just '' uploaded in XXXX way or another so that XXXX XXXX could approve it '' ( I'm not using the right vernacular here ) 1
and said that they never finished a short sale from beginning to end in the span of 75 days with them. This is not without trying. She explained that the process of getting all documents 1
and said the manager was out to lunch ( XXXX ) and asked us to wait. She came back to us and said the manager would be back in 45 minutes 1
and said these should count as unauthorized payments. Additionally 1
and said they sent an email notifying me. They also stated that my lack of action was taken as confirmation of consent. This is not only false but also a violation of the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ). I never authorized or requested this change. Fortiva has now promised to reverse this and resolve the issue within five days. However 1
and said they were shutting down our request for financing. 1
and said they would place me on administrative forbearance while they worked it out. 1
and said this is definitely a criminal act that they see from contractors all of the time 1
and salary rates. 1
and sale paperwork. I was repeatedly told we sent it to the address we had and never received any documentation. The dealership later told me the vehicle was sold in XX/XX/XXXX 1
and sale-leaseback marketing that flags consumer purpose. TVC is not a good-faith 1
and Sales Manager stated that an illegal and unlawful down payment of {$2800.00} was required to drive off the car lot. However 2
and Sallie Maes XXXX XXXX of autodialer use. This evidence has been professionally organized for federal XXXX and FDCPA litigation and will be presented in full if necessary. 1
and same answer from the CFPB. Not looking into this and Ive sent numerous of filings showing the inaccurate reports. 3
and same documentation that I sent them over two months prior. For me to be sending the same thing twice 1
and same unauthorized activity. This shows inconsistent and unreasonable handling of identical transactions. 1
and Sampson to notify the CFPB at the very first sign of potential fraudulent practices ( as opposed to making the same mistake that I did by delaying my opportunity to file a complaint ). I also advise individuals NOT to assume that any mistake regarding outstanding debt amounts on behalf of Linebarger 1
and satisfying Chase Banks demands for in-branch verification. I also updated ( added ) a cellular phone number on the account ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 1
and Saturday 1
and save ( which I could do either ). My heart fell because I was so excited about this repayment program. After so many years 1
and saved cards like that of an online wallet 1
and savings! 1
and saw a picture of myself and my children printed off in their file of my case. The picture looked as if it was from a XXXX picture. 1
and saw no points 1
and saw nothing finalized. 1
and saw that I would be not be charged a maintenance fee on my checking account as long as I maintained at least {$5000.00} in my savings account. 1
and saw that my mortgage seems to be current 1
and say someone will call me WITHOUT EVER GIVING A SPECIFIC DATE OR TIME WHEN. And each time USAA does decided to call me 1
and saying : ... if we don't hear from you by XX/XX/XXXX ( 2 days upon receiving this letter ) 1
and says the account is paid through XX/XX/XXXX. I do not understand why my XX/XX/XXXX amount is not applied-but it says my account is paid to XX/XX/XXXX 1
and scare tactics ; then tow our only vehicle only two days past our first payment due date; wrote off the debt; placed a lien on my vehicle and reported a significant negative credit report. I am not well 1
and scared by how they treated me. I had a XXXX XXXX. 1
and Scheduled Payment. On Transunion 's end there were multiple errors as well I pointed out from Inaccurate phone number 1
and school services to young women in crisis. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →