2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 8.9K–8.9K of 29.6K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
and failed to maintain reasonable procedures to ensure maximum accuracy under FCRA 607 ( b ).,,EQUIFAX 1
and failed to maintain reasonable procedures to ensure maximum accuracy under FCRA 607 ( b ).,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,NV,89031,,Consent provided,Web,2025-11-25,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,17466764 1
and failed to maintain reasonable procedures to ensure maximum accuracy under FCRA 607 ( b ).,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and failed to mention not only the insurmountable amount of interest that would accrue 1
and failed to provide accurate information. They initially claimed the appeal was closed 1
and failed to provide timely 1
and failed to realize it until only a couple of days before our closing dates. This speaks massively to Cardinal Financials ' negligence and incompetence when it comes to managing VA home loans. As a veteran 1
and failed to report that to the credit bureaus the final balance I would in fact owe if '' any. 2
and failed to send clear written transfer notices.,,PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES 1
and failed to validate this request 2
and failing to act when borrowers complained. Through shortcuts and deception 1
and failing to adequately notify consumers of dispute outcomes. These failures align with my experience 2
and failing to communicate that the debt is disputed. 1
and failing to conduct a lawful investigation after notice of dispute. 1
and failing to mark the account as in dispute after receiving my dispute. 3
and failing to protect consumers with basic security measures 1
and failing to provide clear and accurate disclosures. Additionally 1
and failing to provide it is a direct violation of the law. 4
and failing to remove an unverified charge-off after a dispute demonstrates a negligent and non-compliant reinvestigation process. 1
and failing to respond to all key elements of that complaint. They actually falsely lead me to believe that they were evaluating my complaint all along that time 1
and failing to utilize reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy and completeness of information in consumers files. 1
and fails to disclose that it is no longer the creditor or servicer with authority 2
and failure protect confidential information confidentiality is important caused by another person can sue for emotional distress ... fault amounting to at least negligence ; and 4 ) damages 1
and failure to cease collection after receipt of identity theft documentation constitute unlawful 3
and failure to complete reinvestigation. The presence of future-dated entries further demonstrates systemic noncompliance. 3
and failure to conduct a reasonable investigation. 2
and failure to correct errors after notice. 1
and failure to correct inaccurate informationare present in my tradeline. 1
and failure to correct or delete these items violates federal law and exposes the reporting agencies to potential legal action and liability. 1
and failure to effectively manage my Federally-backed XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX . 1
and failure to issue a required Form XXXX after a claim was filed with the IRS These furnishers have failed to comply with FCRA 602 ( A ) accuracy standards and must delete these accounts immediately. 2
and failure to mark accounts as disputed. 1
and failure to mark the accounts as disputed. 3
and failure to notify affected consumers of material changes in asset ownership and servicingparticularly under SEC Rule XXXX. 1
and failure to notify the consumer. 1
and failure to pay could result in cancellation of my coverage. 1
and failure to pay could result in wage garnishment or I can file more forborances which after those are exhausted I would begin my XXXX repayment over the next 10 years. How many people will become homeless or go hungry? Before XXXX I was enrolled in a program 1
and failure to provide an accounting of loan balances 1
and failure to provide MOV constitutes a serious breach of federal law.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,FL,33511,,Consent provided,Web,2025-05-29,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,13783621 1
and failure to refund money that was wrongfully deducted from my bank account. 1
and failure to remove unverifiable or fraudulent information violates the FCRA. 1
and failure to respond to valid disputes. 3
and failure to supervise. 1
and failure to validate debts. This is the exact same behavior : ignoring validation requests and continuing to report derogatory information that they can not legally substantiate. 1
and FAIR and ACCURATE CREDIT TRANSACTION ACT of 2003 ( FACTA ) SEC.312. Procedures to enhance the accuracy and integrity of information furnished to consumer reporting agencies. ( b ) duty of furnishers to provide accurate information. Section 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) of THE FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT ( 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) is amended ( 1 ) in subparagraph ( A ) 2
and fair compensation for this quality leadership. 1
and fair credit access. 1
and fair credit opportunities. 2
and fair credit terms. I have disputed this multiple times and you have not provided the method of verification as required under FCRA 609 ( a ). This continued reporting after dispute constitutes willful noncompliance and negligent harm under 616 and 617 of the FCRA. If you do not remove this collection 2
and fair credit. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →