2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 8.9K–8.9K of 29.6K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
and explained there was a system error when ordering a new card 1
and explained why I was reaching out again. 1
and explaining all of this 1
and explaining my urgent situation 1
and explaining that assure ' means 'to make sure or certain : put beyond all doubt 45
and explaining that assure ' means XXXX make sure or certain : put beyond all doubt 14
and explains how to do this. 1
and explanation of charges. I have been repeatedly denied. The following month 1
and explicit threats 2
and explicitly stated that the store must honor the correction. I can provide this recording if requested. 1
and exposed counterparties to material uncertainty and risk. 1
and exposed me to aggressive debt collection activity for debts I do not owe and never incurred. 1
and exposed me to potential identity theft. Despite notifying the bureaus previously 1
and exposed me to reputational harm. 1
and exposed the company to liability for defamation and financial injury. 3
and exposes me to unnecessary economic risk. The Bureau has made clear that creditors can not create barriers to repayment that are designed to profit off penalties and third-party collection mechanisms. Yet Affirm is doing exactly that. 1
and exposes my personal information to inaccuracy. Under 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) 1
and exposing me to financial loss.,,EQUIFAX 1
and exposing me to financial loss.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and exposing me to ongoing reputational and financial harm. 3
and exposing yet possibly more corrupt 1
and express great safety concern for me about driving it. They did know that I have a warranty through AUL for powertrain that I was FORCED to purchase when I bought the car in XXXX 1
and express UPS mail. They have NOT acknowledged receiving it. In fact 1
and expressed my concern and worry that my credit would be impacted 1
and expressing concerns about the wording of their Account Agreement. 1
and extension of credit specifically because of these three accounts on my report that only appear in my TRANSUNION report. This has affected me emotionally 1
and extinguished nunc pro tunc.Failure to provide the above remedy within 10 business days of receipt will result in : Filing of formal complaint with the Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) regarding improper use 1
and extort monies from them and if they do n't pay you sick the hounds on them. Perhaps a thorough investigation is needed as to XXXX fraudulent and deceptive practice to unsuspecting consumers.,,Exeter Finance 1
and extorting people out of their hard earned money by letting interest accrued for 4 years before reaching out to let us know the payment did not process on their end. 1
and extortion by continuing to damage my credit reputation and pressuring me to resolve a debt that I do not owe. This has caused me significant emotional distress 3
AND EXTORTION I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS. 1
and extortion. Transaction 1. Any event that causes a change in an organizations financial position or net worth 1
and extremely misleading. 2
and face {$900.00} more in pending repairsover {$6700.00} in totalon a car that already carries an inflated loan balance. 1
and facing multiple federal lawsuits for systematic fraud 2
and FACTA Identity Theft Red Flags Rule 1
and FACTA Production of actual source documents Enforcement actions if bureaus fail to comply 7. Desired Resolution I request : Permanent deletion of all the disputed accounts Deletion of the inaccurately reported bankruptcy A corrected consumer report from each bureau Compliance with federal law immediately,,EQUIFAX 1
and FACTA Production of actual source documents Enforcement actions if bureaus fail to comply 7. Desired Resolution I request : Permanent deletion of all the disputed accounts Deletion of the inaccurately reported bankruptcy A corrected consumer report from each bureau Compliance with federal law immediately,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,GA,30039,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2025-12-21,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,18205751 1
and FACTA Production of actual source documents Enforcement actions if bureaus fail to comply 7. Desired Resolution I request : Permanent deletion of all the disputed accounts Deletion of the inaccurately reported bankruptcy A corrected consumer report from each bureau Compliance with federal law immediately,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and factually impossible. 2
and factually inaccurate 1
and fail to accurately reflect the true date of first delinquency or lawful account origination. 2
and fail to inform consumers of actual dispute outcomes ( XXXX XXXX ). 1
and failed to comply with any obligations they have under FDCPA 1
and failed to comply with collection law as per MN law. 1
and failed to conduct proper investigations into my disputes. These actions have significantly impacted my ability to secure loans and manage my financial life. 3
and failed to correct obvious inaccuracies within the statutory timeframe. 3
and failed to do so for 7 years 1
and failed to inform me of the potentially negative financial implication of moving forward with the credit card application. This outcome is patently unfair. Despite multiple time consuming attempts to identify a resolution that did not involve a second hard pull on my credit ( e.g. a soft pull or an exception to their policy to use the initial credit pull ) 1
and failed to inform me that I would be required to pay for such rectification. In fact 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →