and fair credit terms. I have disputed this multiple times and you have not provided the method of verification as required under FCRA 609 ( a ). This continued reporting after dispute constitutes willful noncompliance and negligent harm under 616 and 617 of the FCRA. If you do not remove this collection

What the CFPB Record Shows About and fair credit terms. I have disputed this multiple times and you have not provided the method of verification as required under FCRA 609 ( a ). This continued reporting after dispute constitutes willful noncompliance and negligent harm under 616 and 617 of the FCRA. If you do not remove this collection

and fair credit terms. I have disputed this multiple times and you have not provided the method of verification as required under FCRA 609 ( a ). This continued reporting after dispute constitutes willful noncompliance and negligent harm under 616 and 617 of the FCRA. If you do not remove this collection has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XXXX, and the most recent logged activity is XXXX XXXX , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, and fair credit terms. I have disputed this multiple times and you have not provided the method of verification as required under FCRA 609 ( a ). This continued reporting after dispute constitutes willful noncompliance and negligent harm under 616 and 617 of the FCRA. If you do not remove this collection reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "and therefore this account can not be legally collected or reported. FCRA 611 requires a reasonable reinvestigation and proper verification from the furnisher", and the single most common underlying issue is "full account history".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating and fair credit terms. I have disputed this multiple times and you have not provided the method of verification as required under FCRA 609 ( a ). This continued reporting after dispute constitutes willful noncompliance and negligent harm under 616 and 617 of the FCRA. If you do not remove this collection: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.