2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 6.4K–6.5K of 29.6K

Company Complaints
and assist with ensuring that my consumer rights under the FCRA are upheld. 1
and assistance with becoming an accredited investor. The goal of the program was to help get houses fixed and sold 1
and assistance with resolving this matter.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,GA,300XX,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2022-10-17,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6095110 1
and assistance with resolving this matter.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and associate IDs to him and other supervisors. I was told that this still was not enough to track down the Equifax rep. Or 1
and associated costs. I would not have incurred these expenses had I been informed at the outset that the disputed accounts would prevent approval. 1
and associated earnings on the fund performance since XX/XX/XXXX 1
and associated factors. 1
and ASSUMED I asked for hard pulled. 1
and assumed I would be able to meet the required spending. 1
and assumed these messages were promotional in nature. As a result 1
and assurance that consumers are not harmed when a merchant fails. 1
and assurance that customers will not be subjected to undocumented or selectively enforced standards 1
and assurance that my credit and personal safety will not continue to be compromised. 1
and assurance that this is fixed for good. 1
and assurances that this would be corrected soon 1
and assure any inadequacies identified have been address accordingly. '' But instead they tag me of doing fraudulent activities and me out to be the bad person. My business is going down hill while PayPal have my money XXXX. I apply for the loan 1
and assured me that I was protected against fraud. The charge was removed but later reapplied. 1
and assured me that she would be calling me back shortly. I never heard from her again. 1
and assured me that the two hard inquiries would be removed. 1
and assured me that with the issue now resolved 1
and assured me the account wouldnt be frozen. On XX/XX/XXXX funds were frozen .. again. Ive now called multiple times ( at least once every day ) 1
and at a balance of around $ XXXX than double my original mortgage. 1
and at best it was a very deceptive act. I'm concerned about those who have actually fallen for this illegal tactic.,,Bread Financial Holdings 1
and at Chase Bank. At no point was she warned that repeated attempts could close the account. 1
and at closing they wanted to recoup the premiums they paid but that were not necessary. We also found out during these closings that a broker fraudulently obtained a loan modification in XXXX XXXX that we did not authorize using loan documents with our forged signatures. 1
and at every step 1
and at first 1
and at intervals as outlined in 12 CFR 1026.2. 2
and at least 1
and at least one neighbor 1
and at least two other customers. Everything started when the teller told my spouse 1
and at no point did a Customer Service rep ever called me 1
and at no point did the bank inform me of their decision let alone notify me of any status. It was n't until my account was in the negative that I had to call and find out what happened. I asked about this paperwork that I never received and inquired as to when it was mailed out. The rep stated she did n't have a way to pull up that info. I asked what my next options were 1
and at no point did The XXXX Bank ever notify of this issue or returned the transfer funds 1
and at no point was I notified of a problem. 4
and at no time did anyone come onto my property to do any work to preserve it. Please keep in mind US Bank charged my account {$15.00} each time. Which begs to ask 1
and at one point said he refused to identify me because WE reported that our account was compromised. I told him that I never reported that our account was compromised 1
and at second chance at being a homeowner once more - I am just trying to move on with my life.,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,Ditech Financial LLC,AZ,85029,,Consent provided,Web,2015-09-10,Closed with explanation,Yes,Yes,1548198 1
and at that point any foreclosure process would cease until a determination had been made. 1
and at that point in time they should have corrected the address but failed to do so. Never even called me to confirm my address or to ask about settling the balance. 1
and at that point were told that it was our responsibility to pay this tax bill. At this point 1
and at that time was only a contract consultant. She could not have served as a legitimate verification source for a tradeline that originated well after her departure. 1
and at that time was told that since this was between 4-5 years ago 4
and at the cashier 's desk they told me that it was no longer possible because the bank had pending charges 1
and at the end 1
and at the end could not help at all. 1
and at the end said it was declined due to safety reasons. He said I can try to use somewhere else online. 1
and at the same location. 1
and at the same time 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related