Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX XXXX LL All on XX/XX/XXXX or XX/XX/XXXX Story : None of these inquiries were approved by me. I have not shopped for auto loans or services on these dates. The sheer volume of inquiries suggests either unauthorized access or synthetic fraud. 1
XXXX XXXX MA XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX MA XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX MADE AN UNLAWFUL CHOICE IN CONTACTING MY PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANY TO PAY A REMAINING BALANCE IN XX/XX/XXXX THAT WAS NOT EVEN DUE AT THE TIME on my behalf HOWEVER DISBURSED A PAYMENT OF ( {$450.00}. ) THEN DEDUCTED THAT PAYMENT FROM ESCROW TO A NEGATIVE BALANCE 1
XXXX XXXX made this flimsy decision. XXXXXXXX XXXX chose to use improper 1
XXXX XXXX Magistrate Court 1
XXXX XXXX mailed verified letter was sent to XXXX XXXX XXXX and received by them on XX/XX/21 asking them to verify the supposed debts ( accounts XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX mails a second check to Upgrade WITH a current statement from the account and the information that Upgrade wants with the check AGAIN. This was XX/XX/XXXX. It has been almost another month and Upgrade is still not crediting my account as paid. I will be speaking with someone tomorrow 1
XXXX XXXX marked this as fraud in XXXX of XXXX and issued a ID Fraud application ref # they had 90 days to send a deletion letter to Equifax and never did resolve this issue and failed to follow protocol and violated policy. The XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX hard inquiry and the above mentioned fraudulent collections appearing on my consumer FICO credit report 1
XXXX XXXX MD Phone : XXXX Email : XXXX XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Windham Professionals 1
XXXX XXXX me 1
XXXX XXXX MI XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX 1
XXXX XXXX mislabeled the Roth IRA as a traditional IRA. 1
XXXX XXXX misrepresented the interest rate and monthly payments for the modification option. These are important parameters for reaching a decision. 4
XXXX XXXX Mobile : XXXX XXXX XXXX address XXXX XXXX XXXX,,BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION 1
XXXX XXXX mother being informed about the use of an arbitrator or mediator to resolve the dispute. 1
XXXX XXXX MS 1
XXXX XXXX my name is spelled XXXX XXXX XXXX Addresses that do not belong to me : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX my service representative 1
XXXX XXXX NA XX/XX/XXXX 3
XXXX XXXX Name : XXXX 3
XXXX XXXX NC XXXX XXXX Date : XX/XX/XXXX XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX NC XXXX XXXX Date ; XX/XX/XXXX XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX OH XXXX XXXX Date ; XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX NC XXXX XXXX Date : XX/XX/XXXX XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX NC XXXX XXXX Date ; XX/XX/XXXX XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX OH XXXX XXXX Date ; XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX NC XXXX XXXX Date : XX/XX/XXXX XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX NC XXXX XXXX Date ; XX/XX/XXXX XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX OH XXXX XXXX Date ; XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ; XXXX BANK ; XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX needed a fee breakdown from its own lawyers ( see attached chat transcript of XX/XX/18 ). XXXX XXXX would escalate the request 1
XXXX XXXX needs to address each and every point in detail as would be expected in a XXXX Supreme Court decision unless it prudently instructs every XXXX to delete the file permanently. Hopefully 1
XXXX XXXX never called us to design a personalize treatment plan as offered in the XXXX web site page ( See Section K ). 1
XXXX XXXX New Jersey 4
XXXX XXXX NMLS XXXX '' <XXXX> 3
XXXX XXXX NMLS XXXX '' <XXXX> date : XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX No Data Available 1
XXXX XXXX NO VOICEMAIL AGAIN ON XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX nor BMO ( if he did indeed inform his higher ups ) -- has never reached out to me with any kind of explanation 1
XXXX XXXX O Date XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX of California 1
XXXX XXXX of California does not report any bankruptcy filings to any credit reporting agencies. '' TransUnion is providing inaccurate and incomplete provider information in response to my request under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. I requested verification information pursuant to Section 611 1
XXXX XXXX of my payments have been timely 3
XXXX XXXX OF RI XXXX. XXXX 3
XXXX XXXX of their original terms clearly outlines the process for redeeming prizes 1
XXXX XXXX of Washington. 3 fraudulent assignments of mortgage within 10 years 1
XXXX XXXX OF XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX of XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX of XXXX XXXX advised that under Ohio law 1
XXXX XXXX of XXXX XXXX was proclaimed to be the Trustee. Since he ceased to be the Trustee per notice dated XX/XX/2024 1
XXXX XXXX of XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX OF XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX OH XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX OHIO XXXX XXXX OH 1
XXXX XXXX on my Acct # XXXX is fraud. XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX on the letter ) is disconnected. 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.