Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX XXXX on Tuesday 1
XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX 4
XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX Those accounts are results in several fraudulent hard inquiries and fraudulent collections appearing on my consumer FICO credit reports. I attach a list of the hard inquiries in question 1
XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX the landlord XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) provided an itemized list of the deductions of my XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX on XXXX 3
XXXX XXXX on XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX SXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,PA,185XX,,Consent provided,Web,2022-04-05,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5408632 1
XXXX XXXX OneMain Financial with the adverse action taken against me denying me my rights of which civil damages pursuit to 15 U.S.C. 1640 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( iii ) are up to { {$5000.00} }. 1
XXXX XXXX only offered us the option to continue repairs or return the vehicle 1
XXXX XXXX only sent emails filled with empty assurances and unfulfilled promises. I received no assistancelet alone resolutionfrom XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX opened XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX opened XX/XX/XXXX Amount XXXX {$14000.00} 3
XXXX XXXX openly admitted to FRAUD and agreed to assume the business and ALL of its debts. There are multiple witnesses including attorneys and former employees of XXXX XXXX SBA department who were present when XXXX admitted to fraud and agreed to assume the business and its debts. There are also documents prepared by a forensic CPA that show how XXXX double counted his earnings 1
XXXX XXXX operates from XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX operator ID # XXXX XXXX reached out from PLS and informed me that PLS would NOT refund the money 1
XXXX XXXX opted to charge off the account without resolution or proper notification XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date Opened : XX/XX/XXXX Balance : {$14000.00} Issue : Charge-off and duplicate reporting Law : FCRA 1681e ( b ) Story : This account appears more than once with conflicting details 1
XXXX XXXX or the SoFi Member Advocacy Team. 1
XXXX XXXX Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$1800.00} 1
XXXX XXXX origination fees. Demand that the borrower 1
XXXX XXXX our account IS being charged ANY and ALL extra fees as well as 29 % interest on the balance. Brings us to writing to you for help. 1
XXXX XXXX outlined that there would be approx. {$2000.00} in closing costs and that the roof would probably have to be replaced BEFORE they could approve the loan. I immediately responded by instructing her to withdraw my application. She replied okay ''. She agreed to withdraw my application. She then called me back a few minutes later and stated that by law 1
XXXX XXXX P.S. I bet you get XXXX when someone constantly gives you the runaround too. 1
XXXX XXXX PA XXXX These addresses are not mine and are directly tied to the fraudulent activity. I have provided Experian with updated government-issued identification and documentation proving my claims 1
XXXX XXXX PA XXXX,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,Funding Metrics LLC,HI,96813,,Consent provided,Web,2025-10-30,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,15992488 1
XXXX XXXX past due reported on a collection its a violation 1
XXXX XXXX payments. To our amazement we were informed that we could not get the refinance loan because we were late on our primary mortgage payment. When we went back to Countrywide to talk to them 1
XXXX XXXX PDT Subject : XXXX XXXX Fw : Important ACH Notice Good evening 1
XXXX XXXX persistent on statements 1
XXXX XXXX Phone : ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX Please find additional evidence ). And therefore 1
XXXX XXXX Please investigate if every piece of information is correct. If not 1
XXXX XXXX pm On XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX Police Department 1
XXXX XXXX Policy ). There are transactions listed on your History Report were payments were credited to Insurance. 1
XXXX XXXX potentially negative icon Potentially Negative StatusPaid 1
XXXX XXXX POX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification 1
XXXX XXXX purposely excluded any signed contract agreement between XXXX XXXX XXXX Credit card company and card holder. 1
XXXX XXXX received documents and instructions from named XXXX XXXX Bank XXXX If they did not received it from XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX received from XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX received XXXX XXXX request for validation of debt. Statements were sent to XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/year>. Per XXXX XXXX 's request 1
XXXX XXXX refused to refund me because of my legitimate concern under duress 1
XXXX XXXX refuses to complete its fraud investigation 2
XXXX XXXX refuses to recognize that payment and forced us to make that payment again to them. Then XXXX XXXX insisted we had to pay the 2nd payment to them which we did. They continue to demand we make monthly payments 1
XXXX XXXX reported a credit inquiry by a home mortgage company 1
XXXX XXXX reported a {$0.00} balance owed until XX/XX/2021. 1
XXXX XXXX reported OK ( paid ) XXXX. On XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX reported the account as a collection account on XX/XX/year> this reporting is innaccurate and misleading for the following reasons :. the account is a business account not a personal account. the payment was made as instructed automatically and on time. 2
XXXX XXXX reported to the Transunion that I applied for credit I never applied for. They have violated my rights to have fair and accurate information on my credit report. 1
XXXX XXXX reported XXXX ( paid ) 3. On XXXX 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.