Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX Date XXXX Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 2
XXXX days after the due date 1
XXXX days late ( XXXX ) 1
XXXX days late in XXXX XXXX 3
XXXX days late XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$3900.00} Date Opened : XX/XX/XXXX Last XXXX Date Last XXXX late XXXX days XXXX XXXXXXXX 1
XXXX did not disclose or mention that the account had been acquired by a collections agency. Additionally 1
XXXX did not protect me and refused to take this fraud seriously Plese help! 1
XXXX discovered anomalies in the account(s) 1
XXXX does not allow this practice and has corrected the account based on my previously filed grievances.,,General Motors Financial Company 1
XXXX does not allow this practice and has corrected the account based on my previously filed grievances.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,GA,XXXXX,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2018-05-04,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,2896694 1
XXXX f/k/a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( C.D. Cal. ). Shortly after closing XXXX services mortgage loans became a wholly owned subsidiary of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. 1
XXXX FCEUA 73 P.S. 2270.4 ( b ) ) : The account shows a balance of {$430.00} on a {$200.00} credit limit 1
XXXX fee 1
XXXX Finance/Personal ( XXXX ) XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION,NJ,07202,,Consent provided,Web,2022-01-25,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5146823 1
XXXX Florida XXXX ). 1
XXXX from XXXX last year with my XXXX XXXX Yet 1
XXXX had not followed through on their end ( no surprise considering that the fraudulent charges had to have been made by one of their employees. ) Golden 1 was of no further help and the XXXX Fraud unit had disregarded my signed affidavit and essentially then called me a liar. I find it incredible that the XXXX Fraud unit could ignore and disregard my signed affidavit. That affidavit is a legal document yet it is perfectly fine for them to totally reject a legal document. Why was I instructed to file the affidavit in the first place if anybody could nullify it on a whim and speculation? I find that very disconcerting and it speaks volumes about the apparent worthlessness of legal documents! 1
XXXX has an alternate name of XXXX XXXX listed RIGHT NOW. Several inquiries that are not mine 2
XXXX has continued to verify and retain false late payment notations 1
XXXX has incorrectly charged me two times of {$1000.00} 1
XXXX has not held its duties as data furnishers and the consent order by regulatory authorities.,,SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA 1
XXXX has refused to complete the treatment as specified in the signed agreement despite receiving payment. XXXX has also been unresponsive to my calls 1
XXXX I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence 3
XXXX ignored this information and refused to credit the difference. Additionally 1
XXXX In XXXX 1
XXXX information divulged to the court appears to have been simply accepted in good faith. So the final conclusion was that XXXX of millions of dollars are missing 1
XXXX insurance through escrow. 1
XXXX internal record showing post-rental vehicle swap 1
XXXX is reporting last payment as XX/XX/XXXX 2
XXXX is required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information within XXXX days 1
XXXX is specifically required to conduct comprehensive reinvestigations of disputed items 2
XXXX is XXXX to civil penalties under XXXX law XXXX at least {$100000.00} for multiple violations of A.R.S. XXXX. 2
XXXX law governs this transaction. 1
XXXX listed the last reported date as XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX made their first request for all forms 1
XXXX maintained the 30 day late and again reported the 30 day late to the two remaining major credit reporting agencies. So I am back to square one on this issue!!!!! 1
XXXX My perspective is that Navy Federal has not had my best interest in mind and is not working on my behalf to recover these funds. The supervisor today shared with me that I will receive a response to my appeal in the next 15 days 1
XXXX names itself as the lender in the loan contracts 1
XXXX Notice for validation of debts 1
XXXX of inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX on the same day to see 1
XXXX Once on the site 1
XXXX opened 1
XXXX or otherwise ) to authenticate. I do not use or have other XXXX apps. 1
XXXX or XXXX } this action might constitute fraud under both Federal and State Laws. Due to this fact 1
XXXX or XXXX XXXX XXXX - that you did not order 1
XXXX Police report number # XXXX 1
XXXX Product Catalogue 1
XXXX quickly reported that late payment to the bureau. 1
XXXX Recipient Bank Address XXXX Recipient Bank Address ( continued ) : Recipient Bank Suite/Mail Stop : Recipient Bank City : Recipient Bank Country : [ None ] Recipient Bank State [ None ] Recipient Bank Zip Code/Route : Recipient Name on Account : XXXX Transfer Conf # XXXX ; XXXX 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.