Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
and disclosed that on XX/XX/XXXX the appraiser had requested more time '' a completely different explanation than what I was previously given by other individuals involved. 1
and disclosure of securities and financial instruments. 1
and disclosure of their personal information. 3
and disclosure of their personal information.,,EQUIFAX 2
and disclosure of their personal information.,,HW Holding 1
and disclosure of their personal information.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,TX,77042,,Consent provided,Web,2024-11-19,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,10854730 1
and disclosure of their personal information.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,WI,53217,,Consent provided,Web,2023-12-24,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,8053659 1
and disclosure of their personal information.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and discounts in selling the alleged debt. 5
AND DISCOVER CHANGED THE DATE FROM XX/XX/XXXX TO XX/XX/XXXX! THAT IS ILLEGALL! I WROTE THEM A DEMAND LETTER 1
and DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES has not given me a reasonable opportunity to opt out of the disclosure before the information was disclosed to multiple nonaffiliated third parties without my consent. 1
and Discover has failed to return them within a reasonable timeframe or through accessible means. This has prevented me from accessing or using my own money 1
and Discover has never addressed or acknowledged the procedural failures described above. 1
and Discover possesses lawful standing to claim or enforce this alleged obligation. 1
and Discover would close it without asking after they did not do their fair share of job to verify our Notaries. 1
and Discover {$9900.00} 1
and discovered that I had completed too many credits than what the licensure program entailed. This is when I discovered that the school had made a mistake 1
and discriminated against me. Additionally 1
and discriminated against. I was made to feel as though I had done something wrong when in fact Santander Bank was in the wrong for denying me my funds. 1
and discriminates against consumers like myself. I spoke at length with several Quicken representatives and ended up speaking to XXXX XXXX 1
and discrimination in commerce. This is a direct violation of the equal access principle that this nation is built upon. 4
and discriminatorily. 1
and discriminatory experience 1
and Discriminatory Treatment Representatives have : - Called me white trash '' - Repeatedly called me a liar - Made derogatory comments about my intelligence - Accused me of fraud and fabricating evidence - Shown no empathy for documented emergencies ( loss of service dog ) - Treated me with contempt and condescension at all levels 1
and discussing the suboptimal state of our room with the front desk agent 1
and disinterested behavior for hours! 1
and dismissed my concerns 2
and dismissive 2
and dismissive instead of providing assistance. 1
and dismissive. 2
and dispatched via certified mail. Any other mode of service will be deemed defective on its face. 4
and displays a severity of delinquency that conflicts with what the original creditor has on file.,,EQUIFAX 1
and displays a severity of delinquency that conflicts with what the original creditor has on file.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and disposition status. Several of these matters were dismissed 1
and dispute accessibility raises serious concerns regarding account integrity 1
and dispute communications. This is being submitted to ensure that my dispute is properly handled this time 3
and dispute remarksfor example 1
and dispute their accuracy in full. These items must be properly investigated and deleted or corrected if they can not be fully verified : XXXX XXXX Acct # XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Incorrect Late Payment Reporting History Is Wrong The following accounts are inaccurately reporting late payments. I have never made a late payment on these accounts. The reported payment history is incorrect and must be corrected 1
and dispute-handling protocols. 1
and disputed due to incorrect reporting I have filed disputes on these accounts because I believe the information is outdated 1
and disputed information from the credit file before the end of the 30-day period beginning on XX/XX/XXXX 1
and disputed the error with all three bureaus on XX/XX/year>. The bureaus ( Dispute # XXXX with XXXX ) upheld the late payment after AAFES verification 1
and disputed with Experian on XX/XX/XXXX ( Dispute XXXX XXXXXXXX ) 1
and disputed. This is commercial exploitation and unjust enrichment in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1681b and 15 U.S.C. 6801. 1
AND DISPUTES 1
and disputes. The last dispute has been opened almost 5 months 1
and disputing information that should have been corrected long ago Violation of my federally protected rights 1
and disregard for internal policy resulted in the title for my vehicle going missing and remaining missing for a period of 2 years and ultimately resulted in the inability of myself to sell the vehicle to an individual who had arranged to pay more than the remaining loan amount. 1
and disregarded by every layer of your organization while I begged for help and lived on XXXX XXXX. 1
and disregarding the pivotal fact of the account closure and very sarcastic hang up the phone after asking him for his first name. Very surprised to see this behavior 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.