2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: X

Companies starting with X that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

8.0K companies starting with "X"

Showing 851–900 of 8.0K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 34
XXXX Date of inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 3
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX & XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX,,EQUIFAX 1
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX & XXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX,,EQUIFAX 1
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX.,,EQUIFAX 1
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 3
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX & XXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX Date of inquiry XX/XX/year> 1
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/year> 2
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/year> & XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/year>,,EQUIFAX 1
XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/year> & XXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/year>,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,IN,46220,,Consent provided,Web,2024-03-18,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,8567136 1
XXXX Date XXXX Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 2
XXXX days after the due date 1
XXXX days late ( XXXX ) 1
XXXX days late in XXXX XXXX 3
XXXX days late XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$3900.00} Date Opened : XX/XX/XXXX Last XXXX Date Last XXXX late XXXX days XXXX XXXXXXXX 1
XXXX did not disclose or mention that the account had been acquired by a collections agency. Additionally 1
XXXX did not protect me and refused to take this fraud seriously Plese help! 1
XXXX discovered anomalies in the account(s) 1
XXXX does not allow this practice and has corrected the account based on my previously filed grievances.,,General Motors Financial Company 1
XXXX does not allow this practice and has corrected the account based on my previously filed grievances.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,GA,XXXXX,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2018-05-04,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,2896694 1
XXXX f/k/a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( C.D. Cal. ). Shortly after closing XXXX services mortgage loans became a wholly owned subsidiary of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. 1
XXXX FCEUA 73 P.S. 2270.4 ( b ) ) : The account shows a balance of {$430.00} on a {$200.00} credit limit 1
XXXX fee 1
XXXX Finance/Personal ( XXXX ) XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION,NJ,07202,,Consent provided,Web,2022-01-25,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5146823 1
XXXX Florida XXXX ). 1
XXXX from XXXX last year with my XXXX XXXX Yet 1
XXXX had not followed through on their end ( no surprise considering that the fraudulent charges had to have been made by one of their employees. ) Golden 1 was of no further help and the XXXX Fraud unit had disregarded my signed affidavit and essentially then called me a liar. I find it incredible that the XXXX Fraud unit could ignore and disregard my signed affidavit. That affidavit is a legal document yet it is perfectly fine for them to totally reject a legal document. Why was I instructed to file the affidavit in the first place if anybody could nullify it on a whim and speculation? I find that very disconcerting and it speaks volumes about the apparent worthlessness of legal documents! 1
XXXX has an alternate name of XXXX XXXX listed RIGHT NOW. Several inquiries that are not mine 2
XXXX has continued to verify and retain false late payment notations 1
XXXX has incorrectly charged me two times of {$1000.00} 1
XXXX has not held its duties as data furnishers and the consent order by regulatory authorities.,,SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA 1
XXXX has refused to complete the treatment as specified in the signed agreement despite receiving payment. XXXX has also been unresponsive to my calls 1
XXXX I have not supplied proof under the doctrine of estoppel by silence 3
XXXX ignored this information and refused to credit the difference. Additionally 1
XXXX In XXXX 1
XXXX information divulged to the court appears to have been simply accepted in good faith. So the final conclusion was that XXXX of millions of dollars are missing 1
XXXX insurance through escrow. 1
XXXX internal record showing post-rental vehicle swap 1
XXXX is reporting last payment as XX/XX/XXXX 2
XXXX is required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information within XXXX days 1
XXXX is specifically required to conduct comprehensive reinvestigations of disputed items 2
XXXX is XXXX to civil penalties under XXXX law XXXX at least {$100000.00} for multiple violations of A.R.S. XXXX. 2
XXXX law governs this transaction. 1
XXXX listed the last reported date as XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX made their first request for all forms 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter X that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →