2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 4.0K–4.0K of 8.9K

Company Complaints
WHICH I'LL BE SEEKING A {$1000.00} PER VIOLATION FOR DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER ( PER SE ) NEGLIGENT ENABLEMENT OF IDENTITY FRAUD. 15 USC 1681 VIOLATIONS FOR WILLFUL NONCOMPLIANCE-616 CIVIL LIABILITY FOR WILLFUL NONCOPLIANCE.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,TX,770XX,,Consent provided,Web,2022-10-04,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,6044918 1
WHICH I'LL BE SEEKING A {$1000.00} PER VIOLATION FOR DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER ( PER SE ) NEGLIGENT ENABLEMENT OF IDENTITY FRAUD. 15 USC 1681 VIOLATIONS FOR WILLFUL NONCOMPLIANCE-616 CIVIL LIABILITY FOR WILLFUL NONCOPLIANCE.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
which I'm unable to log in to use 1
which I've also sent correspondence to 1
which I've never got one. I can't believe this kind of problem can't be solved throught the internet or phone calls in the 21th century. 1
which I've since determined was not true. I left with the advice to call back the customer service number for additional follow up and was told they would look into it. To this date no one has responded 1
which Id never been aware of prior 1
which if they did a proper investigation 1
which if warned 1
which ignored it because it was not referenced on the flood insurance policy XXXX page. Flood insurers refuse to put RCVs on their policy XXXX page. Perhaps they are getting kickbacks for the fraudulent scheme as well as is Flagstar.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Flagstar Bank 1
which immediately raised suspicions. 1
which immediately rules out our participation in the events. 1
which impact my memory and my ability to process complex information. 2
which impacted my ability to secure housing 1
which impaired my judgment and reaction time to this unconscionable activity. XXXX have sided with me 1
which implements the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) 3
which implements the FDCPA. The official interpretation to 12 C.F.R. 1006.2 ( i ) of Regulation F says that a debt buyer is not considered a debt collector '' for the purposes of the FDCPA if ( 1 ) it doesn't collect debts owed or due to another and ( 2 ) doesn't have a business with the principal purpose of collecting debts. Any further action by Credence Resource Mangment will result in a lawsuit. Thank you very much.,,Kriya Capital 1
which implies illegal or excessive post-charge-off fees. I demand an itemized accounting of all charges and fees that led to this inflated balance. Unauthorized Payment Activity : A {$25.00} payment is reported in XXXX well after the account was allegedly charged off. This was not made or authorized by me 1
which imposes yet another unreasonable burden. CMG Financial has confirmed they will not provide my account number over the phone 1
which in fact he failed to do 1
which in fact it did and they told me it was not a valid report because it was not hard stamped with a seal. It is incredibly frustrating when there is a company such as Equifax that handles very important information and they cant even do a simple job correctly. I am hoping you can offer any assistance in this matter because I can not keep fighting with them much longer. 1
which in itself appears to be extremely concerning for a financial institution.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION,IL,61820,,Consent provided,Web,2025-03-04,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,12318883 1
which in itself is highly suspect and these processes '' performed were in non-disclosure to us. 1
which in my case are all incorrect. Attached is a pdf of my account and loan summary with a record of my XX/XX/XXXX payment at the bottom. There is no reason that it should take this many months for me to be able to accurately make payments on my loans.,,EdFinancial Services,MA,02138,,Consent provided,Web,2024-01-31,Closed with explanation,No,N/A,8256273 1
which in some cases could lead to identity theft. Please delete these outdated addresses and update the address with the one above. 1
which in the case of this loan 1
which in this case 2
which in this case is LVNV Funding 1
which in this case would be myself. It also states that the information on my report can not be obtained from a CREDITOR. 1
which in turn can have a significant negative impact on future borrowing costs,Company chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
which in turn influenced XXXX XXXX XXXX decision. Being reported to XXXX a consumer reporting agency governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act can significantly impact ones ability to open new accounts 1
which in turn is a stockholder of XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
which in turn will damage my credit!,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CITIBANK 1
which in XX/XX/XXXX would have cause me to bring {$0.00} to close on the grant. My income decreased 50 % 1
which in XXXX XXXX would have cause me to bring {$0.00} to close on the grant. My income decreased 50 % 1
which inaccurately reflects my payment behavior Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) 3
which inaccurately reflects my payment behavior. 8
which include : A five-year prohibition on marketing optional products 1
which included 30 % off suites ( and we got a XXXX XXXX XXXX nights ). 1
which included a note that I did not need to return the goods. The email from the merchant also indicated they were not interested in sending a return mailer for the items. However 1
which included four ( 4 ) separate documents. Two documents are dated XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX respectively. 1
which included my email address 2
which included my tuition fees 1
which included my XXXX XXXX XXXX cellular phone service 2
which included photos of what XXXX advertised versus received 1
which included sending 50 emails 1
which included taxes 1
which included the following : Trust EIN 2
which included the length of time for the refinance process and the lack of communication from KeyBank. I requested to speak to someone regarding the matter 1
which included the letter and additional checks which I did not use. She said I needed to wait until Marketing sent me another offer-letter packet to read the verbiage. She couldn't tell me when that might be. I requested that she have Marketing just send me a blank packet which was voided. She told me that she could not. I asked her to waive or reduce the fee if I paid the balance off today. She said she could not do that. I asked her to speak to her supervisor and was told that there was no one over her. ( She actually said that! ) I then asked which federal agency regulated her bank and she said I would need to do my own research. She couldn't tell me that.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CITIBANK 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related