2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: V

Companies starting with V that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

613 companies starting with "V"

Showing 401–450 of 613

Company Complaints
violates DTPA 17.46 ( b ) ( 24 ) 1
violates FCRA 1
violates FCRAs accuracy and dispute provisions. 1
violates federal law 1
violates federal law. 1
violates my rights to accurate reporting 1
violates my rights under 15 U.S.C. 1681i to a prompt and thorough review 1
violates my rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) 4
violates my rights. 1
violates regulations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) or similar laws 1
violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act. 3
violates this provision. Additionally 1
violates this section. 1
violating 12 CFR 1006.34 ( d ) and 15 USC 1681-S2 ( 7 ) ( A ). 1
violating 15 U.S. Code 1681c. You have NO permissible purpose to maintain outdated or inaccurate data. IMMEDIATELY DELETE all incorrect personal information and provide written confirmation of the corrections. 6
violating 15 U.S.C. 1681e ( b ) and Metro 2 formatting rules. 1
violating 15 U.S.C. 1681e ( b ). 1
violating 15 U.S.C. 1681e. 1
violating 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) 1
violating 15 U.S.C. 1692g ( Validation of Debts ). The failure to notify me of the re-reporting within the required 5-day window is a direct violation of federal law. Furthermore 1
violating 15 USC 1681-S 2 ( 7 ) ( A ). 1
violating 15 USC 1681s2 ( A ) ( 1 ). 3
violating 15 USC 1692a ( 2 ) communicating via any medium. FINACIAL ASSISTANCE INC ( FAI ) is continuing to invade individual privacy while continuing to commit abusive 1
violating 1681b 1
violating 1681c ( a ) 3
violating 1681i ( a ) ( 3 ) ( B ) ; Provided no evidence that a meaningful reinvestigation was conducted ; Refused to fully correct or suppress items that differ significantly from XXXX and XXXX. 1
violating 1681i ( a ) ( 6 ) This conduct is not only negligentit is willful and systemic. The bureaus have had ample notice and time to correct these errors and have instead allowed the tradeline to remain in violation of federal law. 2
violating 18 U.S.C. 894 3
violating 25 USC 6802 ( b ). This includes fraudulent acquisition of my non-public personal information 5
violating 604 ( a ) 2
violating 611s mandate for a reasonable reinvestigation and transparency. 1
violating 611s mandate for a reasonable reinvestigation and transparency. Their actions contravene established precedent 22
violating 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) 3
violating : FCRA 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) / 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) FDCPA 1692e ( 2 ) ( A ) / 15 U.S.C. 1692e ( 2 ) ( A ) Halsted consistently sent payment reminders eight days before each scheduled payment 2
violating bailment if undisclosed. As analyzed in XXXX XXXX XXXX 's * Security Interests in Deposit Accounts 1
violating both federal and state laws. I provided the credit bureaus with all necessary documentation 3
violating both the FDCPA and FCRA 623 ( b ) ( failure to conduct reasonable investigation ). 1
violating both the FTC Act and local consumer protection laws. 1
violating consumer protection laws by failing to meet its obligations under the FCRA. As per 15 U.S.C. 16811 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) 1
violating core principles of contract 1
violating credit reporting laws stating incorrect information on my public records.,,Resurgent Capital Services L.P.,CA,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2022-11-01,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6153221 1
violating credit reporting laws stating incorrect information on my public records.,,United Collection Bureau 1
violating expectations for fair and efficient consumer financial services. 1
violating fair credit practices 1
violating FCBA. 1
violating FCRA 1681e ( b ) 2
violating FCRA 1681i ( a ) and 1681s-2 ( a ). 1
violating FCRA 1681i : XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
violating FCRA 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 3 ). 3
violating FCRA 605 ( a ) which limits reporting to 7 years from the original delinquencynot the date a debt buyer acquires it. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter V that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related