2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 3.8K–3.9K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
the following types of transactions wont count : balance transfers 1
the following types of transactions wont count and wont earn points : balance transfers 1
the following was discovered : XXXX Weekly Payment Invoices ( Attach. 9-11 ) vs. XXXX XXXX XXXX Statements XXXX XXXX Supplied ( Attach. 1-3 ) XXXX - Invoices totaled {>= $1 1
the following week he confirmed when XXXX called him 1
the forbearance would apply to that period ( the period before XX/XX/2019 ). 1
the foreclosure date was set 1
the foreclosure process is essentially paused until the complete application has been fully reviewed. And if the Homeowner have decided not to keep with their Home Loan Modification process. 1
the foreclosure sale HAS NOT BEEN CANCELED. BoNY MELLON is acting as debt collector in violation of the FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT 1692 ( g ) Section809. On XXXX XXXX 1
the foreclosure sale HAS NOT BEEN CANCELED. XXXX XXXX is acting as debt collector in violation of the FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE ACT 1692 ( g ) Section809. On XXXX XXXX 1
the foreclosure sale is rescinded due to the unmarketable title. 1
the foreclosure was initiated prior to the most recent document request with no explanation 1
the foreign exchange department of the bank in XXXX asked me to request a XXXX XXXX '' amendment from PNC Bank. This is a simple document that would solve my problem. 1
the forgiven amount is considered canceled and no longer requires repayment. If there is no repayment required according to IRS guidelines 1
the form printed from their website also uses wording that suggests that submission of certain identifying information 1
the form says if filing jointly to fill the form out this way and she told me i was incorrect and that the form ( which clearly stated if file jointly fill it out this way ) ... '' is not incorrect. This is the proper way to fill out this form. I have never had this form filled out with them together. not once ''. when i expressed my concern again and that it wasn't her filing the form with the IRS 1
the form the shows our income 1
the form was submitted and I was advised they would complete the investigation within ( XXXX ) buiness days. 1
the former mortgage company I got transfer to had done a modification and had a payment I could manage 1
the fraud claim was still denied. 1
the fraud committed by the company and their representatives 1
the fraud department did the same protocol and once again told me that we did not call you ma'am and that I was being scammed. The representative then went ahead and closed my account and created a new account for me 1
the fraud department is telling the branch office that there's nothing that can be done to remedy the situation. In my opinion 1
the fraud department told us to both sign affidavits declaring that it was merely a mistake made by a man with a XXXXXXXX XXXX a fragile mind and had no malicious intent behind this. The check was issued by the bank we were standing in 1
the Fraud department would. I asked if we could speak to a member of management from the fraud department. After him calling a few different departments 1
the fraudsters deleted my daughters phone number and changed my email address to one they created. They have control of my phone number and as a result 1
the fraudulent account would be removed from my credit report. However 1
the fraudulent business practice by XXXX that NO REFUND at all cost for their financial benefit. Theres plenty of cases similar to my case on social media.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CITIBANK 1
the fraudulent check was marked NSF and I was charged a fee 1
the fraudulent information remains on my credit report. 1
the fraudulent inquiries remain on my credit reports 3
the fraudulent inquiries remained unnoticed for an extended period. This delay in detecting the fraudulent activities is a testament to the cunning methods employed by the identity thieves to evade detection. 1
the fraudulent items continue to plague my accounts. 4
the fraudulent items continue to tarnish my credit history. 3
the fraudulently spent money from my bank account but also violates a host of other state and federal law 1
the free and clear title to the vehicle showed up in the sellers name and mailbox. I notified the bank of their error 1
the free trial and any additional orders. '' And that's the way the call ended. 1
the freezing of my funds 1
the frequency and persistence of failures of compliance by the creditor 6
the frequency and persistence of the creditors noncompliance 1
the front door doesnt open 1
the frustrating part is I dont want to have to go through this each month. I feel it interferes with my account access and it increases the chance of getting a 30 day late. Such as today 1
the FSA Ombudsman Office will begin the process of reviewing requests for manual adjustments. Please note that manual account reviews can not be conducted before the automatic account adjustments are completed. However 1
the FTC 2
the FTC charged XXXX with many legal violations for their debt parking practices. 2
the FTC Identity Theft Report 3
the FTC identity theft report 1
the FTC Identity Theft Report did not have CBNA '' as the Creditor and also was not certified by the police as being part of my police report ( though I assured them I had included the FTC ID Theft report as supporting documentation to my incident report ). I asked XXXX if I could speak to her manager 2
the FTC Letter to XXXX demonstrates that my conclusions are warranted and within the parameters of the law. <P/>Accordingly 1
the FTC Refund Rules ( XXXX CFR Part XXXX ) requiring prompt full refunds when transactions can not be completed 1
the FTC Safeguards Rule 3

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →