2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 3.4K–3.4K of 13.5K

Company Complaints
the delays 1
the delinquency level its still on my report. 1
the delivery company who was bringing my belongings 1
the delivery driver forging my initials for a signature that was supposed to be directly delivered is fraud. 1
the delivery driver received a signature under XXXX XXXX 1
the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. If an amended complaint 1
the denial of accommodations 1
the denial of my right to extend credit has caused me both mental and financial distress. There are no federal laws that state a credit score can deny me my right to extend credit 3
the denial states TD AUTO FINANCE was able to verify my credit score on XX/XX/2019.,,TD BANK US HOLDING COMPANY,GA,314XX,,Consent provided,Web,2019-10-18,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3410514 1
the dentist immediately started working on my teeth without further explanation. I was not informed of the cost of the procedure 1
the Department of Complaint should do something to ease the pain and reverse the charges. So my wife wrote a letter and faxed it to the Complaint Department on the same day 1
the Department of Education calculated my monthly repayment amount again to be {$270.00} per month. I started to then pay this amount 1
the Department of Education offered an on-ramp period to ease borrowers back into repaymentthis program ended in XX/XX/XXXX. During that on-ramp period 1
the department she reached hung up on her. I contacted their regional presidents office only to get a call from a nasty-mouthed woman saying just pay your bill. 1
The Department that issue their License to operate 1
the deposit was triggered. No resolution made. Asked me to stay for a survey but after the call ended 1
the depositor and the transferor 1
the depository did open 1
the Dept. of Education 1
the derivative contract clearly identifies the parties responsible for determining whether a credit event has occurred 5
the derogatory mark needs to be removed from my credit report as it was never settled. It was paid 2
the derogatory marks associated with these alleged debts were removed from my credit report 1
the derogatory reporting is incomplete and misleading. 1
the derogatory status should no longer remain under 605 ( a ). Continued reporting without proof could be considered negligent or willful noncompliance exposing you to damages under 616 and 617. I demand this account be updated to paid/closed in good standing or removed entirely. 2
the DERROGATORY mark was removed automatically and the score jumped to XXXX points. Please see the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX source TRANSUNION XXXX screenshot with XXXX 1
the description of the procedure used to determine the accuracy and completeness of the information 1
THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE USED TO DETERMINE THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION. 2
the design had changed somewhat 1
the detailed process used in determining the validity of the information reported 1
the details 1
the details of such claim. A clear and verifiable chain of title or ownership 1
the details of the item are : a. Account Name : BC Services b. Account Number : XXXX c. Recent balance : {$1500.00} as of XX/XX/XXXX d. Date opened : XX/XX/XXXX 3. I was in shocked at this Collection Account 1
the details of which are not provided to me by Paypal. 1
the detective was unsuccessful as they would not provide the needed info to attempt to get the funds back. 1
the difference being {$1100.00}. ( Table 2 of Escrow Analysis Statement ) This over-calculation resulted in the miscalculation of future escrow requirements which is the main reason for this complaint. I will attach the escrow analysis statement and the current county tax record reflecting all of these figures 1
the difference in reporting dates for payments received can add up to $ millions in XXXX XXXX that the company may be able to keep 1
the difference the mortgage company added on top as a cushion fee for Escrow. 1
the direct loan processor at loandepot working with me 1
the direct result of you doing any of this ( and without my knowlegdge ) put me at a disadvantage. This is the whole reason for 15 U.S.C 1681 ( a ) 2 late payments under the account of XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
the direct result of you doing any of this ( and without my knowlegdge ) put me at a disadvantage. This is the whole reason for 15 U.S.C 1681 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
the directions do state that the form is an acceptable supporting document on the list of acceptable supporting documents. The directions do not state that both documents are required 1
the director of this team. 1
the Disability property tax deduction and/or the Senior property tax deduction from the Township of XXXX. Additionally 1
the disbursement did not take place until the XXXX or XXXX 1
the discharge of this debt may represent a double recovery '' situation if you have already received compensation through securitization proceeds 5
THE DISCOVER SYSTEM WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE THREE MONTHS OF ADVANCE PAYMENTS. IT WOULD STILL PROCESS PAYMENT 1. THE REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT CLEARLY CONFIRM IF ONE MADE ADVANCE OR ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS 1
the discrepancies I am disputing include incorrect balance amounts 2
the discrepancies in the Date Last Active '' and Last Reported '' fields further underscore the lack of accuracy and uniformity in the information being reported. 5
the discrepancy between the reported write-off amount and past-due amount further exacerbates the confusion surrounding the account 's status 1
the dispute by the second agent being closed without research because it took too long to be initiated because of the first agent 's error ) ... my goodness. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related