2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 3.0K–3.0K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
the credit bureau 's negative report might negatively affect my job due to reasons that I can not explain here. 1
the credit bureau again responded with a brief statement saying that XXXX had verified the account as accurate. No documents were provided to me. There was no evidence that any records were reviewed. The response appeared to be automated or superficial. 1
the credit bureau can not list it as a negative on your credit report. XXXX has NOT and CAN NOT validate this debt. They put this negative collection account on my credit report in XX/XX/XXXX 2
the credit bureau disputes team investigated this account and determined it to be valid and reporting accurately. XXXX XXXX has also disputed through the major credit bureaus. Our investigations have consistently verified the accuracy of the reported tradeline. XXXX has spoken directly with XXXX XXXX about these disputes 1
the credit bureau has not properly verified or deleted the inaccurate account in compliance with the law. 7
the credit bureau is obligated to ensure the accuracy of the information reported. Despite these clear legal requirements 2
the credit bureau is required to : ( i ) promptly delete or modify that item as appropriate 3
the credit bureau is required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation and remove any item that can not be verified with reliable documentation. I have not been provided any verifiable documentation by either the original creditor or the furnisher of these accounts proving that I am legally responsible for these debts. In particular 1
the credit bureau is required to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation to verify the information. Experians refusal to fulfill this obligation is a clear violation of my consumer rights under the FCRA.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,FL,328XX,,Consent provided,Web,2024-10-02,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,10326639 1
the credit bureau must conduct a reasonable reinvestigation of the disputed information within 30 days. 2
the credit bureau must conduct a reasonable reinvestigation to verify the information. Transunions failure to fulfill this obligation is a direct violation of the FCRA.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
the credit bureau must delete the information. According to 15 U.S. Code 1692g ( a ) in the section of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) 1
the credit bureau must investigate the disputed information within 30 days. If the information can not be verified as accurate 1
the credit bureau must provide 1
the credit bureau must remove it within 4 business days of receiving the request and the necessary documentation. 4
the credit bureau must use reasonable procedures to ensure maximum accuracy of my file. I insist on immediate verification 1
the credit bureau representatives purport that none of the phone numbers that are on your credit report is the one on your account for the fraud alert. This is institutional discrimination which prevents us from accessing working capital and the like. 2
the credit bureaus and data furnishers must investigate and correct or remove inaccurate 1
the credit bureaus and XXXX XXXX must investigate and correct or remove inaccurate 2
the credit bureaus continue to send me erroneous letters outlining their investigation but has refused to outline what was or what was not validated. They have refused to follow both State and Federal governing laws. I have requested and demanded for them to follow statue and they have refused.,,EQUIFAX 1
the credit bureaus continue to send me erroneous letters outlining their investigation but has refused to outline what was or what was not validated. They have refused to follow both State and Federal governing laws. I have requested and demanded for them to follow statue and they have refused.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,CA,92679,,Consent provided,Web,2025-01-05,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,11386642 1
the credit bureaus continue to send me erroneous letters outlining their investigation but has refused to outline what was or what was not validated. They have refused to follow both State and Federal governing laws. I have requested and demanded for them to follow statue and they have refused.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
the credit bureaus erroneously flagged these accounts 3
the credit bureaus have 30 days from receipt ( XX/XX/XXXX ) to investigate and/or remove and block the fraudulent accounts/inquiries. 1
the credit bureaus have 30 days from receipt ( XX/XX/XXXX ) to investigate and/or remove and block the fraudulent accounts/inquiries. 1
the credit bureaus have continued to defame my name 3
the credit bureaus have delayed action and requested further documentation 3
the credit bureaus have failed to properly investigate this matter and continue to report these fraudulent accounts. 3
the credit bureaus have failed to remove the inquiries from my report. I ONLY AUTHORIZED XXXX TO RUN MY CREDIT 1 TIME. ON XX/XX/XXXX WHEN I APPLIED ONLINE. 1
the credit bureaus have not removed it. 3
the credit bureaus have outright rejected my request 3
the credit bureaus may have violated federal law. 3
the credit bureaus must ensure the maximum possible accuracy of the information they report. These inquiries do not reflect my actions 2
the credit bureaus responded with a generic statement claiming the account had been verified as accurate. 1
the credit bureaus simply responded that the account was verified 1
the credit card account is accelerated to an external law office and I am told there is no way it can be reversed by a nasty-style-of-communication rep named XXXX in the legal department. When I called the insensitive 1
the credit card block takes so much time to resolve that I lose a time-limited discount price. 1
the credit card company said that the XXXX is responding that i never asked for the refund and closed the case without telling me 1
The credit card company won't due any further investigation to get to the bottom line of who stole my credit card / Identity. Per upgrade they don't look or request video footage they don't investigate that far!! XXXX XXXX XXXX is being very hostile. I have filed 2 police reports and will file another police report stating the card mailed out on XX/XX/XXXX 1
the credit card company would hold the fraudulent merchant responsible. Here 1
The Credit card is my social security card. This is the credit card I used to originate every consumer credit transaction below. They should alb removed from my consumer report pursuant to 15 usc 1681a ( 2 ) ( B ). I am demanding that they remove this transaction from my report immediately as they are a violation of my rights as a federally protected consumer under title 15 chapter 41. 6
The Credit card is my social security card. This is the credit card I used to originate every consumer credit transaction below. They should all be removed from my consumer report pursuant to 15 usc 1681a ( 2 ) ( B ). I am demanding that you remove these transactions from my report immediately as they are a violation of my rights as a federally protected consumer under title 15 chapter 41.,,EQUIFAX 1
The Credit card is my social security card. This is the credit card I used to originate every consumer credit transaction below. They should all be removed from my consumer report pursuant to 15 usc 1681a ( 2 ) ( B ). I am demanding that you remove these transactions from my report immediately as they are a violation of my rights as a federally protected consumer under title 15 chapter 41.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
the credit card issuer 1
the credit company takes it free of any claim or defense which the buyer would have against the seller. This is true unless the buyer can prove that the credit company is acting in bad faith or with notice of actual seller misconduct. Second 1
the credit file of one or other individuals can be totally or nearly merged out of existence. 3
the credit file of one or other individuals can be totally or nearly merged out of existence. Mixed and Merged Credit Files are a well-recognized issue at all major credit bureaus Generally 2
the credit file of XXXX or other individuals can be totally or nearly merged out of existence. Mixed and Merged Credit Files are a well-recognized issue at all major credit bureaus Generally 1
THE CREDIT GRANTOR MAY NOT KNOW HOW TO CONTACT YOU TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER. THE CREDIT GRANTOR REQUESTS THAT YOU CONTACT THEM DIRECTLY .... '' See Exhibit 5. SIMON 'S AGENCY INC. already knew how to get in contact with me. 1
the credit is still not available. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →