2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 7.7K–7.7K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
these inquiries must be deleted immediately. 1
these inquiries must be removed for failure to meet compliance standards. Despite my previous disputes 1
these inquiries require provable permissible purpose with my direct authorization 2
these instruments are valid as negotiable instruments 1
these issues persist on my ChexSystems report. 1
these items constitute XXXX XXXX fraudulent reporting and must be removed.,,EQUIFAX 1
these items have been verified without proof 2
these items must be deleted from my credit report. 1
these items must be immediately removed from my credit reports. 1
these items must be permanently deleted. 2
these items must be removed immediately. 3
these items remain verified. I questioned why the bureau verified these items without obtaining the necessary documentation 3
these items should have been deleted when proper verification could not be provided. 3
these items were being sold under one of their big promotions 1
these items were called charge backs on my account and no one could explain to me what this meant-maybe you had an amount out there for that amount and it is being returned 1
these late entries appear inconsistent. I request a reinvestigation of both months and correction to reflect paid as agreed 2
these late payments were reported to the credit bureaus 1
these lates can not legally remain on my report Instruction : Reinvestigate and remove or correct the inaccurate late payment history immediately ACCOUNT XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX Date Opened : XX/XX/XXXX Balance : {$3600.00} Late Payment Law : FCRA Section 611 and Section 609 give me the right to dispute and request verification Issue : Late payment history is inaccurate Story : I dispute the lates being reported because no signed agreement 1
these legal exchanges have underscored the stark violation of the Pennsylvania Fair Credit Extension Uniformity Act ( PFCEUA ) and federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ). Notably 1
these letters states that my FICO score was obtained from XXXX 1
these loans do not qualify as true education loans per the bankruptcy code. Therefore 1
these misstatements are punishable as perjury under 18 U.S.C. 1621. The items found within my credit report that I listed on the following pages are not related to any transaction that I made. I am alleging that a person or company- without my authorization- used my personal identifying information to apply for goods 2
these must be deleted In conclusion these multiple errors and violations have caused me unjustified harm and financial distress the credit bureaus and furnishers have clearly failed to meet their obligations under federal laws I am requesting the CFPB to demand a full reinvestigation of each item removal of all inaccurate information and potential punitive action against any party that continues to violate consumer protection statutes thank you for your attention and swift action in resolving these matters.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
these must be deleted XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Hard Inquiry Law Issue : FCRA 604 and 615 Requires consumer authorization Story : I did not apply for credit with XXXX on this date and therefore did not authorize this inquiry. Please remove it if authorization can not be proven XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Hard Inquiry Law Issue : FCRA 604 ( a ) ( 2 ) and 607 Must be initiated by consumer Story : This inquiry was unauthorized and I request that XXXX XXXX XXXX Finance provide evidence of my application. Otherwise 1
these past periods should be applied to loans when they are separated 1
these payments shows to be processed on XX/XX/XXXX : XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX CITI Payment Payment XXXX {$3000.00} Bank XXXX XXXX XXXX CITI PAYMENT XXXX : PAYMENT ( ID : CITIXXXX XXXX ) {$6100.00} Citizens Bank - PREAUTHORIZED DEBIT CITI PAYMENT PAYMENT {$3000.00} XXXX XXXX- I started to have trouble processing my credit card and was notified via email that my credit card has been cancelled. Apparently the old 3 checks for the XXXX payment finally arrived at Citi after the checks had been cancelled with my banks and Citi tried to cash them. They had already been cancelled and therefore Citi cited this as a reason to shut down my credit card. I would like to reiterate that I cancelled the checks at the suggestion of Citi 's Customer Service Department. 1
these people ripped off people during the holidays. I am a hard working mom who was buying a XXXX present for my husband. It is sad and upsetting. 1
these positions could not be used to qualify our mortgage loan application as we would not be receiving paystubs until 90+ days after our scheduled closing date. Given that we already had relayed that we'd like to use our current jobs to qualify for the loan 1
these practices may amount to violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 1
these practices,,EQUIFAX 1
these processes are only a means of stonewalling the removal of PMI from the above mortgage. 1
these programs are a way for AES and other government finance agencies to earn income from American Citizens. 1
these promissory notes do not disclose any adequate amount of the finance charge 1
these receivables are then transferred to Discover Card XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Subsequently 1
these repeated declined payments made me suspicious of my bank 1
these report are all showing inaccurate information and they are missing information and not reporting 100 % accurate per the FCRA please delete from all three credit bureau 2
these reported lates can not be considered accurate. Failing to ensure complete validation makes the bureau complicit in false reporting. Any continued publication of unverified late payments is a willful violation of federal law 1
these representations were false. 1
these representatives are debt collectors 1
these same inquiries were subsequently reinserted into my credit file without any proper explanation or the required reinvestigation notices 1
these suggestions will take longer to cure.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL,NC,28079,,Consent provided,Web,2022-07-29,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5779830 1
these things are not waived and if you don't have an updated ledger 1
these things take time to cycle through. 1
these tradelines are now flagged as UNDER DISPUTE '' despite no disputes being initiated or authorized by me whatsoever. 1
these transactions qualify as unauthorized electronic fund transfers. The burden of proving authorization rests with the financial institution. As a senior citizen under California law 1
these transactions took place while my money clip WAS NOT in my possession and I would surely NOT authorize such ridiculous amounts on 3 credit cards almost totaling $ XXXX! They were stolen and used for a period of time by the staff after they XXXX me. Moreover 1
these transfers were inexplicably halted due to audits initiated by your compliance team. 1
these two card might be missing by the fault of XXXX since we have many delivery issues with XXXX already. 1
these two charges were removed from my account/bill. However 1
these two firms are deliberately absolving themselves of any responsibility for correcting errors in the transaction that they committed. They choose to punish rather than listen to customers! By doing so -they forego the opportunity for improvement in this aspect of transaction for a large number of transactions 2

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →