2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 7.2K–7.3K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
there should be no charge for this notification or for the corrected copy of my report. Finally 1
there should be no charge for this notification or the corrected copy of my report. Finally 2
there should be no charge for this report. 4
there should be no charge for this report. I have enclosed all of the accounts If you do not remove this items in a timely matter I will file a law suit under section 617 under the color of the law. 1
there should be no fees to process as I did my due diligence to make it whole within a reasonable time. US BANK does not give its customers this. They do not care what financial situation there customers are in because greed 1
there should be no further wait time for this clear merchant error. Why is the consumer disadvantaged in a clear case of merchant error? 1
there should be no need for a dispute. Once again 1
there should be no outstanding balance on an account that is legally uncollectible. 1
there should be some grace given to us with the difficult position we are put in.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,NJ,07410,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2025-02-11,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,12042693 1
there should be some video to track the suspect. When I search online 1
there should have been a warning message prior to each transaction to make sure customers fully understand the potential risk and the proper procedures to follow. 1
there should have been additional internal review by the Discover dispute team prior to pushing this to arbitration given their own internal error. 1
there should have been diligence completed to know what was/ was not available or an option. Not run my credit 1
there should not be ANY EVICTION '' done and applied to my credit. 2
there should NOT be any activity after the account is closed or charged off -- - yet some of these are incorrect 3
there shouldn't be a past due amount as past due amounts are only applicable to open accounts.,,CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,TX,76063,,Consent provided,Web,2022-12-05,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6277838 1
there shouldn't be a past due amount as past due amounts are only applicable to open accounts.,,EQUIFAX 1
there shouldn't be a past due amount as past due amounts are only applicable to open accounts.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
there was a charge for {$25.00} from XXXX dated XX/XX/XXXX and posted on XX/XX/XXXX. I spoke with an agent at CaptialOne Mastercard named XXXX to dispute this particular charge. Since that date 1
there was a communication issue with the staff at Wells Fargo and the XXXX XXXX XXXX. My client showed me his available balance in his XXXX of XXXX and the funds were good. 1
there was a false signature on the report. Neither they had my permission 1
there was a KILL CHAIN and reverse put on the $ XXXX. Unfortunately 1
there was a long silence 1
there was a new door lock with a lockbox attached to the backdoor. 1
there was a past due balance on the account 1
there was a police report submitted to the Property Management Company to deem me not responsible for vandalism done to the home 1
there was a technical issue 1
there was a term stating If you transfer a balance with this offer 1
there was a trade in ) / Drivers : my son and me only & the truck runs good ) while the truck was in the shop with a promise '' all would be fixed. Over the next 3 weeks it was back at the dealership 4 times 2
there was a XXXX file for a business loan under my name for a different company called XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX with my authentic signature. Had Amex compared them 1
there was a {$100.00} fee associated with it from my bank. My account now sits at {$0.00}. 1
there was absolutely no damage to the building and XXXX Florida was warned weeks prior to the natural disaster that Irma was going to be a Category 4 or worst. I was still mislead time and time again that the loan would be approved. There was also a follow up inspection conducted to prove that the building was in the same condition that it was prior to the storm. Staff from Flagstar advised me that I was denied because the building was located in natural disaster area and that it did not matter that there were no damages to the building. 1
there was already a lien on my title that has nothing to do with me. They sold me a car knowing that a lien already existed between their Issuer 1
there was an additional interest charge of {$10.00}. This interest was calculated on a balance of {$720.00} ( no reconciliation provided ) at a rate of XXXX XXXX for what appears to be 30 days. At this point 1
there was an excess of close to {$3900.00} in the escrow account attached to this mortgage. After reading your response 1
there was an unauthorized release of my personal information by The XXXX to third parties without my consent 1
there was an unauthorized release of my personal information by XXXX XXXX to third parties without my consent 1
there was another unauthorized direct deposit in the amount of around {$25000.00} 1
there was delinquency way before XX/XX/XXXX. Experian was supposed to investigate where the {$2700.00} began out of the {$4200.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX is trying to pursue. is in violation of FCRA law.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,AZ,85053,,Consent provided,Web,2024-12-06,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,11059142 1
there was most assuredly a requirement to provide me with an adverse action notice stating the credit reporting agency that was used and the REASON as required by the FCRA. 1
there was much debate about applying my wifes financial affidavit on the application. I told them adamantly 1
there was never a fraud claim made and certainly not on XX/XX/2023 1
there was never a loan estimate provided 1
there was never a proper investigation in the beginning to make sure this information belonged to me 1
there was no ability to make payments on accounts while this issue was in existence. I was assured that the IT team would get the issue fixed soon 1
there was no amount or anything put into that section. Also 1
there was no answer or understanding as to why there was a delay. I complained about the lack of communications and lack of solutions. The representative turned to blame to XXXX for not accepting the funds '' - which should be incorrect as the account was already verified. The rep also blamed me for not having enough funds- which was wrong since I had specifically sold investments and transferred funds to the HSA specifically for this purpose. This person did not offer any solutions or suggested any actions so that my reimbursement would be processed. I had to come up with potential solutions to receive my money back. I suggested using another of my previously used accounts as recipient of my funds. The representative said that should work. So 1
there was no appraisal done on the home nor was I ever notified that the Original Value '' of the home was to change from the original loan conditions. I received no disclosures of any kind nor was I notified of a new PMI Automatic Termination '' date. The servicing of the loan had been taken over by Seterus XXXX Inc. shortly after the modification. I noted that interestingly 1
there was no area that I could re-open this return 1
there was no availability on the date I requested to use the timeshare 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →