2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 6.9K–6.9K of 13.5K

Company Complaints
then this constitutes an unlawful and deceptive collection practice. 1
then this contract is not legally binding. Therefore 1
then threatened to send me to collections. 1
then to confirm the purchase. He then stated I would get confirmation that this was sent to an account enrolled with XXXX. I received the confirmation and notified the Caller 1. Caller 1 then asked that I screenshot the confirmation and text to phone number XXXX. I followed these instructions and Caller 1 confirmed receiving my payment. 1
then to customer service 1
then to DELETE the account from my consumer profile. 1
then to say that the wire for {$2500.00} was cancelled 1
then to the balance transfer 1
then to XXXX 1
then to XXXX 3. Financial Impact To make these investments 1
then to XXXX XXXX. Financial Impact To make these investments 2
then told Oh well 1
then told by each representative following 1
then told me she would discuss this with management and I would hear back from someone. She also told me that I needed to send in proof of payment clearing from my bank to AmeriSave because they could not see it on their end. She also told me to contact HUD for assistance. This call lasted for 51 minutes and 38 seconds. 1
then told me that I could request expedited delivery of the card if I called back tomorrow 1
then told me that since the promo code was from last month 1
then TOYOTA MOTOR CORP is in violation of 15 USC 1681 and FCRA. Consumer has suffered adverse action from potential creditors and financiers as a result of negative reporting on consumer credit report for years which has impacted mental 1
then transfer me 1
then transfer you and nothing ever gets resolved with them. It's a game they play and they are ripping off the American consumer with unethical customer service. 1
then transferred me back to general customer service 1
then transferred most of the funds out of my business savings account. 1
then transferred to XXXX who is the manager 1
then TransUnion is not meeting its duty of maximum possible accuracy under 15 U.S.C. 1681e ( b ) and must delete the entry. 1
then tried to transfer {$990.00} to the fraudulent XXXX account. That {$990.00} was declined 1
then Tuesday XX/XX/XXXX as Day 3 1
then turn around and do it again. Isnt this considered double dipping? Another unfair advantage for banking customers!! 1
then turned around and reported me late. XXXX then told me that they could not correct their wrongful credit reporting for up to 30 days! This is absolutely unacceptable. What happened to FAIR CREDIT REPORTING? At this point 1
then under IRS regulations and Publication XXXX 3
then used a backend rule to cancel it. Not a front-end eligibility block. 1
then verification and a lengthy auto recorded message and holding for a rep to answer. I stated to them what XXXX told me but they did not know what to do about it. 1
then verification was needed ; including your ID 1
then wait a week or two before Equifax would respond. 1
then was cut off XX/XX/XXXX XXXX : requested XXXX XXXX contact me 1
then was informed after requesting to be transferred to leadership that the system they use to do so was malfunctioning and that they'd have to call me back. She also ( falsely ) told me that customer service reps could not look up account information based on people 's phone numbers 1
then was told to go to the branch I opened the account in but the banker assigned ot me was out of town. Another nearby branch manager went to take a look but then she was going out of town so she had a business banker go on the phone with me with customer service. I literally on that phone call spent XXXX min asking for an explanation of just XXXX overdraft charge that was assessed on XX/XX/XXXX ( By this point I have noticed fees were being assessed throughout the whole year when as one can see from the balances on the statements 1
then we can approve a new card 1
then we can transfer the money to his new account. '' Well guess what 1
then we followed-up and were asked to call back on XX/XX/XXXX. Again on XX/XX/XXXX and was told they had put in a request and to call back on XX/XX/XXXX. It seems they have no intention of resolving this issue and instead are attempting to force us into escrow. 1
then we have to receive our money back since we have not received the exchange service as clearly written in the contract. They have not answered. 1
then we kept talking about the first damage and the first check 1
then we received it then we deposit it 1
then we would have been able to record the closing by XXXX. 1
then Wells Fargo employees should go to prison AND THE COMPANY SHOULD PAY A FINE because GFE is not considered FACTUAL. You 've admitted that you KNEW that the application WAS NOT FACTUAL and you still covered the scam by lying to solidify the fact that THE OFFICIAL FHA application is just a Good Faith ESTIMATE. It is indeed a FEDERAL CRIME to KNOWINGLY submit NON-FACTUAL INFORMATION on FHA Case Number XXXX XXXX. On the same appllication it states that I have {$.00} debt. Would over XXXX $ owed to creditors be considered a Good Faith Estimate? Amount of Mortgages and liens that I owe is {$.00} Now XXXX states that my ( XXXX ) was used to pay previous mortgages. The application then asks that tha Total liens and unpaid loan balances total {$.00} Good Faith Estimates? 1
then Wells Fargo will process the lowest dollar amount first 1
then what am I paying on? How can I log into my account and see a steadily decreasing balance since early 2013 ( currently at {$4700.00} XXXX? How can they welcome me to continue to pay voluntarily '' on a balance they took the option to write off? How can they claim a loss '' and get whatever accounting wizardry benefit from it 1
then what happened to the 2nd promotion period bonus points? Now I was told that the matter would be escalated for resolution. 1
then what is the reason. He indicated that not being interested is not the same as denied 1
then what was the intent behind this action? Please provide a detailed and logical explanation 1
then when I checked my bank statement it would say minus {$50.00} due to a mobile deposit adjustment '' or chargeback ''. An irate employee - XXXX XXXX - from one of the companies I work for - XXXX - called me to complain about a chargeback for XXXX XXXX. I explained to her that it was the bank 's fault 1
then when I declined and submitted more evidence to them 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related