2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: S

Companies starting with S that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

5.5K companies starting with "S"

Showing 5.4K–5.5K of 5.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
Superior Holdings, LLC 17
Superior Home Loans, Inc. 2
Superior Settlement Services LLC 2
supervisor 1
Supervisor 1
Supervisor of Lien Release 1
Supervisor XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
supervisor XXXX XXXX cordially informed me that JP Morgan Chase executive office does not have a phone number ( I guess company is saving money buy not having to buy phones for that office building ). 1
Supervisor XXXX XXXX.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,TX,79423,,Consent provided,Web,2022-09-26,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6015040 1
supervisor/management 1
supervisors 4
Supervisors that I could submit a bill dispute to the Office of the Customer Advocate. Ref chart column P. 1
Supervisors XXXX 1
supervisory action 1
supplemental and additional data omitted illegally from my paper credit report but included in Metro 2 files in XXXX XXXX showed that I had been 60 days past due with a 100% perfect which is not only illogical but impossible as I have always had a perfect payment record on every account. Numerous credit scoring and credit data analysis firms such as XXXX XXXX access Metro 2 credit data to report scores and account changes and payment records. Metro 2 coding errors and data concealed from paper credit reports prevents errors from being known and corrected by consumers in willful violation of the FCRA. Metro 2 is available to lenders who use information concealed from consumers which most likely contains inaccurate data such as late payments. My credit score was 200+ points below what it should have been due to the concealed and inaccurate 60 day late payment inside Metro 2 and concealed from my paper reports. I have complained to every CRA and the improper verification responses have been to ask me what data is incorrect instead of researching my Metro 2 data to tell me what data is in Metro 2 that is concealed from my paper credit reports. Consumers are scammed by Metro 2 inaccurate data concealed from paper reports resulting in a systematic inappropriate reporting system in substantial and known violation of laws including the FCRA. In fact 1
supplied to Equifax 1
supply duly signed documents 4
supply the following within * * 15 days * * if a bureau contends it verified the account : 1. Furnishers * * name 1
supplying paystubs 1
support 1
support conversations disappeared or could not be resumed. 1
support payments 1
support/staff 1
supported by 15 USC 6801 1
supported by actual evidence such as signed agreements 2
supported by documentation and a police report 1
supported by evidence from their response and the original loan agreement ( attached for reference ). 1
supported by my FTC report and XXXX verification. Under FCRA 1681c-2 1
supported by XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
supporting documentation 1
supporting my claim. I reached out again to the BOA fraud department and requested the reason for the denial and within XXXX days they came back ( via phone call only ) and advised I would not get my money back and they were closing the case. Although I again requested a reason 1
supporting my position and experience. Please correct the error on my account promptly. 1
supporting my position. Please reinvestigate this these matters and correct the disputed items as soon as possible. 1
supporting their client 1
supports the position that continuing to report a debt after a cease and desist request 1
supposed to be for the people 1
supposedly 1
supposedly for a XXXX subscription spanning from XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/year>. Upon discovering the unauthorized charge 1
supposedly for security reason ( s ). I was sent an E-Mail 1
supposedly to prevent further damage and stop the unauthorized activity. 1
supposedly to XXXX 's per our escrow statement. Chase proceeded to do escrow review on XX/XX/XXXX and based our escrow needs for XXXX off the second {$630.00} payment AND NOT THE CORRECT ANNUAL PREMIUM OF {$5800.00}. Following this review 1
supposedly. They will not show me these photos. 1
supposedly.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL,MI,48101,,Consent provided,Web,2021-10-14,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4808136 1
supposedlyXXXX XXXX could ask for their money back up to 20 subsequent business days???? and that would thus leave Discover in a negative position is they sent roughly half of the {$15000.00} back to the exact same account from which it came. ( Please note however : XXXX tells me possible retraction-revocation could occur no more than 5 business days and NOT XXXX business days as Discovered personnel claimed ). On Saturday 1
suppress 2
suppressed 1
suppressing 3
suppressing my credit score and affecting my ability to access fair credit terms. 1
suppressing my XXXX XXXX and affecting my ability to access fair credit terms. 1
SUPPRESSION 2

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter S that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →