2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 24.3K–24.3K of 25.6K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
it forces the account to capitalize interest ( the most recent delay made them over {$5000.00} in interest ). Over {$120000.00} of my student loan balance is due to interest and capitalized interest. When the delay is of their own making 1
it forces you to make a payment via XXXX mail 1
it found. Predatory lending becomes a crime in California when the lender manages the loan transaction to extract the maximum value for itself without regard for the borrower 's ability to repay the loan. Generally speaking 1
it freezes on Loading '' 1
it further decreased to XXXX as of XX/XX/XXXX. 2
it gave me a false impression that I was making an informed financial decision. I contacted the dealership again to acquire final pricing 1
it gets applied to the whole loan and is not used to push due dates in order for the company to accrue interest on the consumers highest interest loan. Based on my payments with Firstmark services 1
it gives the false impression that the account was charged off without resolution 1
it goes for anywhere between {$4000.00} - {$5000.00}. I highly doubt that if the first package was not received 1
it goes nowhere. It's just sales tactics when I try to talk to an actual person for help. 1
it goes on deaf ears and I am suffering the consequence of the perfect example of incompetence in the workplace. 1
it goes straight to voicemail! The XXXX is a few days from now and its not looking like I'll be able to reach the specialist any time soon. This is so unfair and unprofessional.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,BANK OF AMERICA 1
it goes to voicemail. A request to set a specific time to call & discuss this matter by email 2
it had been determined that there was no error made in credit reporting because the loan came over to Mr. Cooper on XX/XX/XXXX from XXXX XXXX XXXX and was already 30 days past due. I explained to her that the loan would NOT have been 30 days past due 1
it had been determined that there was no error made in credit reporting because the loan came over to Mr. Cooper on XX/XX/XXXX from XXXX XXXX XXXX and was already 30 days past due. I explained to her that the loan would NOT have been 30 days past due 1
it had been determined that there was no error made in credit reporting because the loan came over to XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX from XXXX XXXX XXXX and was already 30 days past due. I explained to her that the loan would NOT have been 30 days past due 1
it had been lifted by the wind and was off the piers 1
it had been put on hold by mistake. He also confirmed the contract had been expired for a long time ( more detailed information in the letter attached I sent to the corporate office ). I never got any response from XXXX in writing. Over the phone 1
it had been XXXX since XX/XX/XXXX. On XXXX my friend called capital one to inquire on why the funds are bank in her account and they were to be returned to my account 1
it had in fact not been started at all. And now I was stuck having to start the whole process over again with a new loan servicer. 1
it had n't. On my PayPal account site for some reason 1
it had nothing to do with business. At which point she picks up the check with a rude look on her face and looks at the check and shrugs her shoulders and says oh 1
it had taken PENFED 30+ days to provide mortgage denial - as I was very proactive and timely in providing necessary documentation and communicating. Though 1
it had the XXXX with a cross through it and said it was rejected 1
it had to be a theft. The note was not a gift without my knowledge. The banks create money ( bank IOUs ) based on a borrowers promise to repay. The publication then explains how the alleged borrower 's promissory note and secured collateral gives the newly created bank IOU value. The banks create money against the value of those IOUs. '' The IOUs they are referring to are the alleged borrower 's promissory notes. It continues to explain how banks are monetizing debt. Monetizing is simply explained as creating a new bank IOU ( called new money ) to match a promissory note ( IOU ) to repay the loan. The publication then admits 3
it had to provide information and detail supporting its claim that Investor did not participate. SPS had to provide any underwriting guidelines or requirements or restrictions as well as the specifics utilized in calculating eligibility such as interest rate 1
it has an adjustable interest rate like an open-ended card account and as such the portion of total amount due that is applied to both principal interest varies with changes interest rates set by the Federal Reserve XXXX There have been five ( 5 ) in-total over the time period when Firstmark was mailing statements and payment reminders to incorrect addresses. Therefore 1
it has basically yielded nothing. I still do not have my credit score fixed with Experian and I have not received my 1099. 1
it has become an XXXX '' on my credit report. 3
it has become deliberate 1
it has been 2 weeks since last call 1
it has been 30 days since my original dispute was sent. XXXX has not provided any of the requested documentation by physical mail 2
it has been a burden. And thats not great. Why would a company do people that way? Im hurt. I dont know what to do or where to go. All I know is.. I deserve my title because my car has been paid off months ago. It isnt fair what Brigdecrest has done to me. I need answers 1
it has been a financial catastrophe effect because of this one incident. Since 1
it has been a financial nightmare and mentally damaging. 1
it has been a nightmare with this company. All the phones have only voice mail. We never heard from these people as to how someone takes advantage of their package. To make it worst 1
it has been almost 8 months ( will be on XX/XX/XXXX ) since I submitted my manuscript to the merchant and I have received nothing. 1
it has been an exceptionally terrible experience. This is sad for many reasons. I am an excellent customer with UWM. I pay my mortgage payments in full and on-time. I've never had any issue and only great things to say about UWM previous to the Assumption packet process. 1
it has been anything but smooth. You can easily look through the file notes and see how many times I have called 1
it has been erroneously reported as an account in violation. 2
it has been marred by those that give false 1
it has been more than 2 months with my account restricted and my funds not released. 1
it has been more than 6 months now 1
it has been over 30 days and I have not heard back from them 1
it has been over a month since the original reissuance request was made and it feels like I am getting the run-around. Nearly three thousand dollars of mine is being held and I very much need that money. At this point I am not sure where else to turn 1
it has been paid in full for over a year. They can not produce any documentation regarding this amount they say I owe. I called XXXX XXXX XXXX and they do not show that I have a past due balance. 1
it has been six day including today. I just called them again for the seven times. There is nothing they could do 1
it has been two weeks now of no response 1
it has been very frustrating not being able to speak with someone with authority.,,NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,CA,92028,,Consent provided,Web,2015-08-12,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1516060 1
it has caused numerous man-hours in creating this and other reports for review by various legal and regulatory bodies. In short 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →