| it comes out of closing | 1 | 0.0% | a XXXX and XXXX came by and notarized all of our signatures on the paperwork and sent it back to your company. On XX/XX/XXXX |
| it connects to Resurgent. The actual corporate entity that claims I owe them money has never responded to my demands for validation and is impossible to contact | 1 | 0.0% | which claim they manage the accounts for LVNV |
| it constitutes a direct violation of federal law and must be deleted. | 4 | 0.0% | you are legally obligated under FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) [ 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ] to ensure that any information you furnish to a consumer reporting agency is accurate and complete. Furthermore |
| it constitutes willful neglect of your obligations under federal law. I demand that this address be permanently deleted without delay to bring my credit file into compliance with FCRA. | 1 | 0.0% | complete |
| it continues to be reported to your credit bureau | 1 | 0.0% | and again on XX/XX/year> |
| it continues to grow. This is extremely distressing | 1 | 0.0% | I suffered from a serious medical condition that forced me to be out of work for about six months. In XXXX the economy was starting the downward spiral |
| it could also result in possibly having to go into a default status causing a major negative impact to mine and my co-borrowers credit report. | 1 | 0.0% | I sent in my forbearance request to a XXXX XXXX XXXX of University Accounting Service ( UAS ) by email on XX/XX/XXXX as per her request and was told it will take 10-14 days to process. We are now past that 14 days and I still have not heard anything. Then |
| it could be a legitimate charge so I wanted to make sure it was indeed an ATM withdrawal and get any more information Any attempts to call paypal have resulted in going on the same loop over and over with the AI chatbot and there is no formal process to get the answers on what this charge is | 1 | 0.0% | simply wanting more information on the charge- where it was made |
| it could be a scam. | 1 | 0.0% | the money would go to XXXX |
| it could be another 7 - 10 days. I said unacceptable. He seemed pretty nonchalant about it. I said put yourself in my shoes. He repeated that legally they couldn't start anything to trace the check until 8 days had passed from the processing date. | 1 | 0.0% | XX/XX/XXXX |
| it could be insignificant | 1 | 0.0% | confirming that we can proceed with closing and she informed me that we will not receive a closing date and time and view the closing disclosure until we can schedule an exact timeframe. I informed her of when my preference would be and she replied that they are currently waiting for my husband`s employment confirmation from HR. The amount of closing cost that XXXX gave me in the email was {$5300.00} |
| it could be thousands as recently it was reported that XXXX homeowners are still on some type of Forbearance Program and if mortgage servicers such as XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX are not policed in regard to XXXX Funding | 1 | 0.0% | but Shellpoint was giving me a deadline of XX/XX/XXXX to avoid my past due mortgage loan going into foreclosure. I strongly believe this was done intentionally by Shellpoint as they had no intention of wanting to receive funding from XXXX to bring a mortgage loan current as they much prefer to be able to foreclose on the property as this would be much more financially beneficial for the mortgage servicer such as XXXX XXXX XXXX Bank and Shellpoint. I also strongly believe the number of foreclosures will soon be projected to be staggering |
| it could fall off. This is an unacceptable response. | 1 | 0.0% | including impersonation |
| it could have been months until we caught this fraudulent accounting being done by Ocwen. | 1 | 0.0% | and this fraudulent modification |
| it could have saved us a significant amount of money and prevented any pending foreclosure. But the main point here is that our right to know about all mortgage loss mitigation options was taken away | 1 | 0.0% | my offers to mediate or meet have encompassed a range of critical issues that demand attention : XXXX. Violations of dual tracking |
| it could lend me {$2400.00}. This is deceptive | 1 | 0.0% | the rate would have been capped at 20-30 %. In the interest of Cash Centrals profits |
| it could limit our ability to access the securitization markets. Additional factors affecting the extent to which we may securitize our credit card receivables in the future include the overall credit quality of our receivables | 1 | 0.0% | which involves the transfer of receivables to a trust and the issuance by the trust of beneficial interests to third-party investors |
| it could not be considered a dispute. I called multiple times and finally got transferred to a fraud specialist that filed the charges as fraud. | 1 | 0.0% | I contacted Chase Credit Card services to report fraud on my account. One call after another |
| it could not be pursued as a dispute. '' I was left with a false charge on my account. | 1 | 0.0% | stating that the fraud dispute was denied. Upon contacting the Wells Fargo claims center |
| it could not be re-opened and I could not open a new complaint,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,CA,90403,,Consent provided,Web,2017-12-08,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,2750009 | 1 | 0.0% | I placed multiple calls to Wells Fargo to get some answers. During one call |
| it could not be reversed and that I should have called in if I encountered issues with the email link. Frustrated | 1 | 0.0% | but the same error occurred each time. Assuming the email was sent in error |
| it could not have been me who used a XXXX card on these dates. | 1 | 0.0% | the last time it XXXX have been in my possession was XX/XX/XXXX. At that time |
| it could take up to 90 days to review and reach a conclusion. This is an unacceptable amount of time | 3 | 0.0% | as the collection agency already did an investigation in response to my dispute and promptly removed their false collection records from my credit reports. But XXXX XXXX is still not able to remove their false information in a timely manner. I was given conflicting directions - one representative told me to file a dispute directly with the credit bureaus |
| it could takes months and now the burden falls upon me. A full time teacher | 3 | 0.0% | XXXX changed its company name |
| it could takes months and now the burden falls upon meXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX changed its company name |
| it creates the risk of misidentification and potential fraud | 1 | 0.0% | the address XXXX XXXX XXXX |
| it creditor | 2 | 0.0% | and this serves as your official notice. This constitutes aggravated identity theft under 18 u.s.c 1028A by furnishing a consumer report without my written permission |
| it declined. I called customer service | 1 | 0.0% | so as to let the system cool off/get used to my account |
| it deducts the amount you have used and an extra XXXX dollars. I used this service for quite some time until issues occurred and hardship | 1 | 0.0% | I would get my pay |
| it defines electronic transfers ( including XXXX XXXX made through fraud as unauthorized. Even if the consumer is deceived into making the transfer | 1 | 0.0% | banks are obligated to investigate claims of fraudulent electronic fund transfers and provide remedies. Additionally |
| it definitely isnt a good customer experience. It makes people question Regions ability to handle their business,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION,AL,35173,,Consent provided,Web,2023-04-29,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6906601 | 1 | 0.0% | they would realize that the date being changed from XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX ( initialed or not ) has no impact on a check that isnt deposited until XX/XX/XXXX. Any check that isnt stale dated or post dated should be fine if the date of deposit is after the date on the check. If the check in question is only {$220.00} |
| it deletes it all | 1 | 0.0% | dropped |
| it did appear that these payments were routinely not posted until the next statement date. If this is a correct and normal accounting practice | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX XXXX stated to me that USAA has never reported a 30 day late to my Credit Bureaus |
| it did get resolved when I deleted and re-entered the information and you can see that I went back to having on-time payments. | 1 | 0.0% | and asked them to change how it was being reported because I have now sold that home that I was paying on |
| it did include all of those elements- and not only that | 1 | 0.0% | I still had not received a card. I called Capital One customer service |
| it did n't appear in my bank statement until XXXX XXXX so I was not able to notify Wells Fargo in a timely manner due to their own system delaying me by over a week. | 1 | 0.0% | I received a letter from Wells Fargo saying they decided that the {$410.00} charge was NOT fraudulent |
| it did not allow me to log in using those identity codes to the true CashApp support during the fraudulent call. Consequently | 1 | 0.0% | or algorithms did not work on that day ; the app did not request any predicate information ( name |
| it did not come back to a company | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX XXXX |
| it did not conform to the requirements of section 605B. Experian has since been given multiple opportunities to address its mishandling of my requests | 1 | 0.0% | the first time Experian received notice from me |
| it did not conform to the requirements of section XXXX. Experian has since been given multiple opportunities to address its mishandling of my requests | 1 | 0.0% | the first time Experian received notice from me |
| it did not cross my mind that this would be an issue. | 2 | 0.0% | it was made clear that my husband |
| it did not happen. In addition | 1 | 0.0% | immortal |
| it did not include the sum of all charges ; Insurance ; ( 5 ) Premium or other charge for any guarantee or insurance protecting the creditor against the obligors default or other credit loss. I | 1 | 0.0% | pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1635 ( a ) ( b ) ( f ). Coupled with this cover letter is the |
| it did not match... | 1 | 0.0% | and I've been trying nearly daily to speak with someone licensed. Additionally I have been trying to transfer my assets out of robinhood for literally MONTHS but the transfer fails because robinhood fabricated documentation so the plaid integration does not function which is how acat transfers are processed to XXXX. Again |
| it did not notify me until XXXX?? | 1 | 0.0% | I wasnt even in their system. The woman I spoke with said she needed my name ss # etc just for verification and I didnt pop up. She told me she would escalate my request to have this corrected as I wasnt even on of aware of the account. She didnt. When I called back to speak to a supervisor |
| it did not specify the consequences of not disputing the debt within this period | 1 | 0.0% | at XX/XX/XXXX I received a call from SIMM Associates. During this call |
| it did not state that I needed to take any action to switch to the standard repayment plan. | 1 | 0.0% | I received a letter from MOHELA |
| it did not yield any valid violation. The letter states that the trip date was XX/XX/XXXX. | 1 | 0.0% | I promptly attempted to raise my concerns with Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson |
| it did respond to the remaining complaints with substantive responses. | 3 | 0.0% | XXXX XXXX and XXXX wants to keep doing business with me |
| it did show I made a payment but instead of the principal amount owed on the loan lowering XXXX it added XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | I am very confused and pretty upset. This is my wifes car |
