2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 23.8K–23.9K of 25.6K

Company Complaints
is misleading. Additionally 3
is misrepresenting itself as a check verifier and check casher because the application is designed to make a guess '' or prediction '' based on the algorithms ability to determine whether the funds will clear on any check presented to the application. 1
is missing from the list displayed dropdown menu within my online Experian credit file account which is particularly notable. However 1
is my abuser. My abusive father now knows about my debt. ( 4 ) I have mental issues including XXXX 1
is my abuser. My abusive father now knows about my debt. ( XXXX ) I have mental issues including XXXX 1
is my ID # associated with this issue 1
is neither on the deed nor the mortgage. This property has always been my sole responsibility. Our divorce was finalized XX/XX/XXXX 1
is never available. I even called once to make a huge payment and it was denied. Yesterday I got a letter telling me to pay {$1000.00} and I was being `turned over to collections. 1
is no longer able to get the lost money back because it has been over 90 days. I am escalating Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and public for help. 1
is no longer in business and is no longer associated with Ygrene. Moreover 1
is no longer needed and not being utilized. USAA not only did not refund any portion of my XXXX auto insurance payment 1
is NON-JUDICIAL 1
is not 1
is not a consumer report. However 1
is not a legitimate source for credit reporting purposes. 3
is not a member of choice hotels 1
is not a reinvestigationit is procedural negligence. 1
is not a violation of terms whatsoever 1
is not acceptable and violates the FCRA. 1
is not acceptable.,,CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,IL,60089,,Consent provided,Web,2022-03-23,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,5360172 1
is not accidental 1
is not achieved within FOUR ( 4 ) BUSINESS DAYS from receipt of this correspondence. This matter pertains to the blatant mishandling and willful negligence of my client 's credit report 1
is not an appropriate resolution. I am a victim of fraudulent practices by XXXX College/XXXX UniversityXXXX Lending and now University Accounting Services ( UAS ) LLC 1
is not an auction. I believe Citi is being disingenuous in their interpretation of their 'auction site ' exclusion to avoid having to pay out on these Price Rewind claims.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CITIBANK 1
is not authorized by the court. 1
is not authorized. Here is the list of inquiries that are still reporting on my Credit Reports : XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX ; XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX ; XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX ; XXXX - AUTO FINANCE Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX ; XXXX 1
is not authorized. The following accounts listed below are still reporting on my Credit Reports and need to delete immediately : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX,,EQUIFAX 1
is not authorized. The following inquiries and accounts listed below are still reporting on my Credit Reports and need to delete immediately : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,AR,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2022-05-13,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5557414 1
is not easy either. Indeed 1
is not fraudulent or a major RED FLAG - and why didn't anyone ask me if I was being told to do the wires 1
is not how POA law works and has never been requested of me by any other financial institution in my time serving as POA.,,GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA,TX,752XX,,Consent provided,Web,2023-09-27,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,7611645 1
is not in accordance with the requirement set forth Pursuant to 606 of the FCRA 24
is not in accordance with the requirement set forth Pursuant to 60XXXX of the FCRA 1
is not in accordance with the requirement set forth Pursuant to XXXX of the FCRA 2
is not in compliance with the FCRA. 2
is not in my best interest. ME WAITING MORE TIME WHILE YOUR ON XXXX VACATION IS NOT IN MY BEST INTEREST!!! YOU TAKING KNOWN INFORMATION< ABD PRETENDING TO DO AN INVESTIGATION< EXTENDING IT ANOTHER 4 WEEKS IS NOT IN MY BEST INTEREST. YOU ONLY OFFERING THE MONEY YOU HAVE TAKEN 1
is not in the lease. 1
is not just inaccurateit is unlawful. 1
is not mentioned. This date is crucial to customers because once it has passed 1
is not mine. The XXXX account ending in XXXX 1
is not on me. I was also informed that the remaining balance would come out of my escrow balance. We submitted for the total of my payoff. The check was written for the amount we were told. Its very wild to me that its being insinuated that we were about to guess the amount of my payoff and be within {$400.00}. 1
is not only a glaring oversight but a direct contravention of the FCRA. 1
is not only insufficient but also demonstrates their belief that they are above accountability and can disregard borrowers rights. 1
is not only selling my nonpublic information to third parties without my consent but also engaging in the continuous securitization of my nonpublic personal information for profit. This egregious conduct must cease immediately. The prospectus of TransUnion underscores XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX role as the designated trustee for TRANSUNION LLC and TRANSUNION XXXX XXXX. However 1
is not only selling my nonpublic information to third parties without my consent but also engaging in the continuous securitization of my nonpublic personal information for profit. This egregious conduct must cease immediately. Their actions have left me feeling vulnerable and violated. The three inquiries and the accounts mentioned above constitute a violation of section 604 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 USC 1681b ) 1
is not only selling my nonpublic information to third parties without my consent but also engaging in the continuous securitization of my nonpublic personal information for profit. This egregious conduct must cease immediately. Their actions have left me feeling vulnerable and violated. The XXXX inquiries and the accounts mentioned above constitute a violation of section 604 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 USC 1681b ) 1
is not only that 1
is not reachable 1
is not reasonable under the circumstances nor is it the second business day. 1
is not responsible under the Uniform Commercial Code ( UCC ) and that the burden of ensuring proper endorsements falls on the bank of first deposit XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related