2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 21.6K–21.6K of 25.6K

Company Complaints
including all closed accounts and hard inquiries 3
including all consumer reports 1
including all debits 1
including all documentation establishing a complete chain of title from the original creditor to Midland Credit Management 1
including all late fees 1
including all names and addresses other than XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
including all parties that have accessed it. Please provide complete documentation identifying the requesting party and the purpose of the inquiry. If no permissible purpose exists 1
including all payments and interest calculations. 1
including all reporting to consumer reporting agencies. Promptly request deletion of any and all prior reporting made to any consumer reporting agencies. If you comply with my deletion request within 14 days 1
including all territories in the north from XXXX XXXX XXXX to XXXX XXXX as only landmass territorial borders land AND what! XXXX XXXX 1
including all the information required by 15 U.S. Code 1637 ( b ) 9
including allegations of sham dispute processes. Under 15 U.S.C. 16811 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) 1
including alleged default insurance payments 1
including alleged E*TRADE Bank 1
including amounts exceeding my verified monthly income. 1
including an alleged debt without verification. This inaccurate charge-off has caused me to be denied credit and face higher interest rates on auto and personal loans. Experians failure to remove or verify the legitimacy of this debt is grossly negligent and unjust. 1
including an auto loan and mortgage. 1
including an auto loan that was paid off. Not a single late payment. Why on God 's green earth would I pay those and not the pay day loan? It is so very clear that I was unaware of how this loan was reported. As a home owner 2
including an excutive manager who identified himself as XXXX. 1
including an Identity Theft Affidavit 2
including an identity theft affidavit and a police report substantiating my claim. She warned me that claims are sometimes automatically denied without proper review 1
including an immediate review of the circumstances surrounding this charge/item. 3
including an incorrect gender reference. Such inaccuracies further complicate this matter and cast doubt on the legitimacy of the debt attributed to me. 1
including an itemization of all fees and charges you claim are currently due ; 3. An explanation of how the amount due of XXXX on the Monthly Billing Statement datedXX/XX/XXXX to present was calculated and an explanation of why this amount was increased to {$1500.00} fee in the most recent Statement and foreclosure notice dated XX/XX/XXXX 4. The payment dates 1
including an itemized accounting of the amounts allegedly owed. The failure to provide this verification raises doubts about the legal enforceability of the alleged debt. 1
including an official enrollment verification letter dated XX/XX/XXXX 3
including another car dealer 's commission 1
including another copy of my driver 's license and the USPS address change letter 12 ) A copy of the successful fax transmission reports for XXXX & XX/XX/XXXX 1
including any archived or overwritten data Preservation of these records is critical to understanding how unauthorized access persisted and how recovery controls failed. 1
including any attachments 1
including any attempts to contact me by mail 12
including any changes in the applicable interest rates without a co-borrower ; ( E ) potential finance charges 1
including any charges added for collection activity. 15
including any charges added for collection activity. You have thirty (30) days from receipt of this notice to respond. Your failure to respond 2
including any charges added for collection activity.,,ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC.,MA,02302,,Consent provided,Web,2018-11-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3070121 1
including any charges added for collection activity.,,Peter Roberts & Associates 1
including any charges added for collection activity.,,Portfolio Recovery Associates 2
including any charges added for collection activity.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CITIBANK 2
including any charges added for collection activity.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Convergent Resources 1
including any charges added for collection activity.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,NRA Group 1
including any computations or itemization. 1
including any contact information of the furnisher of the disputed information and the method used during the investigation. 3. Section 611 ( b ) - Reinvestigations CRAs are mandated to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation of disputed information. I am formally requesting the details of this reinvestigation process 1
including any content in this communication is confidential 1
including any corrections made 1
including any crime listed as specified unlawful activity under this section or any felony violation of chapter 560 1
including any documentation described in clauses ( i ) and ( ii ) ; and ( B ) as proof of a claim of identity theft 10
including any documentation described in clauses ( XXXX ) and ( ii ) ; and ( B ) as proof of a claim of identity theft 4
including any documentation proving that I consented to each of the inquiries. 3
including any documents you have sent us as part of your dispute. 2. Investigate your dispute and verify whether information they report is accurate. 3. Provide us a response to your dispute and update any other information. 4. Update their records and systems 1
including any early lease payout options. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related