2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 27.9K–27.9K of 29.6K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
as Successor Trustee to XXXX 1
as successor trustee to XXXX 1
as such 6
as such powers of attorney pertains to me or any property owned by me 3
as such recorded a mortgage assignment on XX/XX/XXXX and have attempted to file this similar information with other government agencies local and such the like. Through this entire process you have unlawfully refused to verify and provide proof of wet signatures 1
as such relationship does not legally and lawfully exist. Even if it did 2
as summarized above. In connection with my complaint to the USDOE ombudsman 3
as supported by 15 USC 6801 5
as supported by 15 USC 6801. 3
as supported by Chaudhry v. Gallerizzo 2
as supported by Cushman v. Trans Union ( 115 F.3d 220 ) and Clark v. Capital Credit ( 460 F.3d 1162 ). 1
as supported by the documentation and exhibits I have provided ( XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ). According to Affirms policy 1
AS T HAS A PENDING '' STATUS 1
as TD Bank claimed. I have no records of signing or agreeing to this XXXX term 1
as that hadn't happened with previous banks. ( or the previous time with Synchrony ). They also notified me that the application for credit that was recently placed in a jewelry store in XXXX. When I called the retailers ( the jewelry store ) to get more information ( it didn't look like a real business ) 1
as that is also predatory. 1
as that status implies ongoing delinquency 3
as that term is defined in the Furnisher Rule at 16 C.F.R. 660.2 ( b ) 1
as that was as far back as XXXX would allow me to go using their online services. However the evidence I submitted was sufficient considering my dispute does n't claim inaccurate reporting until XX/XX/XXXX. My credit file should not reflect any late payments from Wells Fargo Dealer Services. I do not have any accounts in collections and do n't have any accounts to reflect late payments with the exception of Wells Fargo Dealer Services. I attempted to resolve this issue directly with Wells Fargo Dealer Services 1
as that was the biggest issue to accessing my account. I attached 6 different types of verifications of my current address in an online dispute. I waited the required time 1
as that was the deadline I had to cancel the card and not be charged for the annual fee. So this difference of ONE DAY 1
as that was the original payment method and the only channel for the refund. Additionally 1
as that was what was accurate and last reported. I also questioned why only some accounts were affected 1
as that would be day XXXX. 1
as the 'Noteholder ' of the debt. 1
as the account closure request was still processing. In the late afternoon 1
as the account is no longer open 1
as the account is no longer with XXXX. It did not even come to Convergent from XXXX. It came from XXXX. I told her that I was thoroughly disappointed in both XXXX and Convergent. Albeit 1
as the account is no longer with XXXX. It did not even come to XXXX from XXXX. It came from XXXX. I told her that I was thoroughly disappointed in both XXXX and XXXX. XXXX 1
as the account was closed and charged off by the original creditor ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Furthermore 1
AS THE ACCOUNT WAS PAID XX/XX/XXXX. 1
as the adjudication process ends once a ticket is paid even if it going through the adjudication process. As the legal owner of the vehicle 1
as the affected party and authorized representative of the name associated with the account. This filing is made with full reservation of rights under UCC 1-308 and protected freedom of expression under the First Amendment.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Credit Control 1
as the agency must provide complete and accurate information within my file. 3
as the agent would continue speaking over me when I would loudly and repeatedly asking for clarification ; B ) being put on hold for a lengthy period after which the call dropped and went to busy tone. 1
as the allegations against me are not true. I am deeply disappointed to have to dispute these claims 1
as the allegations are not true or I'll delete them immediately if that is indeed the case. 1
as the alleged debts were removed following my request for validation. However 1
as the amount being demanded does not reflect the legitimate charges 1
as the answers/responses provided by the HSBC associates are inconsistent and even contradictory. 1
as the asstes listed were simply a lot of debt with heavy monthly payments. In XXXX and/or XXXX 1
as the attorney was not retained in reference to the judgment 1
as the balance is inaccurate and misleading.,,LOBEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION,NV,89119,,Consent provided,Web,2024-12-08,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,11071096 1
as the balance is past due as of XX/XX/XXXX '' and the balance was updated on XX/XX/XXXX ''. Payment History ( XXXX ) Inconsistent reporting of CO ( Charge Off ) and ND ( No Data for this period ) The history shows CO for XXXX XXXX 1
as the bank has already confirmed 1
as the bank is prohibiting me from closing an account 1
as the bank should know whether a refund is related to the transaction or not 1
as the bank was unable to explain any further detail. I spoke with FN in XXXX ( XXXX XXXX and XXXX ). Their intial response was that they had no answer and did not confirm any help in this matter.The mortgage paper payment coupon stated in needed payment in a 30 day period. ( XXXX ). I then proceeded to call XXXX XXXX every other day to but to no avail and no response 1
as the beneficiary in this relationship 1
as the benefits of the subscription were never consumed. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →