2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 27.3K–27.3K of 29.6K

Company Complaints
as it was allegedly verified at the source. It clearly does not match. If any investigation was actually performed each time 3
as it was almost 8 years from the time that the supposed final payment was missed. The agent told me I should still pay regardless of any statutes '' because otherwise I would accrue fees and additional interest on my account with IQ Data International 1
as it was also my choice to participate in accepting the credit card. This action is going to hurt my credit score and prevent further use of my credit rating to aquire future credit. Changing my credit card limit without any notification to automatically max out my credit card when I specifically chose to keep it at 44 % usage is not legal.,,DISCOVER BANK,TX,768XX,,Consent provided,Web,2023-09-09,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,7523075 1
as it was an awkward 1
as it was calculated from the send date and included in the fixed monthly payments due starting XX/XX/XXXX. 1
as it was clear and evident that the services had not been received. Documentation of these facts may be found by referencing the following Capital One case number : XXXX number : XXXX. 1
as it was considered standard procedure. 1
as it was established I had sent money to the scammer 1
as it was forced on me. 1
as it was furnished without my explicit consent. The failure to obtain proper consent undermines the statutory protections designed to ensure that consumer information is handled with the consumer 's knowledge and approval. 3
as it was my first time hearing of it. I scrambled on a Friday afternoon obtaining three different quotes and realizing I needed my appraisal to generate the quote ; which I had to go back to my lender to get. Monday. And quickly and my lender contacted me for the insurance selection. I provided her the with my selection and she then informed me that the fha guidelines required a limitation on the fees which I wasnt aware of. Therefore ; I was obligated to proceed with their insurance provider. 1
as it was my first time that they would take care of it. Nonetheless 1
as it was my intention when I tried to pay my bill. 1
as it was my only option. I then noticed in the Dispute Center of Experian over ten names on my account that were not mine. Addresses in Arizona 1
as it was my only option. I then noticed in the Dispute Center of XXXX over ten names on my account that were not mine. Addresses in Arizona 1
as it was my purchase. However 1
as it was some time ago. 1
as it was stated for closure 1
as it was still within the time frame to do so. On XX/XX/year> 1
as it was thefault of BofA that a check was sent and subsequently cashed by a party which was not entitled to any payment from me. Bank Of America wants to treat this as a fraud case in which XXXX will have to prove that it did not receive or cash the check. This will be a prolonged process that is unnecessary as the cancelled check 1
as it was unethical and illegal 1
as it would clearly show the criminal comminting fraud was not me 1
as it would cover a full 5 years of ownership. 1
as it's been seven months of my trying and with no visible signs the bank is willing to concede to it.,,PNC Bank N.A.,,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2025-12-08,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,17826110 1
AS IT'S HIDDEN IN VERY SMALL TEXT. 1
as it's online access is no longer available. I have attached a copy of the check received. 1
as it's violation of privacy policy so it is impossible for me to do this. Chase Auto obviously made the error here of paying something they shouldn't 1
as it's yet another account that may be leaked via a data breach ( and RightPath experienced a data breach as recently as last fall ). 1
as its all falling apart right in front of the nations eyes with still no solution or recourse 4
as its continued reporting is unlawful and unfairly damages my credit profile. 3
as its inclusion is unlawful and causes harm to my credit standing. 1
as its presence would then violate the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) and misrepresent the nature of the account. 1
as landlords often rely on credit reports to verify residency history 1
as last I checked thru the credit agency 's this debt does not exist 1
as lawfully amended at [ 12 U.S.C. 3401 ] 1
as Legal Title Trustee '' ; c. '' Current Monthly Payment Amount : {$5300.00} '' ; d. '' Escrow Balance : {$1400.00} '' ; e. '' Current Unpaid Accrued Interest : {$0.00} '' ; and f. '' Late Charges : {$0.00}. '' [ ATTACHMENT 5 ] 22. Notwithstanding the confusion 1
as lenders may view my report as high-risk due to multiple hard pulls from the same source XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Inquiry I have no relationship with this bank and never authorized any inquiry. Under FCRA 616 and 617 1
as lenders rely on these reports to assess creditworthiness. 1
as lenders view multiple inquiries as a sign of financial distress or overextension 1
as letters from Pacific Union typically arrive XXXX days after they are dated. The reason for the denial was listed as insufficient debt-to-income ratio. They denied our application 1
as listed on the monthly statement. I would now actually have a higher credit balance than the month before. I have maintained a perfect payment history with this account 1
as litigation does not waive borrower protections. On XX/XX/year> 1
as Loan 3 had already been forgiven XXXX days earlier. Now 1
as local agencies pass victims like me endlessly to XXXX XXXX with XXXX accountability for grand larceny. 1
as long as a {$130.00} payment was made to the account. I specifically asked about the impact on my credit report 1
as long as I did not physically leave the hotel for the entire 10 nights 1
as long as I met various conditions 1
as long as Im meeting my contractual obligations 1
as long as someone continues to pay for the car. And if for any reason 1
as long as the borrowers payment is not more than 30 days overdue. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related