| and the account continues to be marked verified without explanation. | 2 | 0.0% | under 15 U.S.C. 1681i |
| and the account has been re-aged. It doesn't really matter what XXXX states if the other 2 conflict. And as for XXXX XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | instead TransUnion moved the XXXX deletion date from XXXX to XXXX Experian is still reporting XXXX and told me I need additional relevant information to support my claim for both accounts. I was not submitting a dispute |
| and the account has been updated on your credit report to reflect as Current | 1 | 0.0% | notably informing TransUnion that my account status was 30 days late |
| and the account having been closed ( or so I was assured ) | 1 | 0.0% | informed them that it appeared my card had been stolen |
| and the account in question should reflect a status of Paid As Agreed | 4 | 0.0% | it constitutes an error that should be rectified immediately. Obligations of Information Furnishers - 15 U.S. Code 1681s-2 Creditors and furnishers must ensure that the information reported to credit bureaus is accurate. If the creditor can not substantiate the late payment with verifiable documentation |
| and the account is closed so I am unable to log in to see what is the hold up. I have worked so hard to raise my credit score over the years | 1 | 0.0% | I have not been been able to log into my account via mobile or desktop to pay my bills. Finally I was able to just pay the balances through the phone which inconveniences me because I have to wait on the line. Moving forward to XXXX when I finally had access to log into my account I would be denied of adding external checking accounts and errors would appear on the desktop version ( mobile does not permit adding external accounts ). It was implied it would be easier if I would just create a checking account with them |
| and the account is completely unverifiable. Discover has failed to provide any substantiating proof that I am legally obligated to this debt | 1 | 0.0% | even with that notation |
| and The account is/was in good standing aside from the previously disputed charges. | 1 | 0.0% | I am now seeking re-insertion of the tradeline with the correct information. In order to facilitate this process with the credit reporting agencies ( Experian |
| and the account was mishandled.exhibit C-verified XXXX claim- ongoing medical hardship during Navy Federal account handling I was out of work and on verified XXXX XXXX starting in XX/XX/XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | with a XXXX call to Navy Federal and spoke with XXXX ( ID # XXXX ). I asked for documentation on the account closure |
| and the account was not opened. A couple of hours later I reached out to their customer service department via phone to the request the account be opened and money transferred | 1 | 0.0% | I contacted the customer service department to figure out what was wrong. While I was on the phone with the customer service representative |
| and the account was placed under a temporary relief agreement. | 3 | 0.0% | Relief |
| and the account with preferred credit is closed. They in fact never loaned me anything and XXXX had returned the advanced funds for the Vac Loan to Preferred Credit. | 1 | 0.0% | that Preferred Credit had finished processing the return |
| And The Accounts In Question Should Reflect A Status Of Paid As Agreed | 9 | 0.0% | Specifically Concerning The Accounts Referenced With XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Upon Thorough Review |
| and the accounts must be removed. Requested Action : - Conduct a complete investigation into the listed accounts - Provide all supporting documentation of their legitimacy and permissible purpose - Permanently delete any account that can not be verified or validated - Provide written confirmation of the results of your investigation Please complete this investigation and respond within 30 days as required by federal law. If these accounts are not removed or validated properly | 1 | 0.0% | deletion |
| and the accounts SHALL be deleted. This account is not related to any transaction authorized by me | 1 | 0.0% | Date Opened : XX/XX/year> |
| and the accounts were closed. All | 1 | 0.0% | in fact |
| and the accounts were created without my knowledge or consent. | 3 | 0.0% | neither of which I opened or authorized XXXX XXXX XXXX Multiple entries |
| and the accuracy of credit assessments is maintained. Therefore | 2 | 0.0% | and any violation will be subject to legal recourse. Under 15 USC 1666b |
| and the actual copy attached to the disputes. | 1 | 0.0% | making these accounts long past the statute of limitations prescribed under Mississippi statute and as such legally extinguished under the operation of law via Mississippi Code Annotated 15-1-3. This fact has been provided to Equifax via a dispute notice a minimum of ten times over the period of the last two to three years |
| and The actual documentation relied upon. | 2 | 0.0% | TransUnion is required to disclose the method of verification |
| and the additional interest ( 39.9 % ) had been added to the balance. I offered to pay the previous balance in full to close out the account ( XXXX ) and was told that was not an option. | 1 | 0.0% | nor was I aware of any promotion. Just that my charges for the dental work were taken care of. My original limit was {$4000.00} |
| and the address. Is the police officer misapplying the law in my case harming me in the process. The police report is in New Hampshire. | 1 | 0.0% | the signature was verified with a DMV ID number ( an adult was required to show ID to enter into the rental contract. ) The ID was not photocopied nor was the name written down. But the Name of the person wearing the tuxedo |
| and the adequacy of policies and procedures and the control and supervision of the licensed mortgage loan servicing operations. The Multi-State Examination was conducted by the State Mortgage Regulators from the states of Arizona | 1 | 0.0% | on or about XX/XX/XXXX |
| and the administration of consumer laws and regulations. | 1 | 0.0% | more generally |
| and the adverse customer harm has now been in effect for 4 months | 1 | 0.0% | so in early XX/XX/XXXX |
| and the affected consumers relied on these misrepresentations to entrust the company with their sensitive data. | 1 | 0.0% | including privacy policies |
| and the affected fields were modified accordingly. | 1 | 0.0% | Equifax issued a dispute results letter to me regarding this account. That same day |
| and the affiliated talent agency had a website with a domain that matched the email address of the person who contacted me. | 1 | 0.0% | which had contacted me through XXXX to hire me for freelance photography work. ( As a freelance photographer |
| and the afternoon and evening I was in XXXX XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | I have provided information documenting that I was not in XXXX XXXX |
| and the agent confirmed receipt. Additionally | 1 | 0.0% | I received a letter from Freedom Mortgage |
| and the agent ended the call informing you that she would seek clarification on how your credit may be impacted and would call you back with an update. However | 3 | 0.0% | This letter is in response to your complaint to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau XXXX CFPB ) in which you express concerns regarding the information being furnished to the credit reporting agencies during your recently approved partial-pay forbearance plan. As a preliminary matter |
| and the agent I spoke to this time ( XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | the day it was due. and noticed that my account with Capital One had been restricted online and it said to call. I called immediately and they said my account had been flagged for bankruptcy! I have never filed bankruptcy in my life! I immediately asked to talk to a supervisor |
| and the agent informed me that my loan had been re-classified in error on or about XX/XX/XXXX. No notice was | 1 | 0.0% | we received a call from an Amerihome representative indicating that the paperwork |
| and the agent said that XXXX had no record of my loan. XXXX did not debit any additional payments from my checking account and I never heard from XXXX again. | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) called me to set up payments for these three student loans. XXXX negotiated a settlement with me |
| and the agents refused to transfer my call to a US agent or to notify a supervisor. I have no intention of divulging my Social Security number to an overseas call center agent on an unsecured phone line. | 1 | 0.0% | but was unable to get a live agent online. I was able to request a report |
| and the agony of having my nest-egg taken out of my control. I know the agreed interest was 2.65 % because that is what would yield me a monthly interest income of almost $ XXXX. I did not sign on for {$320.00} interest for 1.77 months of their having my month | 1 | 0.0% | plus {$400.00} accrued interest |
| and the agreed upon scope of work of the service. | 2 | 0.0% | are documented via several methods of correspondence. Email |
| and the agreement is a Cognitive Contract | 1 | 0.0% | notice to agent is notice to principal. '' On XXXX19 XXXX XXXX received the letter |
| and the agreement is a XXXX XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | notice to agent is notice to principal. '' On XXXX XXXX XXXX received the letter |
| and the airline has basically shut down. My friend on the same flight submitted a dispute to her credit card company about a week after me | 1 | 0.0% | and was informed it would take 45 days to process. They declined the dispute |
| and the airline refused any refund or partial refund. | 1 | 0.0% | airline representatives provided contradictory and inaccurate explanations |
| and the airlines own fare chart showing that the checked bag was included. Capital One closed the case stating I did not provide sufficient documentation | 1 | 0.0% | rather than the defective baggage service. I provided extensive documentation |
| and the Alexandrian conduct a comprehensive XXXX forensic audit of their point-of-sale terminal involved in processing my American Express XXXX Gift XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX to determine if there was/is any malicious malware that compromised my gift card and its data to facilitate the theft of funds. All requests were approved by XXXX XXXX XXXX General Manager | 1 | 0.0% | expiration date and security PIN and the ultimate theft of the {$950.00} balance that was used in the XX/XX/XXXX |
| and the alleged amount owed to that creditor at the time it was sold to you. When you identify the original creditor | 1 | 0.0% | LLC XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX |
| and the ambiguous tied up '' notation creates confusion about the actual status of this account. I request that the credit bureau reach out to the creditor to obtain a thorough explanation and any relevant documentation to verify whether this charge-off is justified. If there is no clear justification or documentation to substantiate the entry | 3 | 0.0% | the XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX account is also listed with a {$0.00} balance and the tied up '' designation |
| and the amortization is not the way it should be and my excess to principal monthly from my monthly payments since XXXX XXXX through XXXX XXXX has been calculated incorrectly. | 1 | 0.0% | XXXX did not calculate the the XXXX XXXX XXXX accurately. On my monthly statements |
| and the amount | 1 | 0.0% | including a breakdown showing the amount |
| and the amount did not reflect the monies we had paid while we were in forbearance ( a total of {$2700.00} ). She informed us that those monies were applied to escrow and that was a separate account so it did not reduce our payment of what is owed for the three months in forbearance. Keep in mind | 1 | 0.0% | Mr. XXXX asked again for specific documents in order to complete our packet. We quickly provided those documents along with follow-up letters to ensure completeness and we thought we were finally in the final stages of approval. XX/XX/XXXX we were given a new assigned point of contact Ms. XXXX and the process started yet again. She laid out a repayment plan and informed us for the first time that we were denied deferment or loan modification. To summarize |
| and the amount of debt owed. The debt can not be authenticated if there is no information in the bill of sale that identifies the person or company regarding the details of the debt. Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates | 1 | 0.0% | the best-evidence rule requires that where the contents of a writing are desired to be proved |
| and the amount of debt owed. The debt can not be authenticated if there is no information in the bill of sale that identifies the person or company regarding the details of the debt. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX | 1 | 0.0% | the best-evidence rule requires that where the contents of a writing are desired to be proved |