2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: A

Companies starting with A that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

29.6K companies starting with "A"

Showing 19.4K–19.4K of 29.6K

Company Complaints
and started the dispute process with cash app. I assumed it would be a very easy win since they know that I had been hacked because they're the one who just gave it back to me. ( But I had to start a new cash app account just to be able to file a claim and dispute what they took ) An since the account I started was only to access the chat support once they helped me regain access 1
and state as well providing documentation as to the HOA ). 1
and State Attorney General 4
and State Attorney General * *. 2
and State Attorney General Filing of a civil suit seeking damages under FCRA 1681n and 1681o Sincerely 1
and State Attorney General Request investigation into Provider Relief Fund misuse tied to aggressive medical debt collection Consider legal action for damages under the FCRA and FDCPA. 1
and State Attorney General. 1
and State Attorney General.,,EQUIFAX 2
and state Attorney General.,Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint,Eastern Account Systems of Connecticut 1
and State Attorney General.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,MI,48223,,Consent provided,Web,2025-08-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,15182147 1
and State Attorney General.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,MI,48235,,Consent provided,Web,2025-08-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,15187696 1
and State Attorney General.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 2
and state attorney generals. Mobiloans must be held accountable for these FCRA violations that are damaging my credit profile. I demand that this account be promptly deleted in its entirety.,,Mobiloans 1
and state attorney generals. Mobiloans must be held accountable for these FCRA violations that are damaging my credit profile. I demand that this account be promptly deleted in its entirety.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
and state authorities # # REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION I demand that TransUnion provide me with : XXXX. Complete documentation of your Metro 2 Format validation procedures 2. Evidence of any technical compliance checks performed on my file 3. Certification that the information in my file meets all CRRG technical requirements # # CONCLUSION The violations detailed above represent fundamental technical failures that can not be resolved through standard reinvestigation procedures. As established in XXXX XXXX Trans Union* 1
and state deceptive-practices laws. I am seeking correction of the contract so that it reflects the lawful advertised price and fully compliant disclosures.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,BANK OF AMERICA 1
and state district NO HELP! I 've even tried to speak with the Loan servicer of AES all they can state is you signed a promissory note 1
and state elder abuse statutes Refer this matter to the Office for XXXX XXXX and relevant enforcement teams Weve attached ( or submitted separately ) a full final legal demand letter outlining these violations in detail. We are small business owners and XXXX XXXX trying to recover from significant financial harm. Bank of Americas refusal to act in good faith must be reviewed. 1
and state law. 1
and state regulators. 1
and state repossession laws. The CFPB closed both of my previous complaints without properly reviewing these responses or the contradictions between them. I even submitted feedback explaining this 1
and State RISA and MVISA statutes : A deficiency can not be claimed unless all of the required notices were properly and timely given 1
and state that the debtor is entitled to an accounting of the unpaid indebtedness and the charge 1
and state XXXX 1
and state-specific laws. I seek restitution for the financial harm caused and enforcement of legal penalties against the responsible parties to prevent further abuse of the mortgage securitization process. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.,,Mr. Cooper Group Inc.,NY,10550,,Consent provided,Web,2024-07-28,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,9636016 1
and State/Federal Consumer Protection Laws Account # XXXX To Whom It May Concern : This letter constitutes a formal demand for immediate redress concerning egregious violations of state and federal law perpetrated by Santander Consumer USA Inc. ( Santander ) and XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ) ( collectively 1
and stated 1
and stated he made final decision already but couldnt tell me ''. I again begged to have input with the recordings 1
and stated he would look into the account further but took no action 1
and stated it was mislabeled and did not require XXXX and emailed I have cleared that department. Yet when in the complaint I asked if mislabeling was corrected : you can see it was never addressed 1
and stated it was paid in full. The letter also requested that I submit any insurance refund that I receive from my previous insurance to them.I asked the representative why I would submit funds that I already paid for in full to them 1
and stated it will remain on my credit report until XXXX. 1
and stated that 1
and stated that if you finance with us you get 50 % off 1
and stated that Capital One requires a manual verification. After hearing what had transpired 1
and stated that he would also contact the police in regards. His cell number ( XXXX ) XXXX I filed a police report # XXXX 1
and stated that I should get someone to read it to me. 1
and stated that I was delinquent in paying it. 1
and stated that I would be filing an online complaint to the CFPB 1
and stated that I would wait for the full XXXX points to be credited. The Barclay manager on XX/XX/2016 opened CASE XXXX to have my points account credited. 1
and stated that she reviewed the security tapes and that I was not in the bank. Help me understand 1
and stated that the provisional credit for {$2000.00} would be withdrawn if this information is not received by XX/XX/XXXX. 1
and stated that their tactics were indeed sketchy at best. 1
and stated that they need 3-7 business days to come up with security questions to ask me so I can verify myself. They did not provide a case number 1
and stated that they required a letter from Capital One confirming that the hard inquiry was fraudulent. 1
and stated that they required a letter from XXXX XXXX confirming that the hard inquiry was fraudulent. 1
and stated the situation. XXXX ( XXXX minute ) : I contacted the Wells Fargo XXXX in XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX. I provided the name of the teller who assisted me on XX/XX/XXXX 1
and stated they could not review order details until after 30 days from the purchase date. They requested an itemized receipt for further review after that 30 day period - meaning the appeal can not be made until after the return window has closed. 1
and statement of cash flows. 4
and states it was an error in their system upgrade. '' Bids goodbye and gives a promise it wo n't happen again. 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter A that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related