Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
{$17000.00}. 2
{$180.00} for cleaning charges 1
{$180.00} XXXX 1
{$1800.00} Inquiry : XXXX XXXX 1
{$1800.00} Still have an interest charge of {$190.00} this beyond ridiculous. 1
{$1800.00} XXXX. XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ) 1
{$1800.00},Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,IL,60609,,Consent provided,Web,2025-04-20,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,13083007 1
{$18000.00} had been fraudulently transferred to the savings account in XXXX separate transfers. 1
{$19.00} 1
{$190.00} 1
{$190.00} ) as well as XXXX withdrawals ( {$360.00} 1
{$1900.00} 1
{$1900.00} per month 1
{$19000.00} UNAUTHORIZEDCOLLECTIO 1
{$19000.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 1
{$20.00} 1
{$20.00} each 1
{$20.00} XXXX XXXX transactions of {$11.00} 1
{$200.00} 3
{$2000.00} 3
{$2000.00} perhaps 1
{$2000.00} XXXX on XX/XX/22 to XXXX {$2000.00} XX/XX/22 to XXXX {$500.00},Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CENTRAL BANCOMPANY 1
{$2000.00} XXXX XXXX Bank 3
{$20000.00} 1
{$20000.00}. 1
{$210.00} 2
{$210.00} Inquiries : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX Late Payments : XXXX XXXX 1
{$2100.00} 2
{$2100.00} '' and when I asked XXXX if that was the GAP insurance 1
{$2100.00} XXXX CARD 1
{$2100.00} XXXX XXXXXXXX 1
{$2100.00}. It should be noted that Nationstar has previously settled with the CFPB in a XXXX enforcement action for these very practices 1
{$210000.00}. It is a fact 1
{$220.00} all cashed same day. Now why would it be {$220.00} in the same number of the Account XXXX. My Opinion from my own instinct is the Fraudster ( possibly be an inside Embezzler ) who witnessed the balance which was the same amount on the Estate Account since last XX/XX/year> Statement. ( {$100000.00} ). It was a dormant account because of non-activity by me. The only person that has access to the XXXX Account. 1
{$2200.00} 1
{$2200.00} to principal ( XXXX ) 1
{$2200.00}. I said that was not enough because I didnt feel like I even owed them the money. I countered with a lower number {$1200.00} 1
{$23.00} They still owe me a credit for the {$1000.00} chargeback that was charged to my balance on XX/XX/XXXX. When you net this against the 4 random credits they have given me that have no offsetting charge ( totaling {$50.00} ) and combine that with 4 months of interest charges charged to me for short paying these fraudulent charges 1
{$230.00} 1
{$230.00} for XXXX payments and {$230.00} for XXXX payment. I called Enerbank and advised them that I had only borrowed {$11000.00} and that the AMOUNT FINANCED should reflect the actual actual amount and not an estimate since we all knew that amount that I needed to get the fence. No one would listen to me when I kept calling customer service requesting an updated and correct truth in lending disclosure statement. I was advised to review my billing statement for this information. Please also note in attached document 1
{$230.00} These accounts have been erroneously marked 1
{$230.00} XXXX 1
{$230.00}. 1
{$2300.00} 2
{$2300.00} principal only payment and applied it to the XXXX payment and took the interest 1
{$2300.00} These accounts were not authorized by me and have no legitimate connection to my financial activity. In fact 2
{$24.00} on XXXX 1
{$24.00} or {$36.00} 1
{$240.00} 3
{$2400.00} 3

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.