Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Bank ) XX/XX/year> 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( D.Conn. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( debt collector ). Nor have I ever done any form of business with them. Now if your company would have done a legitimate re-investigation you would have concluded that 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Equifax ) XX/XX/XXXX : XXXX XXXX ( TransUnion ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX # XXXX ( Equifax ) XX/XX/XXXX : XXXX ( TransUnion ) XX/XX/XXXX : XXXX XXXX ( TransUnion ) 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( HARD INQUIRY ) 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( ID : XXXX ) 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Miscellaneous ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Miscellaneous ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ( Retailer ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Hotel and travel ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ( Bank ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Auto ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Miscellaneous ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Miscellaneous ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Retailer ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX & # XXXX ; XXXX XXXX ( Hotel and travel ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ( Bank ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Auto ) XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXXA ( Finance ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( mo ) XXXX XXXX XXXX. I presume that no proof of the alleged debt 4
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Name ID # XXXX ) 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Neb. XXXX XXXX. XXXX ) where LVNV was challenged over chain of title and proof of ownership of debt. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Opened : XX/XX/XXXX ) 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( ORIG CREDITOR : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXXBalance : {$690.00} 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$1000.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$2000.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$2000.00},,EQUIFAX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$2000.00}XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance : {$1200.00},,EQUIFAX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$470.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$760.00} 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$120.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$120.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$470.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$120.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance Owed : {$1100.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$690.00} XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$0.00} US DEPT ED XXXX Balance Owed : {$2000.00} US DEPT ED XXXX Balance Owed : {$4700.00} XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$710.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$480.00} XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX ) XXXX Balance Owed : {$640.00} XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance Owed : {$3000.00} XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance Owed : {$1000.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,TX,76013,,Consent provided,Web,2023-12-04,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,7940757 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance XXXX {$1800.00} XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$1400.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$1700.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$1000.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$1700.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$1000.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( phone ( XXXX ) XXXX ext. XXXX ) who informed me that LoanDepot would not take 3-5 business days to review '' my request. This is an unfair and deceptive business practice and constitutes theft. LoanDepot had no basis to make a withdrawal against my checking account and by doing so has stolen from me.,,LD Holdings Group 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Transunion : XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/2022 ),Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 4
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX Experian ) 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX '' ) met its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA '' ) when it relied solely on the creditors ' original information in determining the accuracy of a consumer 's credit information. The court held that the FCRA requires a credit reporting agency to go beyond its original sources of credit information when reinvestigating inaccuracies in a credit report after the consumer informs the agency of those inaccuracies. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) 5
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) ). 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) ). accept as true all well-pled factual allegations in this complaint and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from them. ' '' Estate of XXXX by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) : Emphasizes the importance of accuracy and completeness in consumer reporting and the need for thorough investigation and validation when a consumer disputes information. XXXX v. XXXX Bank of Massachusetts 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) : Emphasizes the importance of accuracy and completeness in consumer reporting and the need for thorough investigation and validation when a consumer disputes information. XXXX vXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX. XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX. XXXX ) : Held that debt collectors must conduct meaningful investigations when disputes are raised 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) [ a burden shifting analysis first developed by the United States Supreme Court. ] The circumstances of this case are more obvious. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) Right to Rescind Without Justification Failing to issue a XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.