Total complaints
1
Filed since XXXX
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX '' ) met its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA '' ) when it relied solely on the creditors ' original information in determining the accuracy of a consumer 's credit information. The court held that the FCRA requires a credit reporting agency to go beyond its original sources of credit information when reinvestigating inaccuracies in a credit report after the consumer informs the agency of those inaccuracies.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since XXXX. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since XXXX
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX '' ) met its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA '' ) when it relied solely on the creditors ' original information in determining the accuracy of a consumer 's credit information. The court held that the FCRA requires a credit reporting agency to go beyond its original sources of credit information when reinvestigating inaccuracies in a credit report after the consumer informs the agency of those inaccuracies.'s 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| SO SHE TRANSFERED ME TO XXXX -- iID NUMBER XXXX SHE WAS RUDE AND BASICALLY TOLD ME SHE COULD NOT FIND ANYWHERE THAT I EVEN DISPUTED ONCE THIS YEAR?????? XXXX MY SURPRISE WHEN SHE ASKED ME TO XXXX XXXX ANOTHER SET OF INVESTIGATIONS? I SAID NO THERE ARE SOME ALREADY IN PLACE AND TOLD HER THE SAME THING I SAID TO XXXX. AND SHE SAID DOESNT MATTER SHE DOES NOT SEE ANY OTHER DISPUTES. I SAID OK NOT GON NA DO THIS FILE WHATEVER YOU WANT I AM FILING A LAWSUIT BECAUSE CLEARLY MY RIGHTS AS A CONSUMER ARE BEING VIOLATED AND I HAVE PROVIDED PROOF ALONG WITH CONTACTING CREDITORS | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| THE LAW STATES THAT I DO NOT HAVE TO ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING : In XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX '' ) met its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA '' ) when it relied solely on the creditors ' original information in determining the accuracy of a consumer 's credit information. The court held that the FCRA requires a credit reporting agency to go beyond its original sources of credit information when reinvestigating inaccuracies in a credit report after the consumer informs the agency of those inaccuracies. has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XXXX, and the most recent logged activity is XXXX AGAIN, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX '' ) met its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA '' ) when it relied solely on the creditors ' original information in determining the accuracy of a consumer 's credit information. The court held that the FCRA requires a credit reporting agency to go beyond its original sources of credit information when reinvestigating inaccuracies in a credit report after the consumer informs the agency of those inaccuracies. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "SO SHE TRANSFERED ME TO XXXX -- iID NUMBER XXXX SHE WAS RUDE AND BASICALLY TOLD ME SHE COULD NOT FIND ANYWHERE THAT I EVEN DISPUTED ONCE THIS YEAR?????? XXXX MY SURPRISE WHEN SHE ASKED ME TO XXXX XXXX ANOTHER SET OF INVESTIGATIONS? I SAID NO THERE ARE SOME ALREADY IN PLACE AND TOLD HER THE SAME THING I SAID TO XXXX. AND SHE SAID DOESNT MATTER SHE DOES NOT SEE ANY OTHER DISPUTES. I SAID OK NOT GON NA DO THIS FILE WHATEVER YOU WANT I AM FILING A LAWSUIT BECAUSE CLEARLY MY RIGHTS AS A CONSUMER ARE BEING VIOLATED AND I HAVE PROVIDED PROOF ALONG WITH CONTACTING CREDITORS", and the single most common underlying issue is "THE LAW STATES THAT I DO NOT HAVE TO ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING : In XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX '' ) met its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA '' ) when it relied solely on the creditors ' original information in determining the accuracy of a consumer 's credit information. The court held that the FCRA requires a credit reporting agency to go beyond its original sources of credit information when reinvestigating inaccuracies in a credit report after the consumer informs the agency of those inaccuracies.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX '' ) met its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA '' ) when it relied solely on the creditors ' original information in determining the accuracy of a consumer 's credit information. The court held that the FCRA requires a credit reporting agency to go beyond its original sources of credit information when reinvestigating inaccuracies in a credit report after the consumer informs the agency of those inaccuracies. has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX '' ) met its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA '' ) when it relied solely on the creditors ' original information in determining the accuracy of a consumer 's credit information. The court held that the FCRA requires a credit reporting agency to go beyond its original sources of credit information when reinvestigating inaccuracies in a credit report after the consumer informs the agency of those inaccuracies. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX '' ) met its obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA '' ) when it relied solely on the creditors ' original information in determining the accuracy of a consumer 's credit information. The court held that the FCRA requires a credit reporting agency to go beyond its original sources of credit information when reinvestigating inaccuracies in a credit report after the consumer informs the agency of those inaccuracies. is "THE LAW STATES THAT I DO NOT HAVE TO ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING : In XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX" in the "SO SHE TRANSFERED ME TO XXXX -- iID NUMBER XXXX SHE WAS RUDE AND BASICALLY TOLD ME SHE COULD NOT FIND ANYWHERE THAT I EVEN DISPUTED ONCE THIS YEAR?????? XXXX MY SURPRISE WHEN SHE ASKED ME TO XXXX XXXX ANOTHER SET OF INVESTIGATIONS? I SAID NO THERE ARE SOME ALREADY IN PLACE AND TOLD HER THE SAME THING I SAID TO XXXX. AND SHE SAID DOESNT MATTER SHE DOES NOT SEE ANY OTHER DISPUTES. I SAID OK NOT GON NA DO THIS FILE WHATEVER YOU WANT I AM FILING A LAWSUIT BECAUSE CLEARLY MY RIGHTS AS A CONSUMER ARE BEING VIOLATED AND I HAVE PROVIDED PROOF ALONG WITH CONTACTING CREDITORS" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.