Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX I then asked them to provide proof that these were my accounts due to them not having removed them and they did not respond. Both failed responses exceeded the 60 day standard timeframe it takes for them to respond.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XXXX I WAS AFRAID THIS WOULD CANCEL MY NEW HOME DREAMS ...? SO EVEN THOU I DID NOT OWE THIS CELL PHONE BILL 1
XXXX I was told that they would be removed due the the GOV mandated of student loans.,,EQUIFAX 1
XXXX I was told that they would be removed due the the GOV mandated of student loans.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,OH,43229,,Consent provided,Web,2020-11-25,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3974054 1
XXXX I was told that they would be removed due the the GOV mandated of student loans.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XXXX ID card 1
XXXX if I did n't make my outstanding payment. It was their error and all they can say is oh sorry we made a mistake ''? 1
XXXX If you change your mind 1
XXXX ignores the limitation of liability contained in the Terms of Use. Leaving me 1
XXXX IL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX il XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX IL XXXX XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,AL,362XX,,Consent provided,Web,2024-11-25,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,10917855 1
XXXX illegal sales deed that needs to be quieted. 1
XXXX illegally again ( See XXXX XXXX illegal charges from XXXX 1
XXXX illegally refused to provide me a copy of this purported response from XXXX. I demanded a copy 1
XXXX Illinois. I then ended the call. 1
XXXX implemented laws 1
XXXX in addition to this complaint.,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING 1
XXXX in an emergency 1
XXXX in book sales ). The Payment Agreement also included a 100 % Satisfaction Guarantee and 100 % Money Back Guarantee. The charge on my credit card was made by an entity calling itself XXXX XXXX. Attachment A is a copy of the Payment Agreement which includes a full list of the products and services to be provided. Attachment B is a redacted copy of my XX/XX/2021 credit card statement showing the charge from XXXX XXXX. 1
XXXX in California 1
XXXX in email. I am through with all of their sly and low-balling games. 1
XXXX In good standing XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Bank {$72000.00} XXXX. XXXX 1
XXXX in my response letter dated XX/XX/2020 i refuted XXXX XXXX false claim that this was ever a online purchase and was in fact purchased in store by providing a copy of my original receipt and provided a letter stating that i had timely attempted to return my merchandise 1
XXXX IN SERVICES ( Currently there is little to no communication between Government entities and watchdog agencies - allow my case to be the Model Example ) ( Currently there is little to no support systems for Predatory Lending Victims - I am currently XXXX with Families who are victimized - We are XXXX Head of Householders how to protect themselves from Fraud and identify weak or vulnerable areas of the Mortgage Lending Process ) Finally 1
XXXX in the amount of {$420.00} 1
XXXX in the amount of {$5.00} 1
XXXX in their written communication responded as XXXX XXXX XXXX & but are reporting to credit bureau as XXXX. 1
XXXX in total 1
XXXX in US Bankruptcy Court. 1
XXXX in XXXX 3
XXXX in XXXX XXXX disclosures 1
XXXX in XXXX!!! This I believe was done to PREVENT ME FROM REFINANCING 1
XXXX in XXXX. Re-aging the account is illegal. 1
XXXX in XXXX. XXXX third purported owner 1
XXXX in XXXX. XXXX XXXX purported owner 1
XXXX income as proven in financial aid and other IRS forums which can be given upon request ) and food that I have to pay for the month 1
XXXX Incorrect Address - XXXX XXXX WY 1
XXXX Incorrect Address - XXXX XXXX XXXX 3
XXXX Incorrect Address - XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX 1
XXXX Incorrect Address - XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX Incorrect Address- XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX FL XXXX XXXX Incorrect Address- XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX FL 1
XXXX Incorrect Employer : XXXX XXXX Incorrect Employer : XXXX XXXX XXXX Request for Action I am formally requesting that these items be removed from my credit report under the provisions outlined above. I have included a copy of the police report and any additional documentation necessary to support my claim. 1
XXXX Incorrect information identified in reports from all three credit bureaus. 13
XXXX Incorrect Previous Address - XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX Incorrect XXXX : XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Listed below are the Inquiries that are being challenged XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Listed below are the Accounts that are being challenged XXXX - XXXX Listed below are XXXX Collections that are being challenged XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Incorrect CurrentAddress : - XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX Incorrect XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX FL 1
XXXX incorrectly advised Capital One that the account was opened without her permission causing a series of events to trigger including a fraud/restricted status for which we communicate to you today. 1
XXXX incorrectly reported this payment as late to the credit bureaus 1
XXXX increase of {$13.00} XXXX XXXX 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.