Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX ( {$42.00} ). I will submit additional claims information if necessary. In total 1
XXXX ( {$710.00} CO XXXX 1
XXXX ( {$7300.00} ) 6
XXXX ) 69
XXXX ) ( The court has learned through its work on countless FDCPA cases that threatening to report and reporting debts to CRAs is one of the most commonly-used arrows in the debt collector 's quiver '' ) ). 1
XXXX ) ( breaking down the requirements of 1681e ( b ) 15
XXXX ) ( Entered : XX/XX/XXXX ) It is clear and undisputed that Mc Calla Raymer Leibet Pierce 1
XXXX ) ( Remove Comments ) XXXX. XXXX XXXX ( Date Opened : XXXX XXXX 3
XXXX ) ( See Exhibit C 1
XXXX ) ( XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX ) - Information relating to the purchase of a bad debt is not proprietary or burdensome. Debtor must phrase their request clearly to obtain : The source of a debt and the amount a bad debt buyer paid for plaintiff 's debt 1
XXXX ) - XXXX All of these inaccuracies are affecting me negatively 1
XXXX ) - XXXX XXXX XXXX Social Security number - XXXX Date of birth - XX/XX/year> Complete addresses for the past two years- same address XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX ) - {$52000.00} - XXXX XXXX ( TU 1
XXXX ) - {$52000.00} - XXXX XXXX ( XXXX 1
XXXX ) -XXXX ( XXXX ) -XXXX ( XXXX 1
XXXX ) .... 1
XXXX ) 3 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Statements XXXX XXXX XXXX Supplied for Loan ( XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX ) : The FCRA prohibits a consumer reporting agency from denying a fraud block based on technical omissions when the statutory elements are otherwise met. '' IV. FTC XXXX Also Refutes TransUnions Claim : According to the FTC 's XXXX Identity Theft Guidance to CRAs : A police report is sufficient even if it doesnt list each account by name. A consumer can supplement a report with an affidavit identifying specific accounts for blocking. '' V. Final Demand : Given the clear statutory text 1
XXXX ) : Fraudulent accounts added without consent. 1
XXXX ) : This document delves into book-entry securities account maintenance and transfer services 1
XXXX ) about an update to my account 1
XXXX ) Account Name : XXXX XXXXl Account # XXXX has violated my rights ( XXXX 1
XXXX ) Account Name : XXXXXXXX XXXX Account # XXXX has violated my rights ( Equifax 1
XXXX ) all of which can be prevented ( at least on your part ) if followed. I would like my conditions to be met which you have received in this complaint 1
XXXX ) and all that were declined 1
XXXX ) and AXOS Bank ( {$17000.00} ) were both on my credit reports ; and that AXOS Bank had run 2-inquiries to all 3-credit bureaus ( XXXX 1
XXXX ) and confirmed that the last time they issued a check was on XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX ) and were told that that on XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX ) as well as XXXX XXXX for a personal loan and XXXX XXXX XXXX for my auto loan. In all cases 1
XXXX ) Balances ( {$0.00} to {$67000.00} ) Statuses ( Closed vs Open ) This creates false debt inflation and misrepresents credit risk XXXX must delete 1
XXXX ) but have been completely ignored. 1
XXXX ) CAPITAL ONE : ( XXXX - XXXX ) - XXXX Payments missed reported Different Account CAPITAL ONE : ( XXXX - XXXX 1
XXXX ) confirmed this to me over the phone today ( XX/XX/year>2024 ). 1
XXXX ) delete all unauthorized inquiries 1
XXXX ) demonstrated the importance of accurate reporting for collection accounts. 1
XXXX ) did not receive this item 1
XXXX ) drivers license 1
XXXX ) Duplicate accounts 9
XXXX ) even though I have been making monthly payments in the amount of {$260.00} monthly. Even with making payments late 1
XXXX ) except for the one that it was all applied too ( XXXX ). So we could not use credit card XXXX. 1
XXXX ) First Request for Validation : XX/XX/XXXX No acknowledgment received. 1
XXXX ) for the period XXXX Audit payment application practices to determine if payments were properly applied according to my original loan agreements and whether the 83.3 % interest allocation is legal and proper Review forbearance steering practices from XXXX to determine if I was illegally steered into 5+ years of forbearance instead of being offered alternative repayment options available under my private loan agreements that would have prevented catastrophic interest capitalization Investigate predatory interest practices including whether interest rates of 12.750 % -14.250 % combined with aggressive capitalization constitute unfair 1
XXXX ) have : Failed to block fraudulent accounts within four ( 4 ) business days as required by FCRA 605B ( 15 U.S.C. 1681c-2 ). 3
XXXX ) in the fraud dept at Wells Fargo able to provide me with the IP address of the device on which the criminal 1
XXXX ) in XXXX for processing a contract agreement consisting of [ One married partys signature [ my husband ] and did not contain the ( other married Partys signature ) the ( spousal wife ) 2
XXXX ) is inaccurate. This fundamental error calls into question the integrity of the entire file and suggests these derogatory accounts XXXX be linked to me in error. 2
XXXX ) Last Payment : XX/XX/XXXX Current Payment Status : In Collections/ Charge-Off Account Status : Derogatory ( Auto Loan ) Remarks : Charged off as bad debt Purchased by another Lender Closed : XX/XX/XXXX Credit Cards : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Balance : {$9200.00} Credit Limit : {$9000.00} Opened : XX/XX/XXXX ( XXXX 1
XXXX ) making payment by phone is tedious and time consuming navigating Chases automated system verification 1
XXXX ) No contract has been sign and no vehicle was taken 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.