Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XX/XX/XXXX Hard Inquiry Per 15 USC 1681 Permissible Purposes 2
XX/XX/XXXX have been paid 1
XX/XX/XXXX I called Citizens 1
XX/XX/XXXX I called the local branch and spoke to a woman and explained the situation. She was very snarky and told me that I would have to speak to XXXX 1
XX/XX/XXXX I called XXXX Customer Service phone number XXXX and spoke to customer service-related relations team. The representative took notes of the issue and indicated that the situation will be escalated to the XXXX 1
XX/XX/XXXX I come to find out that my claim has been denied due to the fact that I authorize the charges supposedly which I guess is not wrong because I did have to do so but its because I believed I was talking to somebody from my bank and they told me me to call XXXX see if they would do anything for it and of course they would not because yet again I supposedly authorize the charge so ultimately I ended up losing {$4200.00} due to somebody calling me as Wells Fargo representative and walking me through how to send them money.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,NC,28451,,Consent provided,Web,2025-12-24,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,18267664 1
XX/XX/XXXX i demanded that no credit reporting be done until this issue is resolved 1
XX/XX/XXXX I discovered that there was a leak underneath the kitchen sink that was so bad it actually leaked out into the holes in the kitchen floor tile and underneath the kitchen floor cabinets. Now 1
XX/XX/XXXX I filed a police report with the City of XXXX 1
XX/XX/XXXX I get an email from XXXX stating that it would be better to do a low interest credit card for overdraft protection. On XX/XX/XXXX I replied to XXXX and said that I didnt really want another credit card. I also asked if my account currently had any overdraft protection. She never responded. 1
XX/XX/XXXX I have enclosed my FTC Identity Theft Report. All fraudulent items have been listed above. 2
XX/XX/XXXX I have no recollection of authorizing these credit inquiries 2
XX/XX/XXXX I paid the home insurance policy as directed. I uploaded the receipt and the document was rejected again. Now they are requesting the original document I uploaded on Friday XX/XX/XXXX. At this point the closing disclosure will need to be updated again to show the insurance was already paid with an effective date of XX/XX/XXXX as requested by Ally. I scheduled a call with my agent on XX/XX/XXXX. She informed me that the rate extension was now being covered 100 % and theXX/XX/XXXX agent was trying to fix all the issues by XXXX that night. I then got an email from the agent that night saying to go ahead and sign the disclosure to keep the closing on track and they would work to get the disclosure fixed by the next day. I approved the disclosure on the evening of XX/XX/XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX the agent hands me over to the closing specialist. She informs him that the closing disclosure is still being fixed but the rate extension is no longer being covered. This gets us to this complaint. It has taken Ally over 20 days to fix 4 mistakes that I called out. These are basic mortgage items that were overlooked and never addressed. I sent detailed explanations and power point slides to call out the mistakes. It wasnt until XX/XX/XXXX that they acknowledged all mistakes I called out were fixed and I now have enough funds to close. Issues called out : 1. they showed buyer paying all of the XXXX property tax $ XXXX when the seller would pay from XXXX thru Closing 2. When I applied I did not agree to escrow taxes or insurance because I was doing 20 % down. 1
XX/XX/XXXX I received a call from the assigned representative. She indicated that it would be reviewed and I would be notified. I did not hear back from anyone and on Friday 1
XX/XX/XXXX I received a call from XXXX XXXX XXXX stating they were contacting me about a debt 1
XX/XX/XXXX I received another call from Hunter Warfield. The caller told me I now owe {$620.00}. He stated that Hunter 's customer service department verified and adjusted the balance due. They adfjusted the items on the move-in sheet and now I owe more? Why am I dealing with a third party only. If XXXX states I owe anything 1
XX/XX/XXXX I received the results of my dispute in the mail and Transunion denied my claim saying that the derogatory account is valid ( despite it not being mine as I have never taken out a loan ) and the SSN 1
XX/XX/XXXX I updated my name 1
XX/XX/XXXX in the afternoon. 1
XX/XX/XXXX in the amount of {$3500.00} 1
XX/XX/XXXX increased to {$2500.00} XXXX : Principal {$20000.00} 1
XX/XX/XXXX interest charge - {$0.00} 1
XX/XX/XXXX Interest charges - {$78.00} Total in late fee and interest charges are - {$500.00} Lots of complaints were made to CFPB and XXXX regarding this matter but to no avail. 1
XX/XX/XXXX is completely accurate.It 's strange 3
XX/XX/XXXX is the day our rate lock was scheduled to expire. 1
XX/XX/XXXX Issue : I dispute all late payment records on these accounts. 3
XX/XX/XXXX LATE PAYMENT XXXX XXXX 1
XX/XX/XXXX Late Payments : XXXX XXXX 1
XX/XX/XXXX Late Payments : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Action Requested for All Items : I request that TransUnion verify each account 1
XX/XX/XXXX Late Payments : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XX/XX/XXXX Late Payments : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX,,EQUIFAX 1
XX/XX/XXXX lease changes from XXXX to XXXX in monthly rent removing garage XXXX. XX/XX/XXXX 1
XX/XX/XXXX left message for XXXX XXXX ( Supervisor ) 1
XX/XX/XXXX Legal Basis for Deletion : Under Section 611 of the FCRA ( 15 U.S.C. 1681i ) 1
XX/XX/XXXX Miscellaneous/Unknown Unknown UK Unknown Inquiry Date XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Basis for Removal : Under FCRA 15 U.S.C. 1681b ( a ) 1
XX/XX/XXXX National Credit Systems 1
XX/XX/XXXX neither of us have received the letter they claim they sent. Fifth Third is unable to provide tracking information or delivery confirmation. 1
XX/XX/XXXX notice of hearing date to be set by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XX/XX/XXXX NY 1
XX/XX/XXXX on time 1
XX/XX/XXXX One shows {$65.00} - XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date Opened : XX/XX/XXXX - XXXX XXXX Entries dated XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX XXXX shows {$170.00} - XXXX Date Opened : XX/XX/XXXX Balance : {$0.00} - XXXX XXXXREPORTED ( XXXX ) Balance : {$210.00} - Chapter XXXX Bankruptcy Filed XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Your continued reporting of these items after receiving my dispute and supporting evidence constitutes negligent noncompliance under 15 U.S.C. 1681o. This provision holds consumer reporting agencies and furnishers of information liable for actual damages 3
XX/XX/XXXX only to be told that more documentation is needed. 1
XX/XX/XXXX Past Due : {$15000.00} 3
XX/XX/XXXX PAYMENT {$1200.00} {$1200.00} {$68000.00} but in XXXX i came back and made three payment XXXX XXXX and XXXX so that should have covered the the fund insufficient funds and put be me for XXXX for XXXX from payments in suspense fund 1
XX/XX/XXXX Phone ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX via XXXX XXXX Location XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XX/XX/XXXX Phone ( XXXX ) XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XX/XX/XXXX Phone : ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX Capital XXXX XXXX 1
XX/XX/XXXX Please verify the purpose of these inquiries or remove them if they were unauthorized.,,EQUIFAX 1
XX/XX/XXXX providing evidence of my clicks 1
XX/XX/XXXX Remove Unauthorized Fraudulent Inquiries Listed Below : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 3

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.