Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

145,512 companies

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response Most Recent
Company Complaints
with warranties and everything. He printed another form and showed us what additional warranties would look like and suggested what would be best and why. We agreed on what we thought would be best and allowed him to give us the additional costs with the additional warranties 1
with way higher limits! THIS IS RIDICULOUS!! This is hurting my chances of getting a better interest rate for a new home I plan to buy soon. I appreciate your help. THANK YOU,,Portfolio Recovery Associates 1
with what I came to find out as he finally explained what it was they were requesting 1
with which I have no affiliation. 1
with whom I had already spoken and verified ( I have the conversation recorded on XX/XX/XXXX ) that they have no claim against me. He also volunteered the information that I was not the only person dealing with this type of situation. 1
with whom I had an account since XXXX ( see the attached documents ). 1
with whom I had spoken for assistance and guidance 1
with whom I have no financial relationship at all 1
with whom I have previously filed a direct dispute for this exact account and for which they are not the original creditor. I have never had an account with Cascade Capital. It is my belief that they are re-reporting this inaccurate account in an attempt to fraudulently collect in violation of FDCPA 15 USC 1692e ( 8 ) by communicating credit information which is known or which should be known to be false 1
with whom I spoke 1
with whom we must confer regarding any offer ( s ) 1
with written confirmation of reinvestigation results provided within 15 days under 1681i ( a ). 2
with XXXX 2
with XXXX also indicating XXXX Doe XXXX next to her signature. 1
with XXXX as the creditor. I told them I want to dispute this 2
with XXXX calls generated each time 1
with XXXX checking in with me every 10 minutes to make sure I was still on the line. He told me that XXXX did not finish the transaction and that he would look into it. Soon later 1
with XXXX counts of inaccurate information and violations. 1
with XXXX exception-the agent I first spoke to should have warned me of the possible double payment problem. 1
with XXXX himself actually being recruited to join the I.D . Thieves cause 1
with XXXX indicating XXXX instances of 90-day late payments compared to only 1 reported by Experian. Moreover 1
with XXXX indicating XXXX instances of 90-day late payments compared to only 1 reported by XXXX. Moreover 1
with XXXX issues 1
with XXXX months of CO coding. 3
with XXXX more {$50.00} installments scheduled over the next XXXX months. 1
with XXXX remaining on the line throughout. Afterward 1
with XXXX reporting XX/XX/XXXX 2
with XXXX showing XX/XX/XXXX 1
with XXXX XXXX 2
with XXXX XXXX on XXXX and XXXX and with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
with XXXX XXXX but only work XXXX XXXX. I recently suffer a small XXXX and XXXX from being sick XX/XX/XXXX. I was sick a month misdiagnosed and probably had the XXXX XXXX 1
with XXXX XXXX XXXX via XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX on XXXX and with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. These accounts have resulted in several fraudulent charge-offs 1
with XXXX XXXX XXXX being the most-hated card issuer in Alaska. 1
with XXXX XXXX XXXX I was able to accomplish this easily on line. At the Transunion site ( transunion.com ) there was no discernible link to place a security freeze. When attempting to reach them by phone 1
with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX who filed proceedings against me for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and asked that he cease and desist because their defendants addresses 1
with XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX on XXXX 1
with XXXX. ; ( XXXX ) I never filed an initial dispute with Affirm because I didn't know my powers and options once I was locked it 1
with XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX via XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX on XXXX and with XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. These accounts have resulted in several fraudulent charge-offs 1
with your apparent consistency with being extraordinarily INCONSISTENT has to make the question to the actual existence even of this claimed circumstance much less likely being been MIXED onto my credit report by an erroneous reporting error because your company cant maintain accurate information 2
with {$1000.00} per violation AARGON AGENCY is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where AARGON AGENCY is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation ABILITY RECOVERY SERVICES is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where ABILITY RECOVERY SERVICES is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation ALLIED INERSTATE LLC is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where ALLIED INERSTATE LLC is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation ARS ACCOUNT RESOLUTION is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see whereARS ACCOUNT RESOLUTIONis in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation CHOICE RECOVERY INC is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where CHOICE RECOVERY INC is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation COMMON WEALTH FINANCIAL is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where COMMON WEALTH FINANCIAL is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING INC is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING INC is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation CREDIT MANAGEMENT is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where CREDIT MANAGEMENT is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation Debt Recovery Solutions is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where Debt Recovery Solutions is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation DEBT RECOVERY SOLUTIONS is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where DEBT RECOVERY SOLUTIONS is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.