2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: Y

Companies starting with Y that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

1.5K companies starting with "Y"

Showing 251–300 of 1.5K

Company Complaints
yet the account has no DATE CLOSED - Please CLOSE this account with the actual effective date 1
yet the account is still damaging me with errors. Without documented proof from the original creditor that these late payments are accurate 1
yet the account remains on my report. This error continues to damage my creditworthiness 1
yet the account was charged off without acknowledgment of my efforts XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX This is a collection account being reported without a proper chain of title or validation Law : FCRA 1681b requires a permissible purpose for reporting 1
yet the balance and charge-off amount is {$720.00} 2
yet the bank continues to treat the activity as fraud without justification or transparency. 1
yet the bank has failed to return the funds and continues to provide conflicting information. 1
yet the bank still failed to respond through any channel.// Failure to Respond to Formal Appeals and Information Requests. 1
yet the card couldnt be activated. 1
yet the case has been closed already twice. 1
yet the case was prematurely marked as closed. 1
yet the charge-off is reported as incomeposing a separate legal issue. 1
yet the charge-off status appears inconsistently before that date. 1
yet the continued inclusion of outdated 1
yet the continued reporting of an unvalidated charge-off shows failure to comply. Section 609 ( a ) gives me the right to know the sources of the information 1
yet the creditor continues to report the balance to the credit reporting agencies 1
yet the creditor continues to report the balance to the credit reporting agencies as an active charge-off. 8
yet the creditor continues to report the balance to the credit reporting agencies as an active charged-off. 1
yet the dealer never confirmed payment was made. 1
yet the delinquency was continuously unfairly reported to the credit agencies. 1
yet the derogatory status remains Law & Instruction : Under FCRA 607 ( B ) and 611 1
yet the employees notes were added to the account and given as a reason late fee reversals were again denied on a XX/XX/XXXX call. Since BoA is using hardship as the reason to deny late fees reversals 1
yet the fee was not charged. This is when she hung up on me! 1
yet the financial obligation is exactly the same. I asked XXXX for the name of the CEO of State Farm Bank. The second SFB representative that was also on the line at the same time gave me his name 1
yet the following remain on my credit reports. 2
yet the funds are missing. 1
yet the furnisher altered just this one monthretroactively and without justificationcausing the overall status of the account to become adverse. 1
yet the furnishers failed to provide ANY original signed contract 2
yet the inaccuracies remain unchanged. 1
yet the information continues to be reported to the credit bureaus in its inaccurate form. I have sent letters to request the correction 1
yet the issue persists. 3
yet the issue remains unaddressed. 1
yet the items have not been removed as required. This suggests a violation of 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) 2
yet the mere presence of a dismissed bankruptcy on a credit report after that closing date is highly questionable. According to the Federal Trade Commission and multiple court precedents 1
yet the negative items remain on my report. 1
yet the other credit bureaus took the necessary steps to delete or suppress them. I also reached out to each company and provided them the information. One of the companies even advised they received the request for validation from XXXX and XXXX only and could not produce any required documents. 1
yet the repair funds have not been released. 1
yet the reported payment history and closure reasons differ and misrepresent my payment performance. 1
yet the result from the CFPB complaint was in XXXX. 1
yet the Santander USA 1
yet the statement it say contact comenity bank. So they give me a run around and I to blame when I call. 1
yet the XXXX XXXX 2
yet the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX account with the same balance appears everywhere except Equifax 2
yet their suggestion to solve my problem was to call to be verified. '' In response to my letter the bank wrote me that : When you called us on XX/XX/XXXX 1
yet there are inconsistencies in late payment notations. 3
yet these addresses remain on file. XXXX failure to remove these unverifiable addresses is a direct violation of FCRA Section 602 ( a ) 1
yet these false addresses have remained despite my repeated disputes. 1
yet these fraudulent activities continue. Despite my vigilance 1
yet they all want me to pay on the same debt. Yet 2
yet they are holding the money that was transferred to me in XXXX that was in fact authorized 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter Y that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related