2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 8.8K–8.8K of 8.9K

Company Complaints
would have significantly aided me during my XXXX XXXX treatment. 1
would have taken place except I was unilaterally signed up for electronic banking and not made aware that statements had been terminated 2
would have to upload it to their system and then I would be able to pay ONLY {$440.00} and they would make the account accessible online to me again. THIS IS RECORDED. 1
would help the Plaintiff with this matter to determine the next steps or what to do with her abandoned Countrywide loan 1
would I like to go back on it. It sounds like you can't make your payment ''. I said NO! He said ok you pay me now over the phone 1
would I like to know what it is? 1
would I still responsible? She did not reply. 1
would it have been simpler to call me? To respond to the dates of the drive by 's. One payoff letter shows dates XX/XX/XXXX 1
would lead a reasonable person to understand that XX/XX/year> was the account opening date. 1
would lead to FDCPA violations. 3
would leave us in a deficit and would have to sell or lose the home. Putting us in foreclosure is not a solution. Loosing our home is not a solution. We have a very legitimate circumstance that needs to be fixed. This falls back on BB & T as a simple solution. We believe the lender has not done their due diligence in resoving the best course of action.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,BB&T CORPORATION,UT,84084,,Consent provided,Web,2016-03-16,Closed with explanation,Yes,No,1834464 1
would let us know if we need additional documents. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
would like to save the time and energy that will be required to litigate and WIN I'm court.,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,CIG FINANCIAL LLC,CA,92651,,Consent provided,Web,2022-03-13,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5310831 1
would likely encompass protection. The XXXX Complaints Management Office did absolutely nothing to clarify Wells Fargo 's actions ''. There was no explanation. All they said was that the decision stands without acknowledging anything about the situation. I haven't been provided any rationale for why I am not qualified for fraud protection. 1
would make me a very desirable loan candidate 1
would make them feel better about the lower rate. For them to only present the most advantageous route for their company 1
would mislead a reasonable individual exercising due care; or ( ii ) fails to contain information which is necessary in light of all of the circumstances 8
would n't give it back 1
would need to update this information on our behalf since this is their Account. 2
would need to update this information on our behalf. 2
would never be able to operate as we were told by XXXX. The Support person did configure the system 1
would never have been spent as the Pre-Approval was apparently invalid from the start! 1
would never verify that the card was in her possession when the charge was made! While the card was never lost or stolen on our trip to XXXX 1
would not get back with me 1
would not get this loan out of underwriting until early XXXX 1
would not have solved the problem. ) To date I have had no response to my email.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,CITIBANK 1
would not listen. She told us that the quote would be ready tomorrow. 1
would now be recalculated using the updated interest rate and that we'll receive a new payment schedule 1
would now process XXXX transactions on behalf of XXXX XXXX. Juno 's end users hold accounts with XXXX XXXX. '' ... this left me wondering 1
would only be at attentions therefore 1
would only decrease the original balance by {$7200.00} after XXXX months leaving a balance of {$4200.00} due to avoid deferred interest which most consumers dont have on hand ). ( 4 ) The deferred interest rate being applied of 28.99 % is significantly higher than any bank card interest rate. 1
would require defendants to pay {$100.00} million in consumer redress and a {$20.00} XXXX penalty. The order would also 1
would return my call within 48 to 72 hours. That callback never came. 1
would subject my government issued check to an extended hold. 1
would take 10 business days 1
would take the amount I owe and load it onto the end of the mortgage ( I don't care for this scenario 1
would the payments and removals not increase my score? When I started this journey 1
would then lead to the check getting mailed out. Thus 1
would they consider this debt valid. Nordstrom subsequently reported my account as delinquent to XXXX on XX/XX/ 1
would they? ) the Department of Education records receiving {$76000.00}. However the amounts for each of the Loans are different than Navient has recorded as being sent. Somehow 1
would voluntarily transfer the ownership of the property to the owner of your mortgage in exchange for a release from your mortgage loan and payments. This is often a good choice if you no longer want to stay in the home or you can no longer afford to stay in the home 1
would you approve the verification of income at {$24.00} an hour 1
would you be able to resume your payments? I said 1
would you do business with Freedom Mortgage?,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Freedom Mortgage Company,WA,98383,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2019-03-20,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3179655 1
would you like to speak with our client relations team? 1
would you rather have the car instead of XXXX XXXX.,,General Motors Financial Company 1
would you tell me how will you state your credit report 1
would/ should be a resounding NO. The only rate we received on this date was this one. 1
wouldn't fix my SSN. They gave me a fax number to send my identity documents 1
wouldn't I use my new 2

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related