2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 8.6K–8.6K of 8.9K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
without my permission or written consent which is against the law. 15 USC 1681s2 ( A ) ( 1 ) A states A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate. 15 USC 1681e states Every consumer reporting agency shall maintain reasonable procedures designed to avoid violations of section 1681c of this title and to limit the furnishing of consumer reports to the purpose listed under section 1681b of this title. TRANSUNION is not maintaining reasonable procedures. 1
without my permission to sell or transfer my data to Portfolio Recovery Associates. I assert that this transfer of information violates my rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) 1
without needing any evidence 1
WITHOUT NEVER INFORMING IT TO ME BEFORE I ACCEPTED THIS PAYMENT AGREEMENT 2
without notice 3
without notice or consent '' It also now states 1
without notifying me about it or asking my approval to significantly exceed the credit limit. 1
without notifying you 1
without offering evidence or legal justification. 2
without omissions and or deviations from that required used appropriateness which ensures a non-jeopardized degree of integrity reporting allegations against me satisfying at least the minimal criteria to satisfy the federal and my state 's applicable regulatory mandates for reporting. This means it needs to be reported to an extent no lesser than that of a MAXIMUM POSSIBILE ACCURACY AND MAXIMUM POSSIBIE COMPLETENESS! NEITHER OF WHICH HAS EQUIFAX DONE as you will see further down in this letter. 1
without omissions and or deviations from that required used appropriateness which ensures a non-jeopardized degree of integrity reporting allegations against me satisfying at least the minimal criteria to satisfy the federal and my state 's applicable regulatory mandates for reporting. This means it needs to be reported to an extent no lesser than that of a MAXIMUM POSSIBILE ACCURACY AND MAXIMUM POSSIBIE COMPLETENESS! NEITHER OF WHICH HAS EXPERIAN DONE as you will see further down in this letter. 1
without omissions and or deviations from that required used appropriateness which ensures a non-jeopardized degree of integrity reporting allegations against me satisfying at least the minimal criteria to satisfy the federal and my state 's applicable regulatory mandates for reporting. This means it needs to be reported to an extent no lesser than that of a MAXIMUM POSSIBILE ACCURACY AND MAXIMUM POSSIBIE COMPLETENESS! NEITHER OF WHICH HAS TRANSUNION DONE as you will see further down in this letter. 2
without options and without cause. Considering my credit limit has been stable for years 1
without our approval. 1
without our knowledge and without consulting with us. He was not still satisfied he charged us an interest rate of 3.625 % with annual percentage rate of 4.714 % when the prevailing interest rate was less than 3 % at the time of closing. 1
without our permission 1
without paying a fee. Ultimately I requested to speak to a supervisor. After an extensive conversation 1
without paying interest. This practice is in violation of banking laws and consumer protection laws. Someone needs to look into Wells Fargo 's illegal practices in order to protect consumers.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,NH,03110,,Consent provided,Web,2024-03-29,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,8657096 1
without permissible purpose or authorization. 3
without prejudice 2
without prejudice ( XXXX XXXX ). 1
Without prejudice By : XXXX : XXXX 3
without prejudice Requested Action : XXXX. Delete all fraudulent inquiries and accounts listed above from my credit report ( s ). 3
Without Prejudice UCC 1-308. 5
without prejudice. 1
without prior consent. 1
without prior notification. Unfortunately 2
without progress or an outcome. The XXXX XXXX Clerk and myself have both sent a KY Certificate of Title form to HMF to sign also and have not received a response.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA,KY,41011,,Consent provided,Web,2022-07-18,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5783639 1
without proof of ID. Also 1
without proof that the bureaus obtained or reviewed certified records 1
without proper investigation and validation 1
without proper validation or verification. 3
without proper validation. 3
without providing a credit card. How can I be responsible for rogue charges such as this? This $ XXXX was almost double the credit limit on my card so a lower limit wouldn't have helped in this case.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,AZ,850XX,Older American 1
without providing a reasonable explanation of its investigation. Their repeated denials violate their obligations under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ( EFTA ) 1
without providing any concrete resolution or explanation. 1
without providing any documentation or evidence supporting the validity of the charge. 1
without providing any evidence beyond referencing their own records. Given that the court itself does not verify this information 2
without providing any evidence of a thorough investigation. 1
without providing any of the following : A signed wet-ink agreement showing I opened the account Specific steps taken during the reinvestigation process The source or contact information of the entity that verified the account Any explanation why the FTC Identity Theft Report and affidavit were ignored Other bureaus removed similar accounts 1
without providing any substantive explanation or documenting any actions on my part that may have warranted such action. 1
without providing me the requested documentation 1
without providing my Phone number. That is because 1
without providing the mandatory five-day reinsertion notice 1
without punishment 1
without qualification : Overdraft Coverage - Your account is currently Opted Out. 1
without reason or discussion 1
without receiving or having access to any sort of statement or statement notification. I was requesting to have the late fee credited back 1
without recourse 1
without recourse except as provided herein 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →