2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 8.3K–8.3K of 8.9K

Company Complaints
with {$1000.00} per violation XXXX XXXX XXXX is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where XXXX XXXX XXXX is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 5
with {$1000.00} per violation. CMRE FINANCIAL is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where CMRE FINANCIAL is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violation. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
with {$1000.00} per violationAFNI is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where AFNI is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violationENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violationJEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violationPHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICE is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICE is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violationXXXX XXXX XXXX is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where XXXX XXXX XXXX is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violationXXXX XXXX XXXX is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where XXXX XXXX XXXX is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 1
with {$1000.00} per violationXXXX XXXX XXXX is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of OHIO indebtedness with those of other creditors against an individual debtor or codebtors. FDCPA I fail to see where XXXX XXXX XXXX is in compliance with OHIO LAW. I also have report this account to the FTC 2
with {$1500.00} of that being interest alone. The structure of these payments is not sustainable long-term 1
with {$2000.00} ready to pay immediately I also explained my financial hardship : I am a single-income parent of a XXXX 1
with {$220.00} 1
with {$51000.00} going to PNC per their estoppel to release their lien which they refuse to do ( Exhibit E ). A full timeline of events is available upon request. 1
with {$550.00} that came from my bank account under duress ( a total of {$700.00} I paid out ). 1
with-in XXXX hours. 1
withdraw complaints 1
withdraw unlawful legal actions ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... 1
Withdrawal 1
withdrawals 1
withdrawn 1
Withdrawn as cash 1
withdraws 1
withdraws in the past 1
withdrew {$1000.00} 1
withheld 1
withheld from CFPB by OCWEN 1
withheld the banks denial 1
withholding info to push foreclosurea deceptive act ( CFPA 5536 ) and elder abuse via undue influence ( EADACPA 15610.30 ). 2
withholding this information to me as the buyer. Instead the following representatives ( XXXX XXXX 1
withholding transcripts 1
within 1-3 business days. '' Additionally 1
within 120 days of signing the PSA 1
within 15 business days 1
within 15 days of receipt of this letter 1
within 15 days of this letter. Should you continue to ignore my request for this validation letter including proof of my signature 1
within 2 complete billing cycles ( but in no event later than 90 days ) after receiving a billing error notice. 1
within 20 minutes to one hour. That time has elapsed 1
within 24 hours of such repossession. 1
within 3 business days of taking such action 6
within 3 months 1
within 30 days 3
within 30 days ) and was shocked when on XX/XX/XXXX 2
within 30 days after receipt of the notice 1
within 30 days of receiving the complete loss mitigation application 1
within 30 days of receiving XXXX ' loss mitigation application 1
within 35 days of creating an overdraftXXXX,,ARVEST BANK GROUP 1
within 48 hours. At that time 1
within 5 business days of their reinsertion 2
within 60 days after discovering an error ( whether pursuant to a final written examination report or the servicer 's own procedures ) and before the commencement of an action under this subsection and the receipt of written notice of the error from the borrower 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related