2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 6.3K–6.3K of 8.9K

Company Complaints
which would clearly show me at the ATM making the deposit 1
which would consistently hang up without leaving me a voice message. I get a lot of spam calls 1
which would constitute a violation of my rights under federal law and continue to harm me financially 5
which would directly affect my personal balance. 1
which would distort my credit metrics through no fault of my own. 1
which would entitle me to legal compensation in addition to the initial amount + damages 1
which would establish your right to collect this alleged debt within 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of this letter. 2
which would happen if the PayPal agent consciously hung up on us. All XXXX agents who were helping me with the case all noted how unhelpful PayPal was being during the investigation. 1
which would happen if the XXXX agent consciously hung up on us. All Chase agents who were helping me with the case all noted how unhelpful XXXX was being during the investigation. 1
which would have amounted to over {$200.00} to their XXXX location. Their terms of service ( attached ) and website do not state that the buyer is responsible for return shipping costs 1
which would have been a huge load for me. INGO should not be asking people to write VOID across the checks if they are not going to accept the photo or be available to resolve the issue before they decline the entire transaction.,,Ingo Money 1
WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN REIMBURSED 1
which would have been unreasonable for me to do 4
which would have been XX/XX/XXXX at the very latest. 2
which would have been XX/XX/XXXXXXXX at the very latest. 1
which would have enabled it to continue operating under stricter supervision. The company 's XXXX XXXX campus annual revenue was roughly {$20.00} million 1
which would have further risked my safety. He has also broken multiple orders in the past. It's just a piece of paper to him. 1
which would have helped to cover some of the increase in my escrow payments. Fifth Third refuses to remove my wife 's name from the primary mortgage despite these screw-ups. I can not afford the higher loan payments if I am forced to refinance. 1
which would have influenced my decision for school choice 1
which would have meant my moms account would have been open until XX/XX/XXXX. Since Wells Fargo is paying settlements for wrongful & illegal activity on accounts that were active in XXXX and Wells Fargo did not legally keep my moms account open for a full year 1
which would have not allowed him to take advantage of the 3.5 % down payment. This was all overseen by the mortgage broker. 1
which would have paid off the initial {$2500.00} purchase prior to the end of the promotional period. They said they would not do it and that if I paid the outstanding balance immediately 1
which would have placed the property at a valuation of around $ XXXX. 1
which would have revealed the loans unaffordability 1
which would have shown that my payments were jumping {$500.00} per month for a mistake NEWREZ made charging me for my annual tax bill two times. 1
which would have then transitioned my numbers for the first modification into a program 1
which would likely increase my payments. 1
which would likely occur on XX/XX/XXXX and be reflected in my account on XX/XX/XXXX. 1
which would make it easier for Citi to lock COMPLAINTANT 's entire portfolio of Citi accounts 1
which would mislead to believe my power was in danger of being shut off. Caller 2 1
which would negatively and detrimentally impact my credit score and report 1
which would obviously contradict what I was told by the employee 1
which would pay the sum total of {$2200.00} remaining on the deferred interest rate plan. I made sure to clarify on the call that these payments should both be applied to the deferred interest rate balance. The representative told me he applied those changes. 1
which would presumably have been contacted as part of any investigation by DAS 1
which would require another week of processing ( essentially starting the entire application and mortgage process over ). We asked her to provide the change in costs associated with choosing a different mortgage product. She said that she would do so in one hour from the time our phone call ended on XX/XX/XXXX. During this call 1
which would require that I put an additional {$7000.00} 1
which would show a complete breakdown of work 1
which would show the refund. 1
which would take longer to process. 1
which would take two weeks. It took considerable amount of time and arguing on my part to have XXXX to make a request an electronic refund to my checking account. XXXX did not know if her BBVA supervisors would accept her request for electronic refund 1
which would then cause a hard inquiry on my credit score 1
which would total {$20000.00} 1
which would XXXX out. On XX/XX/XXXX 1
which XXXX confirmed was untrue. 1
which XXXX ( a store manager ) gave me on XX/XX/2018 1
which XXXX ( InComm ) is refusing to do. 1
which XXXX also provided to Chase. XXXX also provided Chase a copy of the credit card payment receipt for the charge 1
which XXXX did remit payment for at that time. 1
which XXXX has violated The nearly three-year duration of these practices demonstrates they are systematic and intentional 1
which XXXX released me from. In an early recorded call 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related