2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: P

Companies starting with P that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

3.0K companies starting with "P"

Showing 2.8K–2.8K of 3.0K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
providing banking statements and electronic transaction remittals 1
providing documentation where I paid the money and proof that they told me the deposit was refundable.,,Chime Financial Inc,SC,29505,,Consent provided,Web,2025-09-24,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,16148236 1
providing evidence that I did not consent to these inquiries. 1
providing false and inaccurate information regarding the loan VA construction costs to us 1
providing false information 1
providing her with marriage and death certificates 1
Providing inaccurate or misleading data to bureaus. 1
providing my social security number and/or drivers license number-in writing- via fax or U.S. Mail causes potential for fraud and theft 1
providing necessary details 1
providing no further information or resolution. Consequently 1
providing no substantive rationale. I am including a completion letter from the facility attesting to my confinement during that time 2
providing of information I can not otherwise obtain 1
providing only a 10-day notice before the payment draft ( see attachment ). This falls short of the required 21-day advance notice. This happened again in XXXX as I was notified on XX/XX/XXXX that my bill was due on XX/XX/XXXX ; again not providing me the full 21-day notice. 1
providing screenshots and messages as requested to scammers. However 3
providing services to scammers without verifying the client 's details and making sure the client aware of his actions. Please find the attached proofs of Kraken not being honest with their clients. 1
providing specific information about the debt. This includes the amount of the debt 1
providing sufficient communication or supporting documentation from the merchant 1
providing supporting documentation to substantiate my claims. However 3
providing supportive evidence such as a video 1
providing the Federal Reference Number for the second transfer 1
providing the information I requested from you several times 1
providing them police records 1
providing them with greater information 1
providing updates on our conversation here. However 1
providing wrong information 3
providing you with these details may take a great deal of time. Expect to hear back from us no sooner than 90 days from today. There was no mention that any of my loans that were transferred to them were ineligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness ( PSLF ) Program 1
proving a legal obligation to pay ; 4. Documentation of the complete chain of title/ownership 1
proving ChexSystems is an outlier in violation Current Reporting ( as of XX/XX/XXXX ) : ChexSystems is furnishing the following fraudulent data to TransUnion : Two DDA account closures {$6200.00} in unpaid checking debt Ten DDA-related inquiries over a three-year period This has caused actual credit denials and reputational harm. 1
proving errors in escrow application and failure to fully refund improper charges. Shellpoint 's data itself demonstrates these discrepancies 1
proving I had no involvement. I initially reached out to XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX to ensure I had no open accounts that could leave me vulnerable. They were unable to locate the account under my name or XXXX 1
proving I never lived at the address. The person who stole my identity used a fraudulent internet account for payments and credit increases. 1
proving illegal foreclosure and other crimes done to me as an XXXX XXXXXXXX person and homeowner of 34 years. This attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX should be disbarred for this abuse to me 1
proving legal assignment to XXXX XXXX ; A chain of custody of ownership from XXXX XXXX Bank to Barings XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
proving legal right to collect and report this debt XXXX. A Forward Flow Agreement 1
proving my personal identifying information was stolen and misused. 1
proving once again that they have no legal standing in this matter. 1
proving that Equifax has inserted this collection account in error. 1
proving that Hunt & Henriques made timely notifications. 1
proving that I traveled on XXXX XXXX 1
proving that it was the robber who had charged the card 1
proving that the data can not be fully substantiated. Because my personal data was already compromised in the Equifax breach 3
proving that these payments were made. Additionally 1
proving that they accessed my file without my consent. PACER Privacy Policy prohibits access and use of PACER records for resale/redistribution without lawful purpose nor can LCI/G2 use it to profit via furshing information to the credit bureaus such as TransUnion. 1
proving the data is unreliable. 1
proving the data is unverifiable. 1
proving their knowing non-compliance despite being on notice. It is deeply deceptive and unethical for Experian and Equifax to present themselves as purveyors of accurate credit data while deliberately reintroducing information they know to be false. Such behavior also violates the spirit of the Consumer Financial Protection Act ( under which the CFPB can deem practices unfair or abusive ). 2
proving these frauds/crimes are being committed with malice and intent by XXXX and his partner XXXX XXXX. White collar they may be 2
PROVING they failed to even investigate!! ( see attachments 5 and 6 ) I would like all the late payments removed from this account 3
proving they have NEVER had lawful authority. 2
PROVING they never even investigated this! ( see attachments 5 and 6 ) Another VIOLATION! 3

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter P that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →