2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: I

Companies starting with I that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

25.6K companies starting with "I"

Showing 11.4K–11.4K of 25.6K

Company Complaints
inaccurately reporting information about student loan payments that were suspended under the CARES Act. 1
inaccurately reporting information about student loan payments that were suspended under the XXXX XXXX. 1
inaccurateXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date OpenedXXXX XXXX 1
inactive. The banks 1
inadequacy 3
inadequate 3
inadequate disclosure and the money I may have lost due to this.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,TX,76116,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2018-02-24,Closed with monetary relief,No,N/A,2824640 1
inappropriate 1
inappropriate bank security are totally ignored by the XXXX office? Do they know that fabricating fake data is highly illegal? 1
inBank withdrawals ( {$1600.00} ATM ) stating that because the PIN was used 1
Inc '' has provided only a timeline hold until XXXX XXXX XXXX. The provider XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX '' must be the XXXX to make the correction. They have intentionally placed a fraudulent overpayment as a balance to be collected 1
Inc ( ChexSystems ) consumer identification number 1
Inc ( Hereafter refered to as SPS ) requesting the exact department and mailing address to send Mortgage Subordination Agreement. ( See Phone Log XX/XX/XXXX ). The Mortgage Subordination Agreement was sent to SPS on XX/XX/XXXX. [ 2 ] SPS acknowledge receipt of XX/XX/XXXX correspondence with their letter dated XX/XX/XXXX. [ 3 ] Mortgagors made several calls to SPS requesting the status of their completion of the Mortgage Subordination Agreement. SPSs reply was general in stating 1
Inc ( RMG ). This company is in Georgia and I am in Texas 1
Inc ( Self. ) is required by federal regulation to maintain accurate & factual reporting. Therefore 1
Inc (FL),FL,32955,,Consent provided,Web,2020-05-18,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3657793 1
Inc (FL),FL,33411,,Consent provided,Web,2018-01-19,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,2787837 1
Inc ) had no concerns whatsoever 1
INC ). I requested for SPS to give Mortgage Assistance Alabama a call at XXXX to get this sorted out 1
Inc . 2
Inc . I did not call the phone numbers listed. The Account number listed for XXXX is not the account number on my prior XXXX invoices.,,Collection Bureau of the Hudson Valley 1
Inc . I have attempted to rectify this situation on numerous occasions : I am including three separate communications ( 2 letters and one fax from my attorney ) that addressed this issue last year- none of which have elicited a response back from Seterus 1
Inc . Neither XXXX nor Transworld Systems XXXX XXXX did not provide me with the original contract as I requested.,,TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC,OK,73013,,Consent provided,Web,2024-02-09,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,8276728 1
Inc .,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,Child Support Recovery Services 1
Inc .,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING 1
Inc and its Subsidiary Cash App which occurred on a global scale. 1
Inc and they sayd they will look into it. Couple of times I was on conference call with both XXXX XXXX XXXX and Dovenmuehle Mortgage 1
INC are also in violation of 15 U.S. Code 1692b ( 2 ) which states that you may not state that I a consumer owes any debt. Furthermore 1
Inc asking I would not like to be contacted until I can sort this issue out with my dental office. My next dental appointment was XX/XX/XXXX 1
INC COMMITTED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WITH XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX DOCUMENTS INCLUDING NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSION,,CIT BANK 1
Inc has Exceeded the 30 days to complete this investigation as outlined per the Fair Credit Reporting Act 623 ( a ) ( 3 ). 1
Inc Management. '' This response is insufficient as it does not address the legal violations outlined below. 1
Inc negligence 1
Inc provide the above listed documents,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING 1
Inc refused to give a list of charges in any shape or form 1
Inc that claims that the damages which I have suffered in connection to this matter have not been reasonably foreseeable 1
Inc they assured me that they had no requirement to furnish proof of that fee and did not need authorization to charge my bank account directly. 1
Inc to move forward with this complaint.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Convergent Resources 1
INC to request the information to verify the debt. 1
Inc trade lines and credit report 1
Inc v. Oyster ( 1952 ) Affiant claims that Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and Fannie Mae are in Breach of contract Breach of Fiduciary Dty Committing Fraud Estate Embezzlement Promissory Fraud in addition Affiant would like the record to show forth the following laws as well and for them to be placed into evidence : 2 1Title 4983 85 and 86 Title 18 241 and 242 Ignorance of the law is no excuse The practice of law is an occupation of common rights CC :,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,FL,33870,,Consent provided,Web,2025-01-30,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,11852485 1
INC was consequently added to the Adversary Proceeding. 1
Inc XXXX 1
Inc XXXX 's response to no avail. All I'm asking is that the debt in collections be cleared from January Technologies 1
Inc XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
INC!,,Chime Financial Inc,AL,356XX,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2022-09-15,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5986884 1
Inc,,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2015-12-28,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,Yes,1716810 1
Inc,,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2021-04-19,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4308766 1
Inc,,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2022-04-11,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,5434994 1
Inc,,XXXXX,,Consent provided,Web,2024-05-23,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,9083262 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter I that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related